Top-down attentional processing enhances auditory evoked gamma band activity
暂无分享,去创建一个
Daniel Gembris | Stefan Debener | Andreas K Engel | Christoph S Herrmann | Cornelia Kranczioch | A. Engel | S. Debener | C. Herrmann | C. Kranczioch | D. Gembris
[1] W. Singer,et al. Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[2] M. Fabiani,et al. Changes in brain activity patterns in aging: the novelty oddball. , 1995, Psychophysiology.
[3] Joachim Röschke,et al. Time course of human 40 Hz EEG activity accompanying P3 responses in an auditory oddball paradigm , 1997, Neuroscience Letters.
[4] Tamer Demiralp,et al. The phase‐locking of auditory gamma band responses in humans is sensitive to task processing , 1997, Neuroreport.
[5] K. Reinikainen,et al. Selective attention enhances the auditory 40-Hz transient response in humans , 1993, Nature.
[6] J. Pernier,et al. Stimulus Specificity of Phase-Locked and Non-Phase-Locked 40 Hz Visual Responses in Human , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[7] W Singer,et al. Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.
[8] D. Wilkin,et al. Neuron , 2001, Brain Research.
[9] R. Desimone,et al. The Role of Neural Mechanisms of Attention in Solving the Binding Problem , 1999, Neuron.
[10] W. Singer,et al. Stimulus-dependent synchronization of neuronal responses in the visual cortex of the awake macaque monkey , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.
[11] A. Labarga,et al. Gamma band activity in an auditory oddball paradigm studied with the wavelet transform , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[12] F. Rösler,et al. Stimulus-induced gamma oscillations: harmonics of alpha activity? , 1995, Neuroreport.
[13] A. Treisman. The binding problem , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[14] Axel Mecklinger,et al. Gamma activity in human EEG is related to highspeed memory comparisons during object selective attention , 2001 .
[15] D. Friedman,et al. The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.
[16] Matthias M. Müller,et al. Visually induced gamma-band responses in human electroencephalographic activity — a link to animal studies , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.
[17] A. Engel,et al. Auditory novelty oddball allows reliable distinction of top-down and bottom-up processes of attention. , 2002, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.
[18] M. Müller. Object processing in the infant brain. , 2001, Science.
[19] R. Desimone,et al. Modulation of Oscillatory Neuronal Synchronization by Selective Visual Attention , 2001, Science.
[20] W. Singer,et al. Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties , 1989, Nature.
[21] E. Basar,et al. Gamma-band responses in the brain: a short review of psychophysiological correlates and functional significance. , 1996, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.
[22] V. Samar,et al. Wavelet Analysis of Neuroelectric Waveforms: A Conceptual Tutorial , 1999, Brain and Language.
[23] R. Knight,et al. Mechanisms of human attention: event-related potentials and oscillations , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.
[24] C. Herrmann,et al. Gamma responses and ERPs in a visual classification task , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[25] M. Corbetta,et al. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.