Asynchronous Time-Sensitive Networking for 5G Backhauling

Fifth Generation (5G) phase 2 rollouts are around the corner to make mobile ultra-reliable and low-latency services a reality. However, to realize that scenario, besides the new 5G built-in Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication (URLLC) capabilities, it is required to provide a substrate network with deterministic Qual-ity-of-Service support for interconnecting the different 5G network functions and services. Time-Sensitive Networking (TSN) appears as an appealing network technology to meet the 5G connectivity needs in many scenarios involving critical services and their coexistence with Mobile Broadband traffic. In this article, we delve into the adoption of asynchronous TSN for 5G backhauling and some of the relevant related aspects. We start motivating TSN and introducing its mainstays. Then, we provide a comprehensive overview of the architecture and operation of the Asynchronous Traffic Shaper (ATS), the building block of asynchronous TSN. Next, a management framework based on ETSI Zero-touch network and Service Management (ZSM) and Abstraction and Control of Traffic Engineered Networks (ACTN) reference models is presented for enabling the TSN transport network slicing and its interworking with Fifth Generation (5G) for backhauling. Then we cover the flow allocation problem in asynchronous TSNs and the importance of Machine Learning techniques for assisting it. Last, we present a simulation-based proof-of-concept (PoC) to assess the capacity of ATS-based forwarding planes for accommodating 5G data flows.

[1]  Tarik Taleb,et al.  Dynamic Multilevel Priority Packet Scheduling Scheme for Wireless Sensor Network , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[2]  Soheil Samii,et al.  Urgency-Based Scheduler for Time-Sensitive Switched Ethernet Networks , 2016, 2016 28th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS).

[3]  Tarik Taleb,et al.  Network Slicing and Softwarization: A Survey on Principles, Enabling Technologies, and Solutions , 2018, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[4]  Jean-Yves Le Boudec.  A Theory of Traffic Regulators for Deterministic Networks With Application to Interleaved Regulators , 2018, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[5]  Daniele Ceccarelli,et al.  Framework for Abstraction and Control of TE Networks (ACTN) , 2018, RFC.

[6]  Silviu S. Craciunas,et al.  Traffic Planning for Time-Sensitive Communication , 2018, IEEE Communications Standards Magazine.

[7]  Tarik Taleb,et al.  Orchestrating 5G Network Slices to Support Industrial Internet and to Shape Next-Generation Smart Factories , 2019, IEEE Network.

[8]  Soheil Samii,et al.  Synthesis of Queue and Priority Assignment for Asynchronous Traffic Shaping in Switched Ethernet , 2017, 2017 IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS).

[9]  Tarik Taleb,et al.  LEARNET: Reinforcement Learning Based Flow Scheduling for Asynchronous Deterministic Networks , 2020, ICC 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[10]  Tarik Taleb,et al.  AI-Driven Zero Touch Network and Service Management in 5G and Beyond: Challenges and Research Directions , 2020, IEEE Network.

[11]  Mérouane Debbah,et al.  Wireless Networks Design in the Era of Deep Learning: Model-Based, AI-Based, or Both? , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[12]  Tarik Taleb,et al.  EiF: Toward an Elastic IoT Fog Framework for AI Services , 2019, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[13]  Tarik Taleb,et al.  On Multi-Domain Network Slicing Orchestration Architecture and Federated Resource Control , 2019, IEEE Network.

[14]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Ultra-Low Latency (ULL) Networks: The IEEE TSN and IETF DetNet Standards and Related 5G ULL Research , 2018, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.