Transmission networks of SARS-CoV-2 in Coastal Kenya during the first two waves: A retrospective genomic study

Background: Detailed understanding of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) regional transmission networks within sub-Saharan Africa is key for guiding local public health interventions against the pandemic. Methods: Here, we analysed 1139 SARS-CoV-2 genomes from positive samples collected between March 2020 and February 2021 across six counties of Coastal Kenya (Mombasa, Kilifi, Taita Taveta, Kwale, Tana River, and Lamu) to infer virus introductions and local transmission patterns during the first two waves of infections. Virus importations were inferred using ancestral state reconstruction, and virus dispersal between counties was estimated using discrete phylogeographic analysis. Results: During Wave 1, 23 distinct Pango lineages were detected across the six counties, while during Wave 2, 29 lineages were detected; 9 of which occurred in both waves and 4 seemed to be Kenya specific (B.1.530, B.1.549, B.1.596.1, and N.8). Most of the sequenced infections belonged to lineage B.1 (n = 723, 63%), which predominated in both Wave 1 (73%, followed by lineages N.8 [6%] and B.1.1 [6%]) and Wave 2 (56%, followed by lineages B.1.549 [21%] and B.1.530 [5%]). Over the study period, we estimated 280 SARS-CoV-2 virus importations into Coastal Kenya. Mombasa City, a vital tourist and commercial centre for the region, was a major route for virus imports, most of which occurred during Wave 1, when many Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) government restrictions were still in force. In Wave 2, inter-county transmission predominated, resulting in the emergence of local transmission chains and diversity. Conclusions: Our analysis supports moving COVID-19 control strategies in the region from a focus on international travel to strategies that will reduce local transmission. Funding: This work was funded by The Wellcome (grant numbers: 220985, 203077/Z/16/Z, 220977/Z/20/Z, and 222574/Z/21/Z) and the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), project references: 17/63/and 16/136/33 using UK Aid from the UK government to support global health research, The UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the funding agencies.

[1]  Gemma L. Kay,et al.  Genomic epidemiology and the role of international and regional travel in the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in Zimbabwe: a retrospective study of routinely collected surveillance data , 2021, The Lancet Global Health.

[2]  N. Loman,et al.  Genomic Sequencing of SARS-COV-2 in Rwanda: evolution and regional dynamics , 2021, medRxiv.

[3]  S. Majumdar,et al.  A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker) , 2021, Nature Human Behaviour.

[4]  R. Guleria,et al.  Seroprevalence of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare workers & implications of infection control practice in India , 2021, The Indian journal of medical research.

[5]  A. Sigal,et al.  Sixteen novel lineages of SARS-CoV-2 in South Africa , 2021, Nature Medicine.

[6]  Zhènglì Shí,et al.  Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 , 2020, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[7]  Andrew D Smith,et al.  Improvements to the ARTIC multiplex PCR method for SARS-CoV-2 genome sequencing using nanopore , 2020, bioRxiv.

[8]  Khadija Said Mohammed,et al.  Pooled testing conserves SARS-CoV-2 laboratory resources and improves test turn-around time: experience on the Kenyan Coast. , 2020, Wellcome open research.

[9]  Richard Molenkamp,et al.  Rapid SARS-CoV-2 whole-genome sequencing and analysis for informed public health decision-making in the Netherlands , 2020, Nature Medicine.

[10]  M. Suchard,et al.  The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 in Europe and the US , 2020, bioRxiv.

[11]  Richard A Neher,et al.  TreeTime: Maximum-likelihood phylodynamic analysis , 2017, bioRxiv.

[12]  N. Pearce,et al.  Temporal trends , 2005 .