Can Project Management Learn Anything from Studies of Failure in Complex Systems?

Studies of failure in complex technology systems point to the role of non-linear interactions, “emergence,” conflicting objectives, overly centralized management and “multi-nodality” in precipitating this failure. At the same time, studies of technology failure and safety in high-reliability organizations point to the benefits of what might be termed an “interventionist” approach to managing. Drawing on the insights of these studies, we explore three case studies of complex projects to show the importance of ongoing management “interventions” in preventing project failure. We conclude that “interventionism,” as a balance to overreliance on centralized project management systems, may be a fruitful approach to project management in the context of complex projects.

[1]  O. Moselhi,et al.  Design impact of construction fast-track , 1988 .

[2]  Todd R. La Porte,et al.  Large technical systems, institutional surprises, and challenges to political legitimacy , 1994 .

[3]  J. Thomas,et al.  Making Sense of Project Management , 2000 .

[4]  Ian McLoughlin,et al.  Trains, Cranes and Drains: Customer Requirements in Long-term Engineering Projects as a Knowledge Management Problem , 2003 .

[5]  Terry Williams,et al.  Modelling Complex Projects , 2001 .

[6]  R. Daft,et al.  Can Organization Studies Begin to Break Out of the Normal Science Straitjacket? An Editorial Essay , 1990 .

[7]  Paul R. Schulman,et al.  The Negotiated Order of Organizational Reliability , 1993 .

[8]  Mary Ann Glynn,et al.  Creativity and technological learning: the roles of organization architecture and crisis in large-scale projects , 2000 .

[9]  J. Law,et al.  Ladbroke Grove, or How to Think about Failing Systems , 2000 .

[10]  B. Wynne.  Unruly Technology: Practical Rules, Impractical Discourses and Public Understanding , 1988 .

[11]  Michael Ball,et al.  Rebuilding Construction: Economic Change and the British Construction Industry , 1988 .

[12]  K. Dooley,et al.  Explaining Complex Organizational Dynamics , 1999 .

[13]  D. Gann,et al.  Integrated Solutions: The new economy between manufacturing and services , 2001 .

[14]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science , 1999, Organization Science.

[15]  M. Engwall.  No project is an island: linking projects to history and context , 2003 .

[16]  Karin Garrety,et al.  Integrating communities of practice in technology development projects , 2004 .

[17]  Chris Ivory,et al.  Shifting the Goal Posts for Design Management in Capital Goods Projects: 'Design for Maintainability' , 2003 .

[18]  T. Laporte,et al.  Working in Practice But Not in Theory: Theoretical Challenges of “High-Reliability Organizations” , 1991 .

[19]  Ken Rose.  Book Review: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) - 2000 Edition , 2001 .

[20]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change ed. by Wiebe E. Bijker, John Law (review) , 1994, Technology and Culture.

[21]  J. E. Groves,et al.  Made in America: Science, Technology and American Modernist Poets , 1989 .