Consumer Preferences for Rural Residences: A Conjoint Analysis in Ontario, Canada

Conjoint measurement is introduced as an appropriate method for characterising the nature of consumer preferences for various types of rural residence. After a review of the major conceptual and technical issues in conjoint analysis, a study involving twenty-two potential homebuyers in southern Ontario is described. The results indicate that potential buyers are seeking privacy (medium-size or large lots in isolated locations) above all other things, which translates into a behavioural push for sprawling, low-density development. Further examination of the utilities attached to the various attributes of potential residences suggests a limited but real opportunity for the use of controls on lot and house size and on municipal service provision to increase the attractivenss of high-density, village locations to consumers.

[1]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  A CONCEPTUAL AND ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING SPATIAL AND TRAVEL CHOICES , 1981 .

[2]  R. M. Johnson,et al.  Pairwise nonmetric multidimensional scaling , 1973 .

[3]  Madhav N. Segal,et al.  Reliability of Conjoint Analysis: Contrasting Data Collection Procedures , 1982 .

[4]  Harry Timmermans,et al.  Decompositional Multiattribute Preference Models in Spatial Choice Analysis: A Review of Some Recent Developments , 1984 .

[5]  A. Phipps Households' Utilities and Hedonic Prices for Inner-City Homes , 1987 .

[6]  Alan G. Phipps,et al.  INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN THE RESIDENTIAL PREFERENCES OF INNER-CITY HOMEOWNERS , 1985 .

[7]  Leo F. Schnore,et al.  The Separation of Home and Work: A Problem for Human Ecology , 1954 .

[8]  Richard M. Johnson Trade-Off Analysis of Consumer Values , 1974 .

[9]  H. Timmermans,et al.  Decisionmaking between Multiattribute Choice Alternatives: A Model of Spatial Shopping-Behaviour Using Conjoint Measurements , 1984 .

[10]  Douglas S. Bible,et al.  Place utility, attribute tradeoff, and choice behavior in an intra-urban migration context , 1981 .

[11]  Vithala R. Rao,et al.  Conjoint Measurement- for Quantifying Judgmental Data , 1971 .

[12]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Hybrid Models for Conjoint Analysis: An Expository Review , 1984 .

[13]  Hjp Harry Timmermans,et al.  Specification of Individual Residential Utility Functions: A Comparative Analysis of Three Measurement Procedures , 1984 .

[14]  A. Joseph,et al.  Rural residential development and municipal service provision: a Canadian case study , 1985 .

[15]  P. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook , 1978 .