Probabilistic risk assessment of emerging materials: case study of titanium dioxide nanoparticles

Abstract The development and use of emerging technologies such as nanomaterials can provide both benefits and risks to society. Emerging materials may promise to bring many technological advantages but may not be well characterized in terms of their production volumes, magnitude of emissions, behaviour in the environment and effects on living organisms. This uncertainty can present challenges to scientists developing these materials and persons responsible for defining and measuring their adverse impacts. Human health risk assessment is a method of identifying the intrinsic hazard of and quantifying the dose–response relationship and exposure to a chemical, to finally determine the estimation of risk. Commonly applied deterministic approaches may not sufficiently estimate and communicate the likelihood of risks from emerging technologies whose uncertainty is large. Probabilistic approaches allow for parameters in the risk assessment process to be defined by distributions instead of single deterministic values whose uncertainty could undermine the value of the assessment. A probabilistic approach was applied to the dose–response and exposure assessment of a case study involving the production of nanoparticles of titanium dioxide in seven different exposure scenarios. Only one exposure scenario showed a statistically significant level of risk. In the latter case, this involved dumping high volumes of nano-TiO2 powders into an open vessel with no personal protection equipment. The probabilistic approach not only provided the likelihood of but also the major contributing factors to the estimated risk (e.g. emission potential).

[1]  Theo Vermeire,et al.  Risk assessment of chemicals : an introduction , 2007 .

[2]  B. Lehnert,et al.  Correlation between particle size, in vivo particle persistence, and lung injury. , 1994, Environmental health perspectives.

[3]  W. Stahel,et al.  Log-normal Distributions across the Sciences: Keys and Clues , 2001 .

[4]  Kenny S. Crump,et al.  Calculation of Benchmark Doses from Continuous Data , 1995 .

[5]  Mary Shultz,et al.  Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar. , 2007, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[6]  Wolfgang Koch,et al.  Chronic Inhalation Exposure of Wistar Rats and two Different Strains of Mice to Diesel Engine Exhaust, Carbon Black, and Titanium Dioxide , 1995 .

[7]  Minnamari Vippola,et al.  Influence of relative humidity and physical load during storage on dustiness of inorganic nanomaterials: implications for testing and risk assessment , 2015, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[8]  Trevor Ogden,et al.  Annals of Occupational Hygiene at volume 50: many achievements, a few mistakes, and an interesting future. , 2006, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[9]  Theo Vermeire,et al.  Risk assessment of chemicals , 2021, Bioanalytical Tools in Water Quality Assessment.

[10]  John Pendergrass,et al.  Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies , 2007 .

[11]  Myrtill Simkó,et al.  Metrics, Dose, and Dose Concept: The Need for a Proper Dose Concept in the Risk Assessment of Nanoparticles , 2014, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[12]  Delphine Bard,et al.  Workplace air measurements and likelihood of exposure to manufactured nano-objects, agglomerates, and aggregates , 2013, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[13]  K. Donaldson,et al.  Toxicity of volcanic ash from Montserrat , 2005 .

[14]  Paul Hewett,et al.  Corrigenda - Models for nearly every occasion: Part II - Two box models , 2017, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[15]  Wout Slob,et al.  Exploring the Uncertainties in Cancer Risk Assessment Using the Integrated Probabilistic Risk Assessment (IPRA) Approach , 2014, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  Steffen Foss Hansen,et al.  Control banding tools for occupational exposure assessment of nanomaterials — Ready for use in a regulatory context? , 2016 .

[17]  M. L. Laucks,et al.  Aerosol Technology Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles , 2000 .

[18]  G. Lowry,et al.  Towards a definition of inorganic nanoparticles from an environmental, health and safety perspective. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[19]  Zhuo Yang,et al.  Toxicology of nanosized titanium dioxide: an update , 2015, Archives of Toxicology.

[20]  Jinshun Zhao,et al.  Titanium dioxide nanoparticles: a review of current toxicological data , 2013, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[21]  Michael Nentwich,et al.  Nano and Environment – Part II: Hazard potentials and risks (NanoTrust Dossier No. 027en – March 2012) , 2012 .

[22]  G. Truchon,et al.  Inhaled Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles: A Review of Their Pulmonary Responses with Particular Focus on the Agglomeration State , 2015 .

[23]  J. Everitt,et al.  Pulmonary responses of mice, rats, and hamsters to subchronic inhalation of ultrafine titanium dioxide particles. , 2004, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[24]  Reinhard Kreiling,et al.  A decision-making framework for the grouping and testing of nanomaterials (DF4nanoGrouping). , 2015, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[25]  Frances E. Zollers,et al.  The European Food Safety Authority: Towards coherence in food safety policy and practice , 2004 .

[26]  Philip Demokritou,et al.  NanoEHS – defining fundamental science needs: no easy feat when the simple itself is complex , 2016 .

[27]  M. Pieters,et al.  A Probabilistic Approach for Deriving Acceptable Human Intake Limits and Human Health Risks from Toxicological Studies: General Framework , 1998, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[28]  Tareq Hussein,et al.  Range-Finding Risk Assessment of Inhalation Exposure to Nanodiamonds in a Laboratory Environment , 2014, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[29]  Sylvia Bach,et al.  Determining the dustiness of powders--a comparison of three measuring devices. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[30]  K S Crump,et al.  A new method for determining allowable daily intakes. , 1984, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[31]  K. Hämeri,et al.  Industrial worker exposure to airborne particles during the packing of pigment and nanoscale titanium dioxide , 2012, Inhalation toxicology.

[32]  Christine Ogilvie Robichaud,et al.  Estimates of upper bounds and trends in nano-TiO2 production as a basis for exposure assessment. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  M. Viana,et al.  Process-generated nanoparticles from ceramic tile sintering: Emissions, exposure and environmental release. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[34]  K Y Chung,et al.  Dustiness testing and moving towards a biologically relevant dustiness index. , 1994, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[35]  David Rejeski,et al.  Nanotechnology in the real world: Redeveloping the nanomaterial consumer products inventory , 2015, Beilstein journal of nanotechnology.

[36]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Advanced Reach Tool (ART): development of the mechanistic model. , 2011, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[37]  Robert C MacPhail,et al.  Engineered nanomaterials: exposures, hazards, and risk prevention , 2011, Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology.

[38]  Antonio Pietroiusti,et al.  Health implications of engineered nanomaterials. , 2012, Nanoscale.

[39]  T G Vermeire,et al.  Opportunities for a probabilistic risk assessment of chemicals in the European Union. , 2001, Chemosphere.

[40]  Wouter Fransman,et al.  Workplace performance of a loose-fitting powered air purifying respirator during nanoparticle synthesis , 2015, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[41]  Craig A. Poland,et al.  Nanotoxicity: challenging the myth of nano-specific toxicity. , 2013, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[42]  P. Morrow,et al.  Pulmonary response to toner upon chronic inhalation exposure in rats. , 1991, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[43]  D. Bowman More than a Decade On: Mapping Today’s Regulatory and Policy Landscapes Following the Publication of Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties , 2017 .

[44]  A. Chesson,et al.  The Potential Risks Arising from Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies on Food and Feed Safety 1 Scientific Opinion of the Scientific Committee , 2009 .

[45]  Niels O. Breum,et al.  The rotating drum dustiness tester: Variability in dustiness in relation to sample mass, testing time, and surface adhesion , 1999 .

[46]  Pierre Pichat,et al.  State of the art and perspectives on materials and applications of photocatalysis over TiO2 , 2005 .

[47]  Derk H Brouwer,et al.  Size selective dustiness and exposure; simulated workplace comparisons. , 2006, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[48]  K. P. Lee,et al.  Pulmonary response of rats exposed to titanium dioxide (TiO2) by inhalation for two years. , 1985, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[49]  Jeffrey S Gift,et al.  Introduction to benchmark dose methods and U.S. EPA's benchmark dose software (BMDS) version 2.1.1. , 2011, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[50]  D. Huitema Election manifestoes as the meeting point for experts and politicians in the Netherlands: the case of the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) , 2007 .

[51]  Paul Hewett,et al.  Models for nearly every occasion: Part II - Two box models , 2017, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[52]  Muhammad Shakeel,et al.  Toxicity of Nano-Titanium Dioxide (TiO2-NP) Through Various Routes of Exposure: a Review , 2015, Biological Trace Element Research.

[53]  Katarzyna Sikorska,et al.  Toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in central nervous system. , 2015, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[54]  Wouter Fransman,et al.  Conceptual model for assessment of inhalation exposure to manufactured nanoparticles , 2011, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[55]  Thomas Armstrong,et al.  The Daubert Standard as Applied to Exposure Assessment Modeling Using the Two-Zone (NF/FF) Model Estimation of Indoor Air Breathing Zone Concentration as an Example , 2011, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[56]  Xiaobo Chen,et al.  Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: synthesis, properties, modifications, and applications. , 2007, Chemical reviews.

[57]  C. Kimmel,et al.  Dose-response assessment for developmental toxicity. II. Comparison of generic benchmark dose estimates with no observed adverse effect levels. , 1994, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[58]  Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment , 2008 .

[59]  M Levin,et al.  Testing the near field/far field model performance for prediction of particulate matter emissions in a paint factory. , 2015, Environmental science. Processes & impacts.

[60]  I. Iavicoli,et al.  Toxicological effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles: a review of in vivo studies , 2012 .

[61]  Joakim Pagels,et al.  Limitations in the Use of Unipolar Charging for Electrical Mobility Sizing Instruments: A Study of the Fast Mobility Particle Sizer , 2015 .

[62]  J. Cherrie The effect of room size and general ventilation on the relationship between near and far-field concentrations. , 1999, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.

[63]  James H. Vincent,et al.  Aerosol Science for Industrial Hygienists , 1995 .

[64]  Lang Tran,et al.  ITS-NANO - Prioritising nanosafety research to develop a stakeholder driven intelligent testing strategy , 2014, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[65]  K. Mølhave,et al.  Can We Trust Real Time Measurements of Lung Deposited Surface Area Concentrations in Dust from Powder Nanomaterials , 2016 .

[66]  T. Hussein,et al.  Concept to estimate regional inhalation dose of industrially synthesized nanoparticles. , 2012, ACS nano.

[67]  John A Tomenson,et al.  Titanium dioxide: inhalation toxicology and epidemiology. , 2005, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[68]  R. Hertzberg,et al.  A new method for determining allowable daily intakes. , 1986, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[69]  David B Warheit,et al.  Long-term pulmonary responses of three laboratory rodent species to subchronic inhalation of pigmentary titanium dioxide particles. , 2002, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[70]  Thomas Schneider,et al.  Combined single-drop and rotating drum dustiness test of fine to nanosize powders using a small drum. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[71]  K. Jensen,et al.  Airway exposure to silica-coated TiO2 nanoparticles induces pulmonary neutrophilia in mice. , 2010, Toxicological Sciences.

[72]  Gurumurthy Ramachandran,et al.  Bayesian modeling of exposure and airflow using two-zone models. , 2009, The Annals of occupational hygiene.