Comparison of navigated and non-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor cortex mapping, motor threshold and motor evoked potentials

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used for non-invasive assessment of cortical physiology and descending motor pathways. However, the focus/exact site of cortical activation is considerably widespread in traditional TMS. When combined with MRI-based navigation, it allows specific anatomical areas of the cortex to be stimulated. The peripheral muscle responses to TMS are commonly measured as motor evoked potentials (MEPs). We compared the accuracy of cortical mapping, as well as the congruity of the motor thresholds (MT) and MEPs between navigated and non-navigated TMS procedures. Eight volunteers were studied in two sessions. In each session both hemispheres were stimulated with and without navigation. Non-navigated TMS: Both hemispheres were mapped without navigation to find the representation area of the thenar muscles based on induced MEP amplitudes. MT was then determined at the optimum coil location. Navigated TMS: Individual MR-images were used for the on-line navigation procedure. The cortical representation area of the thenar musculature was mapped at the "hand knob". The optimum stimulus target was used for MT determination. The order of these two procedures was randomized. Following the MT determination, MEPs were recorded from 20 consecutive stimuli. The MTs were similar from session-to-session with no inter-hemispheric differences, and with and without navigation. The stimulus location was more spatially discrete in navigated TMS producing more stable MEPs with significantly higher amplitudes and shorter latencies. In summary, MEPs exhibit significant differences depending on whether navigation is used. However, the MTs are not significantly dependent on the discrete stimulation site.

[1]  S. C. Gandevia,et al.  Effect of contraction strength on responses in biceps brachii and adductor pollicis to transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  P J Delwaide,et al.  Ipsilateral Motor Responses to Focal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Healthy Subjects and Acute-Stroke Patients , 2001, Stroke.

[3]  M. Crawford,et al.  Variability of Motor-Evoked Potentials Recorded During Nitrous Oxide Anesthesia from the Tibialis Anterior Muscle After Transcranial Electrical Stimulation , 1996, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[4]  P. Rossini,et al.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  J. Lorberbaum,et al.  How coil-cortex distance relates to age, motor threshold, and antidepressant response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2000, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[6]  K. Mills,et al.  Corticomotor threshold to magnetic stimulation: Normal values and repeatability , 1997, Muscle & nerve.

[7]  Benoit M. Macq,et al.  Registration and real-time visualization of transcranial magnetic stimulation with 3-D MR images , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Cornelius Weiller,et al.  Motor Strokes: The Lesion Location Determines Motor Excitability Changes , 2005, Stroke.

[9]  Markus Weber,et al.  Magnetic stimulation of the central and peripheral nervous systems , 2002, Muscle & nerve.

[10]  Antti Korvenoja,et al.  Somatotopic blocking of sensation with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary somatosensory cortex , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[11]  Tracy R. Henderson,et al.  Simple metric for scaling motor threshold based on scalp-cortex distance: application to studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  F. Awiszus TMS and threshold hunting. , 2003, Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  A. Conforto,et al.  Impact of coil position and electrophysiological monitoring on determination of motor thresholds to transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  P M Rossini,et al.  Interhemispheric asymmetries in the perception of unimanual and bimanual cutaneous stimuli. A study using transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  M G Leggio,et al.  Excitability of the motor cortex to magnetic stimulation in patients with cerebellar lesions. , 1994, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[16]  G. Abbruzzese,et al.  Motor recovery following stroke: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation coregistered with MRI: a comparison of a guided versus blind stimulation technique and its effect on evoked compound muscle action potentials , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  Daniela Balslev,et al.  Inter-individual variability in optimal current direction for transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[19]  K. Chiappa,et al.  Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  S. Boniface,et al.  Magnetic brain stimulation with a double coil: the importance of coil orientation. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  Petro Julkunen,et al.  Effect of electrode cap on measured cortical motor threshold , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[22]  A Thron,et al.  Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Presurgical Planning , 2001 .

[23]  J Arpa,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with cerebellar stroke. , 1997, European neurology.

[24]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Localization of the motor hand area to a knob on the precentral gyrus. A new landmark. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  R N Lemon,et al.  Contralateral and ipsilateral EMG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation during recovery of arm and hand function after stroke. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[26]  E. Wassermann Variation in the response to transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in the general population , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[27]  M. Magistris,et al.  Trial-to-trial size variability of motor-evoked potentials. A study using the triple stimulation technique , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  Paolo Maria Rossini,et al.  Imagery-induced cortical excitability changes in stroke: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  Robert Chen,et al.  The clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation: Report of an IFCN committee , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[30]  Petro Julkunen,et al.  Factors influencing cortical silent period: Optimized stimulus location, intensity and muscle contraction , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[31]  J. Karhu,et al.  Efficient reduction of stimulus artefact in TMS–EEG by epithelial short-circuiting by mini-punctures , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[32]  A. Quartarone,et al.  Interhemispheric threshold differences in idiopathic generalized epilepsies with versive or circling seizures determined with focal magnetic transcranial stimulation , 2000, Epilepsy Research.

[33]  A. Barker,et al.  NON-INVASIVE MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX , 1985, The Lancet.

[34]  N. Davey,et al.  Variability in the amplitude of skeletal muscle responses to magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in man. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[35]  C. Ingersoll,et al.  INTRA-RATER RELIABILITY OF A TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION TECHNIQUE TO OBTAIN MOTOR EVOKED POTENTIALS , 2008, The International journal of neuroscience.

[36]  Lisa Koski,et al.  Normative data on changes in transcranial magnetic stimulation measures over a ten hour period , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[37]  Petro Julkunen,et al.  Navigated TMS combined with EEG in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: A pilot study , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[38]  Petro Julkunen,et al.  Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and computed electric field strength reduce stimulator-dependent differences in the motor threshold , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[39]  Uwe Herwig,et al.  Using the International 10-20 EEG System for Positioning of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2004, Brain Topography.

[40]  M G Leggio,et al.  Motor cortex changes in a patient with hemicerebellectomy. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[41]  Timothy S Miles,et al.  Magnetic stimulation of motor and somatosensory cortices suppresses perception of ulnar nerve stimuli. , 2003, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[42]  Esa Mervaala,et al.  Non-primary motor areas in the human frontal lobe are connected directly to hand muscles , 2008, NeuroImage.