Agronomic characteristics and rain use efficiency of sorghum in a semiarid region

Sorghum culture highlighted in animal nutrition because it allows its cultivation of green conservation as silage. This study aimed to evaluate the divergence of agronomic and productive characteristics of 32 sorghum cultivars in the semiarid region. The randomized block design with three replications was used. It was evaluated the dry matter percentage (DM), fresh matter production (FMP) and dry matter production (DMP); stem proportion, panicle, and leaf blade in the plant DM; plant height, no plants ha -1 , stem diameter, leaf number, leaves and panicles length; rain use efficiency (RUE) in kg MS ha -1 mm -1 , and water accumulation (WA) in kg ha -1 and kg ha -1 mm -1 . The data were analyzed using the Scott-Knott procedure at a 5% significance level. The FMP and DMP showed the formation of two distinct groups, which may be crucial in choosing a more productive cultivar. Moreover, cultivar 17 stood out for presenting high leaf blade participation while cultivars 9, 19, 23, 24, and 32 in panicle participation in DM, which is considered nutritionally better due to higher digestibility than the stem. Besides, for the RUE and WA, two distinct groups were also formed, which can be great to determine cultivars that have higher xerophilic potential, and thus use them for the production of silage in semi-arid conditions. Experimental cultivars showed greater results than those commercials. Studies that evaluate the animal performance of cultivars (3, 6, 9, 17, 19, and 31), could be conducted to prove their nutritional values since these cultivars stood out for presenting interesting productive characteristics.

[1]  A. Mahmood,et al.  Combined cultivar and harvest time to enhance biomass and methane yield in sorghum under warm dry conditions in Pakistan , 2019, Industrial Crops and Products.

[2]  R. Schaffert,et al.  Composition and growth of sorghum biomass genotypes for ethanol production , 2019, Biomass and Bioenergy.

[3]  R. Jacovetti,et al.  MILHETO COMO SILAGEM COMPARADO A GRAMÍNEAS TRADICIONAIS: ASPECTOS QUANTITATIVOS, QUALITATIVOS E ECONÔMICOS , 2018, Ciência Animal Brasileira.

[4]  Caio Fortes,et al.  DESEMPENHO AGRONÔMICO DE HÍBRIDOS DE SORGO BIOMASSA NAS CONDIÇÕES EDAFOCLIMÁTICAS DO TOCANTINS , 2018, ENERGIA NA AGRICULTURA.

[5]  A. VanLoocke,et al.  Biomass sorghum and maize have similar water-use-efficiency under non-drought conditions in the rain-fed Midwest U.S. , 2017 .

[6]  A. T. Bruzi,et al.  Agronomic and energetic potential of biomass sorghum genotypes. , 2015 .

[7]  G. Carvalho,et al.  Agronomic evaluation of 32 sorghum cultivars in the Brazilian semi-arid region , 2014 .

[8]  William L. Rooney,et al.  Biomass production, water and nitrogen use efficiency in photoperiod-sensitive sorghum in the Texas High Plains , 2014 .

[9]  C. C. Jobim,et al.  Produção e composição química de híbridos de sorgo e de milho para silagem , 2013 .

[10]  E. M. Santos,et al.  Características agronômicas e eficiência do uso da chuva em cultivares de sorgo no semiárido , 2013 .

[11]  R. Baumhardt,et al.  Comparison of sorghum classes for grain and forage yield and forage nutritive value , 2013 .

[12]  Bruce A. McCarl,et al.  High biomass yield energy sorghum: developing a genetic model for C4 grass bioenergy crops , 2012 .

[13]  L. R. Pereira,et al.  Agronomic characteristics of forage sorghum cultivars for silage production in the lower middle San Francisco Valley - doi: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v35i1.13072 , 2012 .

[14]  R. Edvan,et al.  Agronomic divergence of sorghum hybrids for silage yield in the semiarid region of Paraiba , 2011 .

[15]  Sidnei Tavares dos Reis,et al.  AVALIAÇÃO DE GENÓTIPOS DE SORGO EM PRIMEIRO CORTE E REBROTA PARA PRODUÇÃO DE SILAGEM , 2010 .

[16]  E. E. Cunha,et al.  Caracterização de genótipos e estimativa de parâmetros genéticos de características produtivas de sorgo forrageiro , 2010 .

[17]  Ahmet Ertek,et al.  Irrigation scheduling based on pan evaporation values for cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) grown under field conditions , 2006 .

[18]  I. Atis,et al.  Effect of harvesting time on yield, composition and forage quality of some forage sorghum cultivars. , 2012 .

[19]  J. Neiva,et al.  Comportamento agronômico e composição químico-bromatológico de cultivares de sorgo forrageiro no Estado do Ceará , 2006 .