Challenge to promote change: both young and older adults benefit from contextual interference

Current society has to deal with major challenges related to our constantly increasing population of older adults. Since, motor performance generally deteriorates at older age, research investigating the effects of different types of training on motor improvement is particularly important. Here, we tested the effects of contextual interference (CI) while learning a bimanual coordination task in both young and older subjects. Both age groups acquired a low and high complexity task variant following either a blocked or random practice schedule. Typical CI effects, i.e., better overall performance during acquisition but detrimental effects during retention for the blocked compared with the random groups, were found for the low complexity task variant in both age groups. With respect to the high complexity task variant, no retention differences between both practice schedules were found. However, following random practice, better skill persistence (i.e., from end of acquisition to retention) over a 1 week time interval was observed for both task complexity variants and in both age groups. The current study provides clear evidence that the effects of different practice schedules on learning a complex bimanual task are not modulated by age.

[1]  Dana Maslovat,et al.  Contextual interference: single task versus multi-task learning. , 2004, Motor control.

[2]  R. Bjork Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. , 1994 .

[3]  G E Stelmach,et al.  Age-related deterioration of coordinated interlimb behavior. , 2000, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[4]  W. Spirduso,et al.  Age and Practice Effects on Force Control of the Thumb and Index Fingers in Precision Pinching and Bilateral Coordination , 1993 .

[5]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. , 1990 .

[6]  R. Magill,et al.  A REVIEW OF THE CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE EFFECT IN MOTOR SKILL ACQUISITION , 1990 .

[7]  Tal Jarus,et al.  Effects of Cognitive Processes and Task Complexity on Acquisition, Retention, and Transfer of Motor Skills , 2001 .

[8]  Claudia Voelcker-Rehage,et al.  Motor-skill learning in older adults—a review of studies on age-related differences , 2008, European Review of Aging and Physical Activity.

[9]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Iseult A. M. Beets,et al.  Contextual Interference in Complex Bimanual Skill Learning Leads to Better Skill Persistence , 2014, PloS one.

[11]  Joseph T. Gwin,et al.  Motor control and aging: Links to age-related brain structural, functional, and biochemical effects , 2010, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[12]  J. Shea,et al.  Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. , 1979 .

[13]  A. Vandervoort,et al.  The Influence of Aging on Motor Skill Learning , 1993 .

[14]  R. Magill Motor learning and control : concepts and applications , 2004 .

[15]  T D Lee,et al.  Contextual interference in learning new patterns of bimanual coordination. , 1998, Journal of motor behavior.

[16]  H. Hermens,et al.  Effects of Age and Content of Augmented Feedback on Learning an Isometric Force-Production Task , 2007, Experimental Aging Research.

[17]  Charles H. Shea,et al.  The learning of 90° continuous relative phase with and without Lissajous feedback: external and internally generated bimanual coordination. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[18]  B. Thon,et al.  Differential effects of task complexity on contextual interference in a drawing task. , 1998, Acta psychologica.

[19]  Fergus I. M. Craik,et al.  The Flexibility of Human Memory , 2014 .

[20]  M. Anshel,et al.  Effect of Aging on Acquisition and Short-Term Retention of a Motor Skill , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[21]  Stephan P. Swinnen,et al.  Testing Multiple Coordination Constraints with a Novel Bimanual Visuomotor Task , 2011, PloS one.

[22]  T. Jarus,et al.  Effects of Cognitive Processes and Task Complexity on Acquisition, Retention, and Transfer of Motor Skills , 2001, Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie.

[23]  B. Knowlton,et al.  Contextual interference effects in sequence learning for young and older adults. , 2010, Psychology and aging.

[24]  Charles H. Shea,et al.  Contextual interference: Contributions of practice , 1990 .

[25]  Stephan P. Swinnen,et al.  Bimanual motor deficits in older adults predicted by diffusion tensor imaging metrics of corpus callosum subregions , 2013, Brain Structure and Function.

[26]  M. Solmon,et al.  Practice schedule effects on the performance and learning of low- and high-skilled students: an applied study. , 1996, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[27]  F. Brady A Theoretical and Empirical Review of the Contextual Interference Effect and the Learning of Motor Skills , 1998 .

[28]  C. Wrisberg,et al.  The effect of contextual variety on the practice, retention, and transfer of an applied motor skill. , 1991, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[29]  Ming-Chang Chiang,et al.  Age related differences in the neural substrates of motor sequence learning after interleaved and repetitive practice , 2012, NeuroImage.

[30]  C. Shea,et al.  Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  P J Smith,et al.  Applying contextual interference to the Pawlata roll. , 1995, Journal of sports sciences.

[32]  A. Vandervoort,et al.  The influence of summary knowledge of results and aging on motor learning. , 1996, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[33]  M. Guadagnoli,et al.  Challenge Point: A Framework for Conceptualizing the Effects of Various Practice Conditions in Motor Learning , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[34]  Charles H Shea,et al.  Age-related effects in sequential motor learning. , 2006, Physical therapy.

[35]  C. Winstein,et al.  Learning–performance distinction and memory processes for motor skills: A focused review and perspective , 2012, Behavioural Brain Research.

[36]  Dana Maslovat,et al.  Contextual interference: single task versus multi-task learning. , 2004 .

[37]  Stephan P Swinnen,et al.  AGE-RELATED DEFICITS IN MOTOR LEARNING AND DIFFERENCES IN FEEDBACK PROCESSING DURING THE PRODUCTION OF A BIMANUAL COORDINATION PATTERN. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[38]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .