Optimal deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus—a computational study

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus, typically with periodic, high frequency pulse trains, has proven to be an effective treatment for the motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Here, we use a biophysically-based model of spiking cells in the basal ganglia (Terman et al., Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 2963–976, 2002; Rubin and Terman, Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 16, 211–235, 2004) to provide computational evidence that alternative temporal patterns of DBS inputs might be equally effective as the standard high-frequency waveforms, but require lower amplitudes. Within this model, DBS performance is assessed in two ways. First, we determine the extent to which DBS causes Gpi (globus pallidus pars interna) synaptic outputs, which are burstlike and synchronized in the unstimulated Parkinsonian state, to cease their pathological modulation of simulated thalamocortical cells. Second, we evaluate how DBS affects the GPi cells’ auto- and cross-correlograms. In both cases, a nonlinear closed-loop learning algorithm identifies effective DBS inputs that are optimized to have minimal strength. The network dynamics that result differ from the regular, entrained firing which some previous studies have associated with conventional high-frequency DBS. This type of optimized solution is also found with heterogeneity in both the intrinsic network dynamics and the strength of DBS inputs received at various cells. Such alternative DBS inputs could potentially be identified, guided by the model-free learning algorithm, in experimental or eventual clinical settings.

[1]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[2]  H. Bergman,et al.  Neurons in the globus pallidus do not show correlated activity in the normal monkey, but phase-locked oscillations appear in the MPTP model of parkinsonism. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  E. Bézard,et al.  High frequency stimulation of the internal Globus Pallidus (GPi) simultaneously improves parkinsonian symptoms and reduces the firing frequency of GPi neurons in the MPTP-treated monkey , 1996, Neuroscience Letters.

[4]  E. Vaadia,et al.  Physiological aspects of information processing in the basal ganglia of normal and parkinsonian primates , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[5]  P. Tass Phase Resetting in Medicine and Biology , 1999 .

[6]  M. Hariz,et al.  Tolerance and Tremor Rebound following Long-Term Chronic Thalamic Stimulation for Parkinsonian and Essential Tremor , 2000, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery.

[7]  A. Benabid,et al.  Effect of high-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus on the neuronal activities of the substantia nigra pars reticulata and ventrolateral nucleus of the thalamus in the rat , 2000, Neuroscience.

[8]  M. Brin,et al.  The role of deep brain stimulation as a surgical treatment for Parkinson's disease. , 2000, Neurology.

[9]  A. Morel,et al.  Single-unit analysis of the pallidum, thalamus and subthalamic nucleus in parkinsonian patients , 2000, Neuroscience.

[10]  F. Windels,et al.  Effects of high frequency stimulation of subthalamic nucleus on extracellular glutamate and GABA in substantia nigra and globus pallidus in the normal rat , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.

[11]  B. Erwin,et al.  Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation and future technical developments , 2000, Neurological research.

[12]  P. Krack,et al.  Deep-brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus or the pars interna of the globus pallidus in Parkinson's disease. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Peter A. Tass,et al.  Desynchronizing double-pulse phase resetting and application to deep brain stimulation , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[14]  M. Rizzone,et al.  Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease: effects of variation in stimulation parameters , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[15]  K. Lyons,et al.  Long term safety and efficacy of unilateral deep brain stimulation of the thalamus for parkinsonian tremor , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[16]  C. Hammond,et al.  High-frequency stimulation produces a transient blockade of voltage-gated currents in subthalamic neurons. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Extracellular stimulation of central neurons: influence of stimulus waveform and frequency on neuronal output. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Charles J. Wilson,et al.  Activity Patterns in a Model for the Subthalamopallidal Network of the Basal Ganglia , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Peter A. Tass,et al.  A model of desynchronizing deep brain stimulation with a demand-controlled coordinated reset of neural subpopulations , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[20]  J. Saint-Cyr,et al.  Long-term follow up of bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in patients with advanced Parkinson disease. , 2003, Journal of neurosurgery.

[21]  J. Deniau,et al.  Spontaneous and Evoked Activity of Substantia Nigra Pars Reticulata Neurons during High-Frequency Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  J. Vitek,et al.  Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus Changes the Firing Pattern of Pallidal Neurons , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  A. Benabid,et al.  Five-year follow-up of bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson's disease. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  A. Benabid Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[25]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Cellular effects of deep brain stimulation: model-based analysis of activation and inhibition. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Jonathan E. Rubin,et al.  High Frequency Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus Eliminates Pathological Thalamic Rhythmicity in a Computational Model , 2004, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[27]  J. Obeso,et al.  Efficacy of deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson’s disease 4 years after surgery: double blind and open label evaluation , 2004, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[28]  M. Rosenblum,et al.  Delayed feedback control of collective synchrony: an approach to suppression of pathological brain rhythms. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[29]  Peter A. Tass,et al.  Delayed feedback control of synchronization in locally coupled neuronal networks , 2005, Neurocomputing.

[30]  Christian Hauptmann,et al.  Effective desynchronization by nonlinear delayed feedback. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[31]  M. Okun,et al.  Management of referred deep brain stimulation failures: a retrospective analysis from 2 movement disorders centers. , 2005, Archives of neurology.

[32]  J. Obeso,et al.  Bilateral deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a multicentre study with 4 years follow-up. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  J. Mink,et al.  Deep brain stimulation. , 2006, Annual review of neuroscience.

[34]  Eric T. Shea-Brown,et al.  Toward closed-loop optimization of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: concepts and lessons from a computational model , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[35]  P. McClintock Phase resetting in medicine and biology , 2008 .