The Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammography and Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Male Breast Disease: A New Algorithm

Background: The purpose of this study was to define the diagnostic accuracy of mammography and ultrasound in the evaluation of male breast disease, and to suggest a diagnostic protocol for male breast disease. Material and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical, radiographic, and pathologic records of 75 patients. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4–5 mammograms and ultrasonograms were suggested as suspicious for malignancy. Results: Of the 75 patients, 23 (31%) were considered to have suspicious lesions by mammography and/or ultrasonography. 13 of the patients were shown to have breast cancer. The remaining 52 (69%) were referred for biopsy by clinicians; all of the biopsy specimens were benign (gynecomastia). The accuracy data of mammography and ultrasonography are: sensitivity, 69 and 100%; specificity, 87 and 97%; positive predictive value, 53 and 87%; negative predictive value, 93 and 100%; and accuracy, 84 and 97%, respectively. Conclusion: We suggest a new diagnostic algorithm for the evaluation of male breast disease in which ultrasonography may be used to evaluate palpable abnormalities as the first diagnostic tool of choice. To use and to trust imaging would decrease the number of falsepositive biopsies that would be generated by physical examination alone.

[1]  Sandra J Shin,et al.  Bilateral presentation of fibroadenoma with digital fibroma-like inclusions in the male breast. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[2]  T. Stephens,et al.  Primary breast cancer in men: clinical, imaging, and pathologic findings in 57 patients. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  E. Perez,et al.  The role of mammography in male patients with breast symptoms. , 2007, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[4]  M. Helvie,et al.  Outcome of Men Presenting with Clinical Breast Problems: The Role of Mammography and Ultrasound , 2006, The breast journal.

[5]  G. Layer,et al.  How should gynaecomastia be managed? , 2003, ANZ journal of surgery.

[6]  A. D. De Schepper,et al.  MAMMOGRAPHIC APPEARANCES OF MALE BREAST DISEASE , 2003, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[7]  I. Günhan-Bilgen,et al.  Male breast disease: clinical, mammographic, and ultrasonographic features. , 2002, European journal of radiology.

[8]  Samson Munn When should men undergo mammography? , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  T. Anthony,et al.  The diagnostic accuracy of mammography in the evaluation of male breast disease. , 2001, American journal of surgery.

[10]  G. Whitman,et al.  Sonographic features of primary breast cancer in men. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  G. F. Evans,et al.  Mammographic appearances of male breast disease. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[12]  F. Tavassoli,et al.  Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in the male breast , 1998, Cancer.

[13]  L. Bassett,et al.  Mammography of the male breast. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  L. Liberman,et al.  Mammographic findings in men with breast cancer. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  F. Nuttall,et al.  Gynecomastia as a physical finding in normal men. , 1979, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.