Decoding Cities to Model, Assess and Redesign them as Complex Urban Systems

The complexity of cities presents a key challenge in being able to ‘decode‘ and subsequently measure or describe them. Adding to these challenges is the transdisciplinary nature of city design which largely accords to disciplinary silos. This research argues that successful city design can benefit from understanding cities as complex sociotechnical systems – considering the interaction between humans, technology and the environment. This paper provides a precis of a programme of research which utilised the results of an international survey to ‘decode’ and construct a systems model of a main street to help understand and appropriately respond to city complexity. The research uses subject matter expert knowledge and insights from 70 survey participants, across 5 continents, to model an archetype main street. The project describes and models hundreds of physical objects, priority measures and main street functions with linkages between these components. The model allows for the exploration and measurement of a range of both technical characteristics such as engineering standards, as well as the influence and outcomes of necessary subjective measures like, user experience. It was able to provide an insight about which characteristics are critical to the city system, how they are delivered and why they are important - from a transdisciplinary perspective. This paper also highlights the work done to identify the relationships between the physical objects of a main street. Further details of the research programme are highlighted in the conclusions, including how the archetype model was used to explore the performance of a main street case study, identify missing components and locate them with consideration of their optimal proximity to other related features. We argue that this innovative approach may provide a more structured and process driven exploration of city design.

[1]  Neelam Naikar Work Domain Analysis , 2013 .

[2]  Robert J. Lilieholm,et al.  Using Bayesian belief networks to identify potential compatibilities and conflicts between development and landscape conservation , 2011 .

[3]  M. Richards,et al.  A city is not a tree , 2017 .

[4]  Alan Geoffrey Wilson,et al.  Complex Spatial Systems , 2000 .

[5]  Michael Batty Complexity and emergence in city systems:implications for urban planning , 2009 .

[6]  Hirotaka Miura,et al.  SGL: Stata Graph Library for network analysis , 2011 .

[7]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Hierarchical task analysis vs. cognitive work analysis: comparison of theory, methodology and contribution to system design , 2010 .

[8]  Pascal Berruet,et al.  Designing sociotechnical systems: a CWA-based method for dynamic function allocation , 2015, ECCE.

[9]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  What is on your mind? Using the perceptual cycle model and critical decision method to understand the decision-making process in the cockpit , 2013, Ergonomics.

[10]  Edward M. Reingold,et al.  Graph drawing by force‐directed placement , 1991, Softw. Pract. Exp..

[11]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Agent-based computational models and generative social science , 1999, Complex..

[12]  K. Krizek Residential Relocation and Changes in Urban Travel: Does Neighborhood-Scale Urban Form Matter? , 2003 .

[13]  J. Jacobs The Death and Life of Great American Cities , 1962 .

[14]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  Urban Scaling and Its Deviations: Revealing the Structure of Wealth, Innovation and Crime across Cities , 2010, PloS one.

[15]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Measuring the Unmeasurable: Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability , 2009 .

[16]  J. Holland Complexity: A Very Short Introduction , 2014 .

[17]  Michael Batty,et al.  Progress, Success, and Failure in Urban Modelling , 1979 .

[18]  Merritt Polk,et al.  Institutional Capacity-building in Urban Planning and Policy-making for Sustainable Development: Success or Failure? , 2011 .

[19]  Paul M. Salmon,et al.  Cognitive work analysis and design: current practice and future practitioner requirements , 2015 .

[20]  Antony Radford,et al.  Urban design, ethics and responsive cohesion , 2010 .

[21]  Lukas Furst Cities And Complexity Understanding Cities With Cellular Automata Agent Based Models And Fractals , 2016 .

[22]  Demet Yesiltepe,et al.  Modeling walkability: the effects of street design, street-network configuration and land-use on pedestrian movement , 2015 .

[23]  Nicholas Stevens,et al.  Sociotechnical urbanism: new systems ergonomics perspectives on land use planning and urban design , 2016 .

[24]  Paul M. Salmon,et al.  A systems approach to city design: Exploring the compatibility of sociotechnical systems , 2017 .

[25]  Stefano Moroni,et al.  Complexity and the inherent limits of explanation and prediction: Urban codes for self-organising cities , 2015 .

[26]  Michael Batty,et al.  The Origins of Complexity Theory in Cities and Planning , 2012 .

[27]  Visualization of Social Networks in Stata by Multi-dimensional Scaling ∗ , 2010 .

[28]  Benedikt’s challenge: Reconstructing the whole from the parts , 2017 .

[29]  R. Cervero,et al.  TRAVEL DEMAND AND THE 3DS: DENSITY, DIVERSITY, AND DESIGN , 1997 .

[30]  John Abbott,et al.  Modeling Cities and Regions as Complex Systems: From Theory to Planning Applications , 2016 .

[31]  Paul M. Salmon,et al.  A sociotechnical systems approach to understand complex urban systems: A global transdisciplinary perspective , 2018 .

[32]  Cliff Ellis,et al.  Process and Principles in Urban Design , 2014 .

[33]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Social Network Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[34]  Romain Reuillon,et al.  Erratum to: Urban Dynamics and Simulation Models , 2017 .

[35]  J. Gehl,et al.  Close encounters with buildings , 2006 .

[36]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Following the cognitive work analysis train of thought: exploring the constraints of modal shift to rail transport , 2013, Ergonomics.

[37]  Roger White,et al.  Modeling Cities and Regions as Complex Systems: From Theory to Planning Applications , 2015 .

[38]  E. M. Boertjes,et al.  Visualization of Social Networks , 2011 .

[39]  Nicholas Stevens,et al.  Safe places for pedestrians: using cognitive work analysis to consider the relationships between the engineering and urban design of footpaths. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[40]  Denise Pumain,et al.  Multiagent Systems and the Dynamics of a Settlement System , 2010 .

[41]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Designing sociotechnical systems with cognitive work analysis: putting theory back into practice , 2015, Ergonomics.