Time series predictive models of piezoelectric active-sensing for SHM applications

In this paper, the use of time domain data from piezoelectric active-sensing techniques is investigated for structural health monitoring (SHM) applications. Piezoelectric transducers have been increasingly used in SHM because of their proven advantages. Especially, the use of known and repeatable inputs at high frequency ranges makes the development of SHM signal processing algorithm easier and more efficient. However, to date, most of these techniques have been based on frequency domain analyses, such as impedance-based or high-frequency response functions (FRF) -based SHM techniques. Even with Lamb wave propagations, most researchers adopt frequency domain or wavelets analysis for damage-sensitive feature extraction. This process usually requires excessive averaging to reduce measurement noise and more computational resources, which is not ideal from both memory and power consumption standpoints. Therefore in this study, we investigate the use of autoregressive models with exogenous inputs (ARX) with the measured time series data from piezoelectric active-sensors. The test structure considered in this study is a composite plate, where several damage conditions were manually imposed. The performance of this technique is compared to that of traditional autoregressive models, traditionally used in low-frequency passive sensing SHM applications, and that of FRF-based analysis, and its superior capability for SHM is demonstrated.

[1]  Jeong-Beom Ihn,et al.  Detection and monitoring of hidden fatigue crack growth using a built-in piezoelectric sensor/actuator network: II. Validation using riveted joints and repair patches , 2004 .

[2]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..

[3]  Victor Giurgiutiu,et al.  Piezoelectric Wafer Embedded Active Sensors for Aging Aircraft Structural Health Monitoring , 2002 .

[4]  Constantinos Soutis,et al.  Non-destructive inspection of sandwich and repaired composite laminated structures , 2005 .

[5]  Vicente Lopes Junior,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring in Smart Structures Through Time Series Analysis , 2008 .

[6]  Constantinos Soutis,et al.  Damage detection in composite materials using lamb wave methods , 2002 .

[7]  Grant P. Steven,et al.  VIBRATION-BASED MODEL-DEPENDENT DAMAGE (DELAMINATION) IDENTIFICATION AND HEALTH MONITORING FOR COMPOSITE STRUCTURES — A REVIEW , 2000 .

[8]  Jerome P. Lynch Design of a wireless active sensing unit for localized structural health monitoring , 2005 .

[9]  M. Lemistre,et al.  Structural health monitoring system based on diffracted Lamb wave analysis by multiresolution processing , 2001 .

[10]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Overview of Piezoelectric Impedance-Based Health Monitoring and Path Forward , 2003 .

[11]  Chung Bang Yun,et al.  Multiple Crack Detection of Concrete Structures Using Impedance-based Structural Health Monitoring Techniques , 2006 .

[12]  Keith Worden,et al.  DAMAGE DETECTION USING OUTLIER ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[13]  Andrei N Zagrai,et al.  Damage Identification in Aging Aircraft Structures with Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors , 2004 .

[14]  Suresh Bhalla,et al.  High frequency piezoelectric signatures for diagnosis of seismic/blast induced structural damages , 2004 .

[15]  Dale M. Pitt,et al.  Recent advances in active damage interrogation , 2001 .

[16]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Nonlinear System Identification for Damage Detection , 2007 .

[17]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  High-frequency response functions for composite plate monitoring with ultrasonic validation , 2005 .

[18]  E. H. Clayton,et al.  Damage state evaluation of experimental and simulated bolted joints using chaotic ultrasonic waves , 2009 .

[19]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  Review of guided-wave structural health monitoring , 2007 .

[20]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Applying the LANL Statistical Pattern Recognition Paradigm for Structural Health Monitoring to Data from a Surface-Effect Fast Patrol Boat , 2001 .

[21]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Structural health monitoring algorithm comparisons using standard data sets , 2009 .

[22]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  The fundamental axioms of structural health monitoring , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[23]  D. Mitchell Wilkes,et al.  Robust and accurate ARX and ARMA model order estimation of non-Gaussian processes , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..