Beat-to-Beat, Reading-to-Reading, and Day-to-Day Blood Pressure Variability in Relation to Organ Damage in Untreated Chinese

Whether target organ damage is associated with blood pressure (BP) variability independent of level remains debated. We assessed these associations from 10-minute beat-to-beat, 24-hour ambulatory, and 7-day home BP recordings in 256 untreated subjects referred to a hypertension clinic. BP variability indices were variability independent of the mean, maximum–minimum difference, and average real variability. Effect sizes (standardized &bgr;) were computed using multivariable regression models. In beat-to-beat recordings, left ventricular mass index (n=128) was not (P≥0.18) associated with systolic BP but increased with all 3 systolic variability indices (+2.97–3.53 g/m2; P<0.04); the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio increased (P⩽0.03) with systolic BP (+1.14–1.17 mg/mmol) and maximum–minimum difference (+1.18 mg/mmol); and pulse wave velocity increased with systolic BP (+0.69 m/s; P<0.001). In 24-hour recordings, all 3 indices of organ damage increased (P<0.03) with systolic BP, whereas the associations with BP variability were nonsignificant (P≥0.15) except for increases in pulse wave velocity (P<0.05) with variability independent of the mean (+0.16 m/s) and maximum–minimum difference (+0.17 m/s). In home recordings, the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (+1.27–1.30 mg/mmol) and pulse wave velocity (+0.36–0.40 m/s) increased (P<0.05) with systolic BP, whereas all associations of target organ damage with the variability indices were nonsignificant (P≥0.07). In conclusion, while accounting for BP level, associations of target organ damage with BP variability were readily detectable in beat-to-beat recordings, least noticeable in home recordings, with 24-hour ambulatory monitoring being informative only for pulse wave velocity.

[1]  G Parati,et al.  Feasibility of ambulatory, continuous 24-hour finger arterial pressure recording. , 1993, Hypertension.

[2]  J. Staessen,et al.  Predictive role of the nighttime blood pressure. , 2011, Hypertension.

[3]  J. Manson,et al.  Association Between Annual Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability and Stroke in Postmenopausal Women: Data From the Women's Health Initiative , 2012, Hypertension.

[4]  M. Fantone,et al.  Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus , 1997, Diabetes Care.

[5]  D. Seals,et al.  Age-associated changes in cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity are related to central arterial compliance. , 2001, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[6]  R. Asmar,et al.  Evaluation of two devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol: the Omron M5-I and the Omron 705IT , 2003, Blood pressure monitoring.

[7]  K. Reynolds,et al.  The Relationship Between Visit-to-Visit Variability in Systolic Blood Pressure and All-Cause Mortality in the General Population: Findings From NHANES III, 1988 to 1994 , 2011, Hypertension.

[8]  R. de Caterina,et al.  Increased short-term blood pressure variability is associated with early left ventricular systolic dysfunction in newly diagnosed untreated hypertensive patients , 2013, Journal of hypertension.

[9]  E. O’Brien,et al.  Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension , 2010, The Lancet.

[10]  G Parati,et al.  Relationship of 24-hour blood pressure mean and variability to severity of target-organ damage in hypertension. , 1987, Journal of hypertension.

[11]  J. Staessen,et al.  Association of Target Organ Damage With 24-Hour Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Levels and Hypertension Subtypes in Untreated Chinese , 2014, Hypertension.

[12]  Jan A. Staessen,et al.  Analysis of the diurnal blood pressure curve , 1992 .

[13]  L. Bang,et al.  No impact of blood pressure variability on microalbuminuria and left ventricular geometry: analysis of daytime variation, diurnal variation and ‘white coat’ effect , 2001, Blood pressure monitoring.

[14]  K. Kario,et al.  Maximum Value of Home Blood Pressure: A Novel Indicator of Target Organ Damage in Hypertension , 2011, Hypertension.

[15]  H. Rakugi,et al.  The impact of visit-to-visit variability in blood pressure on renal function , 2012, Hypertension Research.

[16]  G. Schillaci,et al.  Lack of association between blood pressure variability and left ventricular mass in essential hypertension. , 1998, American journal of hypertension.

[17]  Gianfranco Parati,et al.  Assessment and management of blood-pressure variability , 2014, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[18]  Ryusuke Inoue,et al.  Ambulatory blood pressure, blood pressure variability and the prevalence of carotid artery alteration: the Ohasama study , 2007, Journal of hypertension.

[19]  D. Bennett,et al.  Blood pressure and cardiovascular disease in the Asia Pacific region. , 2003, Journal of hypertension.

[20]  J. Peňáz Criteria for set point estimation in the volume clamp method of blood pressure measurement. , 1992, Physiological research.

[21]  J. Staessen,et al.  Within-Subject Blood Pressure Level—Not Variability—Predicts Fatal and Nonfatal Outcomes in a General Population , 2012, Hypertension.

[22]  J. Staessen,et al.  Home Blood Pressure Variability as Cardiovascular Risk Factor in the Population of Ohasama , 2013, Hypertension.

[23]  Rhonda L. Meier,et al.  Relationship Between Sympathetic Baroreflex Sensitivity and Arterial Stiffness in Elderly Men and Women , 2012, Hypertension.

[24]  M. Kollai,et al.  Relation between baroreflex sensitivity and carotid artery elasticity in healthy humans. , 1996, The American journal of physiology.

[25]  D. P. Veerman,et al.  Relationship of steady state and ambulatory blood pressure variability to left ventricular mass and urinary albumin excretion in essential hypertension. , 1996, American journal of hypertension.

[26]  M. Kikuya,et al.  Prognostic Significance of Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Variabilities: The Ohasama Study , 2000, Hypertension.

[27]  F. Cuccurullo,et al.  Blood pressure variability and cardiovascular risk in treated hypertensive patients. , 2006, American journal of hypertension.

[28]  E. O’Brien,et al.  How many measurements are needed to estimate blood pressure variability without loss of prognostic information? , 2014, American journal of hypertension.

[29]  J. Gardin,et al.  American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for use of echocardiography in clinical trials. , 2004, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[30]  Teemu J Niiranen,et al.  Prognostic Value of the Variability in Home-Measured Blood Pressure and Heart Rate: The Finn-Home Study , 2012, Hypertension.

[31]  Yutaka Imai,et al.  European Society of Hypertension recommendations for conventional, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement , 2003, Journal of hypertension.

[32]  Tikhonoff,et al.  International Database on Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes Investigators. Prognostic Value of Reading-to-Reading Blood Pressure Variability Over 24 Hours in 8938 Subjects from 11 Populations. (vol 55, pg 1049, 2010) , 2010 .

[33]  E. Dolan,et al.  Blood pressure variability: clarity for clinical practice. , 2010, Hypertension.

[34]  Salvador A. Pintos,et al.  A reliable index for the prognostic significance of blood pressure variability , 2005, Journal of hypertension.

[35]  E. O’Brien,et al.  Prognostic Value of Reading-to-Reading Blood Pressure Variability Over 24 Hours in 8938 Subjects From 11 Populations , 2010, Hypertension.

[36]  N. Malan,et al.  Validation of the Finometer device for measurement of blood pressure in black women , 2004, Journal of Human Hypertension.

[37]  G. Leoncini,et al.  Blood pressure variability and multiple organ damage in primary hypertension , 2013, Journal of Human Hypertension.

[38]  R. de Caterina,et al.  Awake Systolic Blood Pressure Variability Correlates With Target-Organ Damage in Hypertensive Subjects , 2007, Hypertension.