Welcoming Robots into the Moral Circle: A Defence of Ethical Behaviourism

Can robots have significant moral status? This is an emerging topic of debate among roboticists and ethicists. This paper makes three contributions to this debate. First, it presents a theory—‘ethical behaviourism’—which holds that robots can have significant moral status if they are roughly performatively equivalent to other entities that have significant moral status. This theory is then defended from seven objections. Second, taking this theoretical position onboard, it is argued that the performative threshold that robots need to cross in order to be afforded significant moral status may not be that high and that they may soon cross it (if they haven’t done so already). Finally, the implications of this for our procreative duties to robots are considered, and it is argued that we may need to take seriously a duty of ‘procreative beneficence’ towards robots.

[1]  David Levy,et al.  The Ethical Treatment of Artificially Conscious Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[2]  C. Kaczor The Ethics of Abortion , 2014 .

[3]  M. Bennett,et al.  Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience , 2006, History & Philosophy of Psychology.

[4]  First, Do No Harm: Generalized Procreative Non‐Maleficence , 2017, Bioethics.

[5]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  Growing Moral Relations , 2012 .

[6]  Michael Hauskeller,et al.  Automatic Sweethearts for Transhumanists , 2017 .

[7]  J. Savulescu Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children. , 2001, Bioethics.

[8]  Jeff Sebo The Moral Problem of Other Minds , 2018 .

[9]  J. ADAM CARTER,et al.  Is Having Your Computer Compromised a Personal Assault? The Ethics of Extended Cognition , 2016, Journal of the American Philosophical Association.

[10]  Alexander A. Guerrero Don’t Know, Don’t Kill: Moral Ignorance, Culpability, and Caution , 2007 .

[11]  J. Bryson Robots should be slaves , 2010 .

[12]  T. Lockhart,et al.  Moral uncertainty and its consequences , 2000 .

[13]  T. Regan The Case for Animal Rights , 1983 .

[14]  C. Overall Why Have Children?: The Ethical Debate , 2012 .

[15]  Roman V Yampolskiy,et al.  Reviewing Tests for Machine Consciousness , 2019 .

[16]  John Danaher,et al.  Why We Should Create Artificial Offspring: Meaning and the Collective Afterlife , 2017, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[17]  M. Coeckelbergh,et al.  Growing Moral Relations: Critique of Moral Status Ascription , 2012 .

[18]  Evan Selinger,et al.  Robot Eyes Wide Shut: Understanding Dishonest Anthropomorphism , 2019, FAT.

[19]  Lily Frank,et al.  From sex robots to love robots: is mutual love with a robot possible? , 2017 .

[20]  Nicole A. Vincent,et al.  Happiness, Cerebroscopes and Incorrigibility: Prospects for Neuroeudaimonia , 2016 .

[21]  P. Singer Speciesism and Moral Status , 2009 .

[22]  B. Weatherson Running risks morally , 2013, Philosophical Studies.

[23]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  Response to “The Problem of the Question About Animal Ethics” by Michal Piekarski , 2016 .

[24]  J. Searle,et al.  Neuroscience and Philosophy: Brain, Mind, and Language , 2007 .

[25]  Rebecca Tuvel In Defense of Transracialism , 2017, Hypatia.

[26]  David J. Gunkel The other question: can and should robots have rights? , 2017, Ethics and Information Technology.

[27]  Eric Schwitzgebel,et al.  A Defense of the Rights of Artificial Intelligences , 2015 .

[28]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  Facing Animals: A Relational, Other-Oriented Approach to Moral Standing , 2014 .

[29]  Joanna Bryson,et al.  Patiency is not a virtue: the design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics , 2018, Ethics and Information Technology.

[30]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[31]  David J. Gunkel The Machine Question: Critical Perspectives on AI, Robots, and Ethics , 2012 .

[32]  D. Chalmers The Conscious Mind , 1996 .

[33]  Stephen Puryear Schopenhauer on the Rights of Animals , 2017 .

[34]  Erica L. Neely Machines and the Moral Community , 2014 .

[35]  A. Manser,et al.  The Expanding Circle , 2020, The Murder of Professor Schlick.

[36]  B. Saunders Why Procreative Preferences May Be Moral – and Why it May Not Matter If They Aren't , 2015, Bioethics.

[37]  Robert Sparrow Can machines be people? Reflections on the Turing triage test , 2012 .

[38]  Eilionóir Flynn,et al.  The right to legal agency: domination, disability and the protections of Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities , 2017, International Journal of Law in Context.

[39]  Joanna Bryson,et al.  Of, for, and by the people: the legal lacuna of synthetic persons , 2017, Artificial Intelligence and Law.