Crisis-induced public demand for regulatory intervention in the social media era: Examining the moderating roles of perceived government controllability and consumer collective efficacy

Through an online survey of Beijing consumer publics, this study examines a moderated mediation model of public demand for regulatory intervention ensuing from a corporate crisis that entirely unfolded on social media platforms. The study finds that highly involved publics tend to attribute crisis responsibility more to the in-crisis company, and such attribution leads to stronger demand for regulatory intervention. However, the effects of issue involvement on public demands decrease when publics think they have collective efficacy to control crisis outcomes and that government has controllability over crisis outcomes. The study further finds that, in determining the degree of public demand, how publics attribute crisis responsibility is not as important as how they perceive government controllability. By delineating the relationships among issue involvement, responsibility attribution, perceived government controllability, and collective efficacy, this study outlines a comprehensive psychological mechanism of public demand for regulatory intervention during corporate crisis.

[1]  J. Robbennolt.  Outcome Severity and Judgments of “Responsibility”: A Meta‐Analytic Review , 2000 .

[2]  Keith N. Hampton.  Internet Use and the Concentration of Disadvantage: Glocalization and the Urban Underclass , 2010 .

[3]  Joon Soo Lim.  How a paracrisis situation is instigated by an online firestorm and visual mockery: Testing a paracrisis development model , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  J. Moon,et al.  'Implicit' and 'Explicit' CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2008 .

[5]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change , 1981 .

[6]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[7]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[8]  Tony Jaques.  Is issue management evolving or progressing towards extinction , 2012 .

[9]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[10]  W. Timothy Coombs,et al.  The paracrisis: The challenges created by publicly managing crisis prevention , 2012 .

[11]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action , 1986 .

[12]  W. T. Coombs,et al.  Protecting Organization Reputations During a Crisis: The Development and Application of Situational Crisis Communication Theory , 2007 .

[13]  James E. Katz,et al.  We Face, I Tweet: How Different Social Media Influence Political Participation through Collective and Internal Efficacy , 2017, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[14]  Jeong-Nam Kim,et al.  The Impact of Perceptual and Situational Factors on Environmental Communication: A Study of Citizen Engagement in China , 2019 .

[15]  Yoonhyeung Choi,et al.  Consumer response to crisis: Exploring the concept of involvement in Mattel product recalls , 2009 .

[16]  Yang Cheng,et al.  How Social Media Is Changing Crisis Communication Strategies: Evidence from the Updated Literature , 2018 .

[17]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed. , 2009 .

[18]  Tony Jaques,et al.  Issue and crisis management: Quicksand in the definitional landscape , 2009 .

[19]  Glen T. Cameron,et al.  Toward a Publics-Driven, Emotion-Based Conceptualization in Crisis Communication: Unearthing Dominant Emotions in Multi-Staged Testing of the Integrated Crisis Mapping (ICM) Model , 2012 .

[20]  F. Hillier-Brown,et al.  A systematic review of the effectiveness of individual, community and societal level interventions at reducing socioeconomic inequalities in obesity amongst children , 2014, BMC Public Health.

[21]  Yang Cheng.  Social Media Keep Buzzing! A Test of The Contingency Theory in China’s Red Cross Credibility Crisis , 2016 .

[22]  Guobin Yang,et al.  Contesting Food Safety in the Chinese Media: Between Hegemony and Counter-Hegemony , 2013, The China Quarterly.

[23]  Michael Chapman,et al.  Control, means-ends, and agency beliefs : A new conceptualization and its measurement during childhood , 1988 .

[24]  Alexander Kouzmin,et al.  Crises and Crisis Management: Toward Comprehensive Government Decision Making , 1997 .

[25]  J. Burger.  Negative reactions to increases in perceived personal control. , 1989 .

[26]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. , 1989 .

[27]  John L. Campbell.  Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? an institutional theory of corporate social responsibility , 2007 .

[28]  Verolien Cauberghe,et al.  Restoring reputations in times of crisis: An experimental study of the Situational Crisis Communication Theory and the moderating effects of locus of control , 2010 .

[29]  B. Harstad,et al.  Private Politics and Public Regulation , 2013 .

[30]  A. Bandura.  Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[31]  Jeong-Nam Kim,et al.  Problem Solving and Communicative Action: A Situational Theory of Problem Solving , 2011 .

[32]  M. Alicke,et al.  The role of a posteriori victim information in judgments of blame and sanction , 1989 .

[33]  Francis L. F. Lee.  The Perceptual Bases of Collective Efficacy and Protest Participation: The Case of Pro-Democracy Protests in Hong Kong , 2010 .

[34]  Z. Li.  Psychological empowerment on social media: Who are the empowered users? , 2016 .

[35]  Jang-Sun Hwang,et al.  Who drives a crisis? The diffusion of an issue through social networks , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  Brayden G. King,et al.  The Contentiousness of Markets: Politics, Social Movements, and Institutional Change in Markets , 2010 .

[37]  Alcides Velasquez,et al.  Youth collective activism through social media: The role of collective efficacy , 2015, New Media Soc..

[38]  G. Weary,et al.  Antecedents of causal uncertainty and perceived control: a prospective study , 1998 .

[39]  Sabine A. Einwiller,et al.  Journalists’ Coverage of Online Firestorms in German-Language News Media , 2017 .

[40]  B. Weiner.  An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. , 1985, Psychological review.

[41]  Sora Kim,et al.  Communication‐Mediated Psychological Mechanisms of Chinese Publics’ Post‐Crisis Corporate Associations and Government Associations , 2019, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management.

[42]  Erich J. Sommerfeldt.  Activist online resource mobilization: Relationship building features that fulfill resource dependen , 2011 .

[43]  Jukka Ojasalo,et al.  Managing customer expectations in professional services , 2001 .

[44]  Verolien Cauberghe,et al.  What makes crisis response strategies work? The impact of crisis involvement and message framing , 2014 .

[45]  J. Eccles,et al.  Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[46]  W. Bennett,et al.  THE LOGIC OF CONNECTIVE ACTION , 2012 .

[47]  Margaret E. Roberts,et al.  Reverse-engineering censorship in China: Randomized experimentation and participant observation , 2014, Science.

[48]  C. Brewin,et al.  Beyond locus of control: Attribution of responsibility for positive and negative outcomes , 1984 .

[49]  Betty Kaman Lee,et al.  Hong Kong Consumers' Evaluation in an Airline Crash: A Path Model Analysis , 2005 .

[50]  Edward F. McQuarrie,et al.  A Revised Product Involvement Inventory: Improved Usability and Validity , 1992 .

[51]  G. King,et al.  How the news media activate public expression and influence national agendas , 2017, Science.

[52]  Sora Kim,et al.  What’s Worse in Times of Product-Harm Crisis? Negative Corporate Ability or Negative CSR Reputation? , 2014 .

[53]  E. Skinner.  A guide to constructs of control. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[54]  Jonathan Borden,et al.  Linking Issue Management, Corporate Social Responsibility and Crisis Communication: Applying Balance Theory in Crisis and Issue Management , 2017 .

[55]  Christopher Marquis,et al.  Mobilization in the Internet Age: Internet Activism and Corporate Response , 2016 .

[56]  Brayden G. King,et al.  Good Firms, Good Targets: The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility, Reputation, and Activist Targeting , 2012 .

[57]  Charmine E. J. Härtel,et al.  Applying the involvement construct to organisational crises , 2000 .

[58]  G. Stoker.  Governance as theory: five propositions , 1998 .

[59]  Seoyeon Hong,et al.  Will Comments Change Your Opinion? The Persuasion Effects of Online Comments and Heuristic Cues in Crisis Communication , 2018 .

[60]  Clémence Vignal Lambret,et al.  Social Media Crisis Management: Aligning Corporate Response Strategies with Stakeholders’ Emotions Online , 2018 .

[61]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  Can online buddies and bandwagon cues enhance user participation in online health communities? , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[62]  Tim Bartley,et al.  Certifying Forests and Factories: States, Social Movements, and the Rise of Private Regulation in the Apparel and Forest Products Fields , 2003 .

[63]  Qianlan Wu.  The Making of a Market Economy in China: Transformation of Government Regulation of Market Development , 2007 .