Experimental Analysis of a Fixed-Wing VTOL MAV in Ground Effect

More and more complex reconnaissance missions are now expected from miniaturized aerial robots such as Micro Air Vehicles (MAVs). In recent years, the need for aerial platforms capable of both hovering and fast forward flight has been expressed in order to accomplish target recognition in confined environments including outdoor and indoor flights. As a consequence, MAV systems may look fairly different depending on the mission planned: fixed-wing MAVs remains the preferred design for outdoor missions while rotary-wing or flapping-wing MAVs perform better for indoor missions. Therefore, over recent years, new MAV configurations have been investigated in order to carry out multi-tasking missions which include both indoor and outdoor flight phases with horizontal and vertical flight capabilities. Based on the success of the first multi-mission fixed wing coaxial-motor vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) MAV developed by ISAE and the University of Arizona in 2007, ISAE has studied a new tandem-motor VTOL MAV called MAVion since 2008. Although the MAVion concept has not yet demonstrated VTOL and low speed flight capacity, it had demonstrated high flight performance in an urban environment by winning first place in the IMAV09 competition in Florida. Hovering and VTOL capacity, an important key for this kind of multi-mission MAV, is the focus of this paper. Therefore, a dedicated experimental bench has been used to measure hover flight performances, both in terms of propulsion and aerodynamic efficiency. Ground effects have been analyzed in view of predicting the vehicle behavior in take-off and landing phases by using a high performance 5-component Micro-Sting Balance which is specially designed for MAV research.

[1]  Anand Radhakrishnan,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of a Quad Tilt Rotor in Ground Effect , 2003 .

[2]  Anand Radhakrishnan,et al.  Quad Tilt Rotor Aerodynamics in Ground Effect , 2005 .

[3]  Chinnapat Thipyopas,et al.  Aerodynamic performance of a biplane micro air vehicle , 2007 .

[4]  R. Prouty,et al.  Ground effect and the helicopter - A summary , 1985 .

[5]  S. J. Kline,et al.  Describing Uncertainties in Single-Sample Experiments , 1953 .

[6]  Balakrishnan Ganesh,et al.  Study of Ground Vortex Structure of Rotorcraft in Ground Effect at Low Advance Ratios , 2006 .

[7]  Jean-Marc Moschetta,et al.  Development of a VTOL mini UAV for multi-tasking missions , 2009 .

[8]  Chinnapat Thipyopas,et al.  A Fixed-Wing Biplane MAV for Low Speed Missions , 2009 .

[9]  Sergey V Shkarayev,et al.  Aerodynamic Design of Micro Air Vehicles for Vertical Flight , 2008 .

[10]  Green,et al.  Measurements of a Rotor Flow in Ground Effect and Visualisation of the Brown-out Phenomenon , 2008 .

[11]  Barnes W. McCormick,et al.  Aerodynamics of V/STOL flight , 1967 .

[12]  A. M. Kuethe,et al.  Foundations of aerodynamics: bases of aerodynamic design , 1986 .

[13]  W. W. Bower,et al.  A Basic Study of the VTOL Ground Effect Problem for Planar Flow , 1978 .

[14]  A. T. Conlisk,et al.  A Lifting Surface Study of Helicopter Aerodynamics in Ground Effect , 2007 .

[15]  John L. Campbell,et al.  Ground Effects on Lift for Turbofan Powered-Lift STOL Aircraft , 1978 .

[16]  Steven Morris,et al.  Analysis of a Hoverwing in Ground Effect , 2008 .