Optimal pricing and core acquisition strategy for a hybrid manufacturing/remanufacturing system

Remanufacturing is one of the product recovery options where the quality of used products (cores) is upgraded to ‘as-good-as-new’ conditions. In this article, we consider a monopolist firm selling new and remanufactured products to quality-conscious primary customers and price-sensitive secondary customers, respectively, with one-way substitution, i.e. some primary customers may substitute new products by remanufactured products while secondary customers can never afford to buy new products. We develop economic models under two scenarios – when the supply of cores is unconstrained and when manufacturers have to procure cores at an acquisition price. The major observations of the article are as follows. A firm is better off when there is no constraint on the supply of cores. Even when cores have to be acquired at an acquisition price, the profitability is higher than that when the firm does not engage in remanufacturing activities. When a larger number of primary customers replace new products with remanufactured products, there is partial cannibalization of new product sales; however, the combined market share and profitability of the firm increase. When core supply is constrained and customers are less sensitive to core prices, the limited supply of cores may render remanufacturing an infeasible option for the firm. Therefore, firms should not only generate awareness among primary customers to buy remanufactured products, but also step up efforts to ensure a steady supply of cores. We conclude the article with managerial implications and directions for future research.

[1]  Kevin J. Gaudette,et al.  Remanufacturing: The next great opportunity for boosting US productivity , 2003 .

[2]  Ismail Serdar Bakal,et al.  Effects of Random Yield in Remanufacturing with Price‐Sensitive Supply and Demand , 2006 .

[3]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Closed - Loop Supply Chain Models with Product Remanufacturing , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[4]  Shaligram Pokharel,et al.  Pricing used products for remanufacturing , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Wenbo Shi,et al.  A Study of Product Weight and Collection Rate in Closed-Loop Supply Chains With Recycling , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[6]  L. Beril Toktay,et al.  How Collection Cost Structure Drives a Manufacturer's Reverse Channel Choice , 2013 .

[7]  S. Mitra Revenue management for remanufactured products , 2007 .

[8]  L. V. Wassenhove,et al.  MANAGING PRODUCT RETURNS FOR REMANUFACTURING , 2001 .

[9]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Remanufacturing as a Marketing Strategy , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Sean X. Zhou,et al.  Technical Note - Optimal Product Acquisition, Pricing, and Inventory Management for Systems with Remanufacturing , 2011, Oper. Res..

[11]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Product Reuse Economics in Closed‐Loop Supply Chain Research , 2008 .

[12]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  So What If Remanufacturing Cannibalizes My New Product Sales? , 2010 .

[13]  Marc Salomon,et al.  Strategic Issues in Product Recovery Management , 1995 .

[14]  Serra Caner Bulmus,et al.  Optimal core acquisition and pricing strategies for hybrid manufacturing and remanufacturing systems , 2014 .

[15]  Jayashankar M. Swaminathan,et al.  Managing New and Remanufactured Products , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[16]  Stefan Minner,et al.  Dynamic product acquisition in closed loop supply chains , 2012 .

[17]  Anton Ovchinnikov,et al.  Revenue and Cost Management for Remanufactured Products , 2011 .

[18]  Flora Chia-I Chang,et al.  The economics of a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing , 2012, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[19]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  Production, Manufacturing and Logistics Competitive advantage through take-back of used products , 2005 .

[20]  C. Carter,et al.  REVERSE LOGISTICS: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE AND FRAMEWORK FOR FUTURE INVESTIGATION , 1998 .

[21]  H. Groenevelt,et al.  COMPETITION IN REMANUFACTURING , 2001 .

[22]  Necati Aras,et al.  Optimal Prices and Trade-in Rebates for Durable, Remanufacturable Products , 2005, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[23]  L. Beril Toktay,et al.  Market Segmentation and Product Technology Selection for Remanufacturable Products , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[24]  Shad Dowlatshahi,et al.  Developing a Theory of Reverse Logistics , 2000, Interfaces.

[25]  Mark E. Ferguson,et al.  The Effect of Competition on Recovery Strategies , 2006 .

[26]  Ruud H. Teunter,et al.  Matching Demand and Supply to Maximize Profits from Remanufacturing , 2003, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[27]  Cheng-Han Wu OEM product design in a price competition with remanufactured product , 2013 .

[28]  V. Daniel R. Guide,et al.  The Potential for Cannibalization of New Products Sales by Remanufactured Products , 2010, Decis. Sci..

[29]  Gendao Li,et al.  The value of dynamic pricing for cores in remanufacturing with backorders , 2013, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[30]  Jayashankar M. Swaminathan,et al.  Managing new and differentiated remanufactured products , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  L. Beril Toktay,et al.  Cost Allocation in Manufacturing–Remanufacturing Operations , 2011 .

[32]  William W. Sharkey,et al.  Cost allocation , 1996 .

[33]  Richard Staelin,et al.  An Industry Equilibrium Analysis of Downstream Vertical Integration , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[34]  Xiang Li,et al.  Optimal acquisition and production policy in a hybrid manufacturing/remanufacturing system with core acquisition at different quality levels , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  V. Daniel R. Guide,et al.  OR FORUM - The Evolution of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Research , 2009, Oper. Res..

[36]  Jen-Ming Chen,et al.  Dynamic pricing for new and remanufactured products in a closed-loop supply chain , 2013 .