Anatomical and physiological classification of hepatic vein dominance applied to liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND Proper outflow reconstruction is essential in LDLT. Preoperative planning requires meticulous attention to hepatic vein dominance patterns. The purpose of our study was to provide a combined anatomical-physiological classification of hepatic vein dominance useful for surgical decision-making in both donors and recipients. METHODOLOGY We analyzed 3-dimensional CT-imaging reconstructions of 55 potential live liver donors evaluated at our Institution between January 2003 and May 2004. RESULTS Our data revealed that: 1) The middle hepatic vein (MHV) and left hepatic vein (LHV) show a relative lack of anatomical diversity, whereas the right hepatic vein (RHV) exhibits multiple variants, 2) 45% donors had inferior hepatic veins (IHV) with anatomically and physiologically relevant venous drainage territories, 3) The RHV is usually dominant when present as a single vein without anatomical IHV (type 1A), or when considered as a complex with IHV (type 1Bx) (80% vs. 88%), 4) Only 55% of dominant type 1Bx RHV/IHV-complex automatically included a dominant type 1By RHV by itself, 5) A single RHV out of anatomical complex with IHV (type 1By) was dominant in only 48% of our donor candidates, 6) The MHV types 2A and 2By are strongly dominant accounting for up to 57% of total liver volume (TLV). CONCLUSIONS We propose a new classification based on both anatomical and physiological hepatic venous configurations. Our model also provides a new nomenclature that can be universally applied to preoperative planning in LDLT.