Understanding conditions for which biological effects of nonionizing electromagnetic fields can be expected.

Scientific interest in the interaction of nonionizing electromagnetic fields with biological systems is longstanding, but often still controversial. Theories, models and computer simulations have usually emphasized physical interactions with subsystems (e.g. cell membranes) of a biological system. By extending this first necessary physical step to a second step of explicitly and quantitatively considering chemical changes, increased understanding appears possible. In the case of "strong fields", the role of field-altered chemistry is important to electrochemotherapy [Biochem. Pharmacol. 42, Suppl. (1991) 567] and creation of transdermal microconduits [Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 49 (1999) 11; J. Controlled Release 61 (1999) 185; J. Invest. Dermatol. 116 (2001) 40] For "weak fields" (a topic with much more controversy) consideration of chemical change shows that organized multicellular systems can be understood to respond to extremely small electric [Chaos 8 (1998) 576] or magnetic fields [Nature 405 (2000) 707]. In contrast, isolated individual cells interacting via voltage-gated channels [Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 92 (1995) 3740; Biophys. J. 75 (1998) 2251; Bioelectromagnetics 20 (1999) 102], or processes without "temperature compensation" [Biophys. J. 76 (1999) 3026], appear implausible. Satisfactory understanding is likely only if experimental and theoretical work is reconciled, which should therefore be emphasized. The interaction of electromagnetic fields with biological systems is of interest because of fundamental scientific curiosity, potential medical benefits and possible human health hazards.

[1]  K. Foster,et al.  Dielectric properties of tissues and biological materials: a critical review. , 1989, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[2]  M. Rols,et al.  Introduction of specific carbohydrates into Eucalyptus gunnii cells increases their freezing tolerance. , 1995, European journal of biochemistry.

[3]  J. Weaver,et al.  Spatially constrained skin electroporation with sodium thiosulfate and urea creates transdermal microconduits. , 1999, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[4]  J. A. Gimm,et al.  Quantitative study of molecular transport due to electroporation: uptake of bovine serum albumin by erythrocyte ghosts. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[5]  A. Kalmijn,et al.  Electro-perception in Sharks and Rays , 1966, Nature.

[6]  J. Weaver,et al.  Microfabrication of individual 200 microm diameter transdermal microconduits using high voltage pulsing in salicylic acid and benzoic acid. , 2001, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[7]  H. Pauly,et al.  Über die Impedanz einer Suspension von kugelförmigen Teilchen mit einer Schale , 1959 .

[8]  J. Weaver,et al.  Observation of extremely heterogeneous electroporative molecular uptake by Saccharomyces cerevisiae which changes with electric field pulse amplitude. , 1995, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[9]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[10]  G. T. Martin,et al.  Biological effects due to weak electric and magnetic fields: the temperature variation threshold. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[11]  R. Astumian,et al.  Theoretical limits on the threshold for the response of long cells to weak extremely low frequency electric fields due to ionic and molecular flux rectification. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[12]  J. Weaver,et al.  A quantitative study of electroporation showing a plateau in net molecular transport. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[13]  R. Astumian,et al.  Rectification and signal averaging of weak electric fields by biological cells. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  D. Chang,et al.  Guide to Electroporation and Electrofusion , 1991 .

[15]  Yong Huang,et al.  Microfabricated electroporation chip for single cell membrane permeabilization , 2001 .

[16]  J. Weaver,et al.  Electroporation of mammalian skin: a mechanism to enhance transdermal drug delivery. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  K. Schulten,et al.  A model for photoreceptor-based magnetoreception in birds. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[18]  J. Weaver,et al.  Simultaneous quantitative determination of electroporative molecular uptake and subsequent cell survival using gel microdrops and flow cytometry. , 2000, Cytometry.

[19]  J. Weaver,et al.  Molecular change due to biomagnetic stimulation and transient magnetic fields: mechanical interference constraints on possible effects by cell membrane pore creation via magnetic particles , 1998 .

[20]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  Magnetic Field Effects in Chemistry and Biology , 1982 .

[21]  K. McLeod,et al.  Frequency dependence of electric field modulation of fibroblast protein synthesis. , 1987, Science.

[22]  J. Weaver,et al.  Creation of transdermal pathways for macromolecule transport by skin electroporation and a low toxicity, pathway-enlarging molecule. , 1999, Bioelectrochemistry and bioenergetics.

[23]  James C. Weaver,et al.  Detection of weak electric fields by sharks, rays, and skates. , 1998, Chaos.

[24]  J. Weaver,et al.  The number of molecules taken up by electroporated cells: quantitative determination , 1989, FEBS letters.

[25]  Kenneth J. Lohmann,et al.  Detection of magnetic field intensity by sea turtles , 1996, Nature.

[26]  James C. Weaver,et al.  7 – Progress toward a Theoretical Model for Electroporation Mechanism: Membrane Electrical Behavior and Molecular Transport , 1991 .

[27]  R. Astumian,et al.  The response of living cells to very weak electric fields: the thermal noise limit. , 1990, Science.

[28]  R. Lee,et al.  Significance of cell size and tissue structure in electrical trauma. , 1988, Journal of theoretical biology.

[29]  Charles Polk,et al.  CRC Handbook of Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields , 1986 .

[30]  Richard Heller,et al.  Electrochemotherapy, electrogenetherapy, and transdermal drug delivery : electrically mediated delivery of molecules to cells , 2000 .

[31]  James C. Weaver,et al.  Electroporation of cells and tissues , 2000 .

[32]  R. Astumian,et al.  Biological sensing of small field differences by magnetically sensitive chemical reactions , 2000, Nature.

[33]  Dr. Roswitha Wiltschko,et al.  Magnetic Orientation in Animals , 1995, Zoophysiology.

[34]  P. Gailey Membrane potential and time requirements for detection of weak signals by voltage-gated ion channels. , 1999, Bioelectromagnetics.

[35]  E Neumann,et al.  Mechanism of electroporative dye uptake by mouse B cells. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[36]  L. Mir,et al.  Very high cytotoxicity of bleomycin introduced into the cytosol of cells in culture. , 1991, Biochemical pharmacology.

[37]  Boris Rubinsky,et al.  Micro-Electroporation: Improving the Efficiency and Understanding of Electrical Permeabilization of Cells , 1999 .

[38]  David W. P. Thomas,et al.  Cell biology: Non-thermal heat-shock response to microwaves , 2000, Nature.