Repairing ERP

Enterprise resource planning (ERP) software is used to enable organizational change. The challenges of implementing these integrated software products have recently dominated academic and practitioner literatures. Given that it is difficult for organizations to stop such projects once started, the authors'approach is to focus on howto make troubled ERP projects work. A narrative methodology is adopted to analyze a strategic initiative between a university that partnered with an ERP vendor seeking entrance into the higher education market. Through the lens of social ordering, the authors argue against the idea that consensus must be sought in instances of conflict if success is to be realized. Rather, the important thing appears to be coordinating action that will allowgoals to be achieved, even if this involves compromise. Such compromise depends on reciprocity to produce order and does not expect a shared aim as long as a solution can be negotiated.

[1]  A. Gouldner.  THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[2]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[3]  Kenneth I. Winston,et al.  The Forms and Limits of Adjudication , 1978 .

[4]  B. Loasby.  The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective , 1979 .

[5]  Geoffrey Hall,et al.  Telling tales , 1985, Nature.

[6]  Nils Brunsson.  The Irrational Organization: Irrationality as a Basis for Organizational Action and Change , 1985 .

[7]  J. Bruner.  Acts of meaning , 1990 .

[8]  Richard J. Boland,et al.  Technologies of inscribing and organizing: Emerging research agendas , 1991 .

[9]  D. Dougherty.  Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[10]  R. S. Meyers.  Managing With Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations , 1992 .

[11]  Jan Weglarz,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[12]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  Designing Information Technology to Support Distributed Cognition Ceo Publication G 93-16 (236) Designing Information Technology to Support Distributed Cognition Designing Information Technology to Support Distributed Cognition , 1994 .

[13]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[14]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Theories that Explain Contradiction: Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology , 1995, ICIS.

[15]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[16]  J. Mouritsen,et al.  Accountability : power, ethos, and the technologies of managing , 1996 .

[17]  Barbara Czarniawska.  Narrating the Organization: Dramas of Institutional Identity , 1997 .

[18]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  Felix Stalder,et al.  Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[20]  Stephen A. Webb,et al.  ON THE NATURE OF FUTURE WORLDS? - CONSIDERATIONS OF VIRTUALITY AND UTOPIAS , 2000 .

[21]  James Cornford,et al.  THE VIRTUAL UNIVERSITY IS . . . THE UNIVERSITY MADE CONCRETE? , 2000 .

[22]  Neil Pollock,et al.  THE VIRTUAL UNIVERSITY AS 'TIMELY AND ACCURATE INFORMATION' , 2000 .

[23]  Dave Swartz,et al.  Higher Education ERP: Lessons Learned. , 2001 .

[24]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Proceedings of the IFIP TC8/WG8.2 Working Conference on Realigning Research and Practice in Information Systems Development: The Social and Organizational Perspective , 2001 .

[25]  Angela Lin,et al.  Mission Critical: Realizing the Promise of Enterprise Systems , 2001 .

[26]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  Thomas Kern,et al.  Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation: Stories of Power, Politics, and Resistance , 2001, Realigning Research and Practice in Information Systems Development.

[28]  William J. Peterson.  Erp Trends , 2001 .

[29]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An Exploratory Study of the Dialectics of Change , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Judy E. Scott,et al.  Managing risks in enterprise systems implementations , 2002, CACM.

[31]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Temporal Issues in Information and Communication Technology-Enabled Organizational Change: Evidence From an Enterprise Systems Implementation , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[32]  Adel M. Aladwani.  IT project uncertainty, planning and success: An empirical investigation from Kuwait , 2002, Inf. Technol. People.

[33]  Erica L. Wagner,et al.  Networks, negotiations, and new times: the implementation of enterprise resource planning into an academic administration , 2003, Inf. Organ..

[34]  R. Hess.  Power in organizations. , 2003, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[35]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  Integrating diverse ERP systems: a case study , 2004, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[36]  Sue Newell,et al.  'Best' for whom?: the tension between 'best practice' ERP packages and diverse epistemic cultures in a university context , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[38]  R. Florida,et al.  America's looming creativity crisis , 2004, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[39]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.