Historical data demand in window-based battery parameter identification algorithm

Abstract A window-based battery parameter identification method can directly apply the historical battery operating data to observe the battery parameters and running states. However, the design principles of a parameter identification window remain unclear. In this study, two factors that affect the performance of a battery parameter identification algorithm are considered: characteristics of the parameter identification window and action mechanism of the historical data. Our aim is to understand the effects of the historical data application methods on the algorithm performance, including three perspectives: (1) the effect of a slow dynamic fluctuation in the parameter identification window on the battery identification results, (2) the effect of the parameter identification window length on the identification results, and (3) the difference in demand for the fractional- and integer-order equivalent circuit model for the parameter identification window. The battery parameters and states are simultaneously identified based on the coevolutionary particle-swarm optimization algorithm. A comparison of the results shows that the combination of a fractional-order equivalent circuit model and a linear approximation method can achieve more stable and consistent identification results. In addition, a linear approximation method has an advantage in terms of ensuring stationarity of the identification results.

[1]  Baojin Wang,et al.  State-space model with non-integer order derivatives for lithium-ion battery , 2016 .

[2]  Bor Yann Liaw,et al.  On state-of-charge determination for lithium-ion batteries , 2017 .

[3]  Jun Xu,et al.  A new method to estimate the state of charge of lithium-ion batteries based on the battery impedance model , 2013 .

[4]  Jianqiu Li,et al.  Investigating the error sources of the online state of charge estimation methods for lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles , 2018 .

[5]  Zonghai Chen,et al.  A novel method for lithium-ion battery state of energy and state of power estimation based on multi-time-scale filter , 2018 .

[6]  Unai Viscarret,et al.  Enhanced closed loop State of Charge estimator for lithium-ion batteries based on Extended Kalman Filter , 2015 .

[7]  D. H. Zhang,et al.  Research on Parameter Identification of Battery Model Based on Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm , 2015 .

[8]  D. Sierociuk,et al.  Fractional Kalman filter algorithm for the states, parameters and order of fractional system estimation , 2006 .

[9]  Zafer Sahinoglu,et al.  Battery State-of-Charge Estimation Based on Regular/Recurrent Gaussian Process Regression , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[10]  Min Chen,et al.  Accurate electrical battery model capable of predicting runtime and I-V performance , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[11]  Chengliang Yin,et al.  A transfer function type of simplified electrochemical model with modified boundary conditions and Padé approximation for Li-ion battery: Part 1. lithium concentration estimation , 2017 .

[12]  Tao Sun,et al.  A comparative study of different equivalent circuit models for estimating state-of-charge of lithium-ion batteries , 2018 .

[13]  A. Izadian,et al.  Electrochemical model parameter identification of a lithium-ion battery using particle swarm optimization method , 2016 .

[14]  Zonghai Chen,et al.  A novel approach of battery pack state of health estimation using artificial intelligence optimization algorithm , 2018 .

[15]  Hongyu Li,et al.  Model Parameter Identification for Lithium Batteries Using the Coevolutionary Particle Swarm Optimization Method , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[16]  Shi Li,et al.  A comparative study of model-based capacity estimation algorithms in dual estimation frameworks for lithium-ion batteries under an accelerated aging test , 2018 .

[17]  Zonghai Chen,et al.  An online method for lithium-ion battery remaining useful life estimation using importance sampling and neural networks , 2016 .

[18]  Torsten Wik,et al.  Robust recursive impedance estimation for automotive lithium-ion batteries , 2016 .

[19]  Qiang Ling,et al.  Power capability evaluation for lithium iron phosphate batteries based on multi-parameter constraints estimation , 2018 .

[20]  James Marco,et al.  Online estimation of battery equivalent circuit model parameters and state of charge using decoupled least squares technique , 2018 .

[21]  Jinlong Zhang,et al.  State of charge estimation of LiFePO4 batteries based on online parameter identification , 2016 .

[22]  Rui Xiong,et al.  A novel fractional order model based state-of-charge estimation method for lithium-ion battery , 2017 .

[23]  Bin Li,et al.  State-of-charge Estimation for Lithium-ion Battery using a Combined Method , 2018 .

[24]  David G. Dorrell,et al.  Fractional-order modeling and State-of-Charge estimation for ultracapacitors , 2016 .

[25]  Thierry Poinot,et al.  Initialization of a fractional order identification algorithm applied for Lithium-ion battery modeling in time domain , 2018, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul..

[26]  Hao Mu,et al.  A systematic model-based degradation behavior recognition and health monitoring method for lithium-ion batteries , 2017 .

[27]  Guangzhong Dong,et al.  System state estimation and optimal energy control framework for multicell lithium-ion battery system , 2017 .

[28]  Xiang Cheng,et al.  SOC Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries With AEKF and Wavelet Transform Matrix , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[29]  S. Lux,et al.  Impedance change and capacity fade of lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide-based batteries during calendar aging , 2017 .

[30]  Joeri Van Mierlo,et al.  A quick on-line state of health estimation method for Li-ion battery with incremental capacity curves processed by Gaussian filter , 2018 .