Structural integrity assessment of components subjected to low constraint conditions

Abstract Fracture assessment of a structural component by different procedures utilises fracture toughness data derived from deeply cracked fracture mechanics test pieces. These represent a high level of constraint that may result in excessive conservatism and possible unnecessary replacement or rejection of structural components which are actually fit for service. A source of the conservatism is that the triaxiality of the stress field in the vicinity of a shallow crack in a structural component can be lower than that in a deeply cracked test specimen. Consequently, the apparent fracture toughness of the material and the load bearing capacity of the structural component are increased. Such a situation is usually referred to as “loss of constraint”. In addition, stress fields with low triaxiality occur near non-sharp defects. The ability to allow for the loss of constraint is potentially of great practical significance. This paper provides a fracture assessment methodology which take into account in-plane loss of constraint. Traditionally, the different sources of constraint (type of loading, crack shallowness and notch effect) have been treated separately and no assessment tools had been proposed for the global treatment of the loss of constraint. It also gathers and analyses the results of the experimental programme performed in order to validate this methodology.

[1]  Guy Pluvinage,et al.  Effect of ferritic microstructure on local damage zone distance associated with fracture near notch , 1999 .

[2]  Kim Wallin,et al.  The size effect in KICresults , 1985 .

[3]  Robert A. Ainsworth,et al.  Assessment of the integrity of structures containing defects , 1987 .

[4]  Paul C. Paris,et al.  Elastic field equations for blunt cracks with reference to stress corrosion cracking , 1967 .

[5]  C. Shih,et al.  Family of crack-tip fields characterized by a triaxiality parameter—II. Fracture applications , 1992 .

[6]  John W. Hutchinson,et al.  Singular behaviour at the end of a tensile crack in a hardening material , 1968 .

[7]  Noel P. O’Dowd.  Applications of two parameter approaches in elastic-plastic fracture mechanics , 1995 .

[8]  S. González.  Evaluación de la integridad estructural de componentes sometidos a condiciones de bajo confinamiento , 2007 .

[9]  G. Pluvinage.  Fatigue and fracture emanating from notch; the use of the notch stress intensity factor , 1998 .

[10]  Z. Jin,et al.  SIZE EFFECTS AND A MEAN‐STRENGTH CRITERION FOR CERAMICS , 1993 .

[11]  Robert A. Ainsworth,et al.  The Treatment of Constraint Effects in Integrity Evaluations , 2005 .

[12]  Kim Wallin,et al.  Quantifying Tstress controlled constraint by the master curve transition temperature T0 , 2001 .

[13]  Hiroshi Miyamoto,et al.  The thickness effect of side grooved CT specimens , 1984 .

[14]  C. Shih,et al.  Family of crack-tip fields characterized by a triaxiality parameter—I. Structure of fields , 1991 .

[15]  J. Rice,et al.  Plane strain deformation near a crack tip in a power-law hardening material , 1967 .

[16]  Soon Il Moon,et al.  Evaluation of static and dynamic fracture toughness using apparent fracture toughness of notched specimen , 2004 .

[17]  F. M. Burdekin,et al.  Engineering critical analyses to BS 7910 — the UK guide on methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures , 2000 .

[18]  Guy Pluvinage,et al.  Stress field near a large blunted tip V-notch and application of the concept of the critical notch stress intensity factor (NSIF) to the fracture toughness of very brittle materials , 1994 .

[19]  A. Pineau,et al.  A local criterion for cleavage fracture of a nuclear pressure vessel steel , 1983 .

[20]  David Taylor,et al.  The fracture mechanics of finite crack extension , 2005 .

[21]  J. Hancock,et al.  Two-Parameter Characterization of Elastic-Plastic Crack-Tip Fields , 1991 .

[22]  Fumiyoshi Minami,et al.  A probabilistic analysis on thickness effect in fracture toughness , 1987 .

[23]  A. A. Griffith.  The Phenomena of Rupture and Flow in Solids , 1921 .

[24]  Fumiyoshi Minami,et al.  Method of constraint loss correction of CTOD fracture toughness for fracture assessment of steel components , 2006 .

[25]  Andrew H. Sherry,et al.  COMPENDIUM OF T‐STRESS SOLUTIONS FOR TWO AND THREE DIMENSIONAL CRACKED GEOMETRIES , 1995 .

[26]  Wang Fenghui,et al.  Prediction of intrinsic fracture toughness for brittle materials from the apparent toughness of notched-crack specimen , 2000 .