Morphometry of Proximal Femur in Indian Population.

INTRODUCTION Total hip arthroplasty is a commonly performed surgery now-a-day. There are regional and racial variations in the stature of the population worldwide. So there is always need of population specific data for making best fit prosthesis. AIM The present study was done to measure the parameters of proximal femur and to analyse their correlation by using standard statistical analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ninety one dry bones (44 left and 47 right) were used. Femur Head Diameter (FHD), Femur Neck Length (FNL), Femur Neck Diameter (FND), Femur Neck Thickness (FNT), Cervicodiaphyseal Angle (CDA) was directly measured with the help of anthropometric instruments. Femur Head Offset (FHO) and Vertical Offset (VO) were measured in the anteroposterior digital photographs. RESULTS Normally distributed variables were compared using Student's t-test (Unpaired data) to analyse significant effect. There was a significant difference between right and left side of FND and CDA. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to analyse the relationship among variables. FHO had high correlation with the VO (0.687, p<0.001). CONCLUSION These parameters can be used for designing the prosthesis and plates for hip joint reconstructive surgeries suitable for Indian population.

[1]  A. Mukherjee,et al.  Correlation between neck shaft angle of femur with age and anthro-pometry: A radiographic study , 2016 .

[2]  B. D. R. Oliveira,et al.  Proximal Femoral Epiphysis: Manual Morphometry versus Digital Morphometry , 2015 .

[3]  Ho-Jung Cho,et al.  Morphometric Evaluation of Korean Femurs by Geometric Computation: Comparisons of the Sex and the Population , 2015, BioMed research international.

[4]  Kang-Ping Lin,et al.  Proximal Femoral Morphology and the Relevance to Design of Anatomically Precontoured Plates: A Study of the Chinese Population , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[5]  R. Kundu,et al.  Evaluation of proximal femoral geometry in plain anterior-posterior radiograph in eastern-Indian population. , 2014, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.

[6]  Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir,et al.  Three dimensional morphometry of the femur to design the total hip arthroplasty for Malay population , 2013 .

[7]  H. Naushaba,et al.  Morphometrical and Topographical Anatomy of Position of Nutrient Foramen on Fully Ossified Left Femur , 2013 .

[8]  L. Dahners,et al.  Anteroposterior Thickening of the Femoral Neck With Aging Decreases the “Offset” in Men , 2012, The American journal of sports medicine.

[9]  D. Cooperman,et al.  Evaluation of proximal femoral geometry using digital photographs , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[10]  M. R. Rodrigues,et al.  Morphometric Study of the Proximal Femur Extremity in Brazilians , 2010 .

[11]  A. Devine,et al.  Geometric Indices of Bone Strength Are Associated With Physical Activity and Dietary Calcium Intake in Healthy Older Women , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[12]  R. Nanda,et al.  Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability? , 2007, Injury.

[13]  J. Pasco,et al.  Femoral neck geometry and hip fracture risk: the Geelong osteoporosis study , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[14]  H. Çalış,et al.  Comparison of femoral geometry among cases with and without hip fractures. , 2004, Yonsei medical journal.

[15]  R. Siwach,et al.  Anthropometric Study of Proximal Femur Geometry and Its Clinical Application , 2003, Annals of the National Academy of Medical Sciences (India).

[16]  Banchong Mahaisavariya,et al.  Morphological study of the proximal femur: a new method of geometrical assessment using 3-dimensional reverse engineering. , 2002, Medical engineering & physics.

[17]  N S Laud,et al.  Anthropometric measurements to design total knee prostheses for the Indian population. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[18]  P. Leyvraz,et al.  Three-dimensional morphology of the proximal femur. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[19]  T. R. Deshmukh,et al.  Prediction of Femur Bone Geometry using Anthropometric Data of Indian Population: A Numerical Approach , 2010 .

[20]  Demichelis,et al.  Evaluation of the , 1992, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[21]  P. Leyvraz,et al.  The morphology of the proximal femur. A three-dimensional radiographic analysis. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[22]  Date of Acceptance , 2022 .