Surrogate Model-Based Uncertainty Quantification for a Helical Gear Pair

Competitive industrial transmission systems must perform most efficiently with reference to complex requirements and conflicting key performance indicators. This design challenge translates into a high-dimensional multi-objective optimization problem that requires complex algorithms and evaluation of computationally expensive simulations to predict physical system behavior and design robustness. Crucial for the design decision-making process is the characterization, ranking, and quantification of relevant sources of uncertainties. However, due to the strict time limits of product development loops, the overall computational burden of uncertainty quantification (UQ) may even drive state-of-the-art parallel computing resources to their limits. Efficient machine learning (ML) tools and techniques emphasizing high-fidelity simulation data-driven training will play a fundamental role in enabling UQ in the early-stage development phase.This investigation surveys UQ methods with a focus on noise, vibration, and harshness (NVH) characteristics of transmission systems. Quasi-static 3D contact dynamic simulations are performed to evaluate the static transmission error (TE) of meshing gear pairs under different loading and boundary conditions. TE indicates NVH excitation and is typically used as an objective function in the early-stage design process. The limited system size allows large-scale design of experiments (DoE) and enables numerical studies of various UQ sampling and modeling techniques where the design parameters are treated as random variables associated with tolerances from manufacturing and assembly processes. The model accuracy of generalized polynomial chaos expansion (gPC) and Gaussian process regression (GPR) is evaluated and compared. The results of the methods are discussed to conclude efficient and scalable solution procedures for robust design optimization.

[1]  D. Krige A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand, by D.G. Krige, published in the Journal, December 1951 : introduction by the author , 1951 .

[2]  Dongbin Xiu,et al.  The Wiener-Askey Polynomial Chaos for Stochastic Differential Equations , 2002, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[3]  D. Xiu Efficient collocational approach for parametric uncertainty analysis , 2007 .

[4]  Christian Brecher,et al.  Function-oriented Tolerancing of Tooth Flank Modifications of Beveloid Gears , 2016 .

[5]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Nonlinear Mathematical Models. Numerical ExperienceSensitivity Analysis for Nonlinear Mathematical Models. Numerical Experience , 1995 .

[6]  B. Sudret,et al.  An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis , 2010 .

[7]  R. Ghanem,et al.  Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach , 1990 .

[8]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[9]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization , 2009 .

[10]  Houman Owhadi,et al.  Handbook of Uncertainty Quantification , 2017 .

[11]  Will Usher,et al.  SALib: An open-source Python library for Sensitivity Analysis , 2017, J. Open Source Softw..

[12]  Loic Le Gratiet,et al.  Metamodel-based sensitivity analysis: polynomial chaos expansions and Gaussian processes , 2016, 1606.04273.

[13]  D. Xiu Numerical Methods for Stochastic Computations: A Spectral Method Approach , 2010 .

[14]  Constantin Weber,et al.  Formänderung und Profilrücknahme : bei gerad- und schrägverzahnten Rädern , 1953 .

[15]  Charles Tong,et al.  Refinement strategies for stratified sampling methods , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 1998 .

[17]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[18]  Jean-Yves Dantan,et al.  Statistical tolerance analysis of bevel gear by tooth contact analysis and Monte Carlo simulation , 2007 .

[19]  Jeongeun Son,et al.  Comparison of intrusive and nonintrusive polynomial chaos expansion-based approaches for high dimensional parametric uncertainty quantification and propagation , 2020, Comput. Chem. Eng..