Image gently: using exposure indicators to improve pediatric digital radiography.

Digital radiography has become the norm in U.S. hospitals. The ability to view images, postprocess, and transmit the images systemwide immediately are distinct advantages. Yet, these technical advances create challenges for the radiology community, including the need to re-educate the workforce and prevent unnecessary radiation exposure. This education process is even more important for those who image children, where maintaining diagnostic image quality at a properly managed dose is critical. Because children are more sensitive than adults to the potential effects of ionizing radiation, particular attention to technique and its relationship to patient dose is important. This article emphasizes the need for attention to the basics of radiography and the importance of a standard approach in pediatric digital radiography. The purpose of this article is to:  Review the basics of radiography.  Explain the differences between film-screen radiography and digital radiography.  Discuss the meaning of the exposure indicators in digital radiography.  Introduce the new International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) exposure terminology standard.  Expound on the applicability of the new IEC terminology in quality assurance.

[1]  P C Brennan,et al.  Are exposure index values consistent in clinical practice? A multi-manufacturer investigation. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[2]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  An exposure indicator for digital radiography: AAPM Task Group 116 (executive summary). , 2009, Medical physics.

[3]  Magnus Båth,et al.  Automated detection of changes in patient exposure in digital projection radiography using exposure index from DICOM header metadata , 2011, Acta oncologica.

[4]  Laurie L. Fajardo,et al.  Clinical assessment of phosphor-plate computed radiography: Equipment, strategy, and methods , 1989, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[5]  Richard L. Morin,et al.  The standardized exposure index for digital radiography: an opportunity for optimization of radiation dose to the pediatric population , 2011, Pediatric Radiology.

[6]  C. E. Willis,et al.  The ALARA concept in pediatric CR and DR: dose reduction in pediatric radiographic exams – A white paper conference Executive Summary , 2004, Pediatric Radiology.

[7]  Elizabeth A Krupinski,et al.  Digital radiography image quality: image acquisition. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[8]  H. Warren-Forward,et al.  An assessment of exposure indices in computed radiography for the posterior-anterior chest and the lateral lumbar spine. , 2007, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  Mervyn D. Cohen,et al.  Quality assurance: using the exposure index and the deviation index to monitor radiation exposure for portable chest radiographs in neonates , 2011, Pediatric Radiology.

[10]  S. Vastagh Statement by MITA on behalf of the MITA CR-DR group of the X-ray section , 2011, Pediatric Radiology.

[11]  B. Whiting,et al.  Image Gently pediatric digital radiography summit: executive summary , 2011, Pediatric Radiology.

[12]  T. Slovis,et al.  The ALARA Concept in Pediatric CR and DR: Dose Reduction in Pediatric Radiographic Exams—a White Paper Conference Executive Summary , 2005 .

[13]  R. Markowitz,et al.  Quality assurance: a comparison study of radiographic exposure for neonatal chest radiographs at 4 academic hospitals , 2012, Pediatric Radiology.

[14]  M. Goske,et al.  Image Gently: Challenges for radiologic technologists when performing digital radiography in children , 2011, Pediatric Radiology.

[15]  S. Don Pediatric digital radiography summit overview: state of confusion , 2011, Pediatric Radiology.

[16]  R. Davidson,et al.  Exposure creep in computed radiography: a longitudinal study. , 2012, Academic radiology.

[17]  Steven Don,et al.  Radiosensitivity of children: potential for overexposure in CR and DR and magnitude of doses in ordinary radiographic examinations , 2004, Pediatric Radiology.

[18]  Julie Gill,et al.  Best practices in digital radiography. , 2012, Radiologic technology.

[19]  Kevin O'Donnell Radiation exposure monitoring: a new IHE profile , 2011, Pediatric Radiology.

[20]  Patrick C. Brennan,et al.  Digital radiography: are the manufacturers' settings too high? Optimisation of the Kodak digital radiography system with aid of the computed radiography dose index , 2002, European Radiology.

[21]  D. Waaler,et al.  Image rejects/retakes--radiographic challenges. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.