Eye movement analysis with switching hidden Markov models

Here we propose the eye movement analysis with switching hidden Markov model (EMSHMM) approach to analyzing eye movement data in cognitive tasks involving cognitive state changes. We used a switching hidden Markov model (SHMM) to capture a participant’s cognitive state transitions during the task, with eye movement patterns during each cognitive state being summarized using a regular HMM. We applied EMSHMM to a face preference decision-making task with two pre-assumed cognitive states—exploration and preference-biased periods—and we discovered two common eye movement patterns through clustering the cognitive state transitions. One pattern showed both a later transition from the exploration to the preference-biased cognitive state and a stronger tendency to look at the preferred stimulus at the end, and was associated with higher decision inference accuracy at the end; the other pattern entered the preference-biased cognitive state earlier, leading to earlier above-chance inference accuracy in a trial but lower inference accuracy at the end. This finding was not revealed by any other method. As compared with our previous HMM method, which assumes no cognitive state change (i.e., EMHMM), EMSHMM captured eye movement behavior in the task better, resulting in higher decision inference accuracy. Thus, EMSHMM reveals and provides quantitative measures of individual differences in cognitive behavior/style, making a significant impact on the use of eyetracking to study cognitive behavior across disciplines.

[1]  J. MacQueen Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[2]  D. Coppola,et al.  Idiosyncratic characteristics of saccadic eye movements when viewing different visual environments , 1999, Vision Research.

[3]  Joseph R. Ferrari,et al.  Examining Behavioral Processes in Indecision: Decisional Procrastination and Decision-Making Style , 2000 .

[4]  Paul De Boeck,et al.  A measurement scale for indecisiveness and its relationship to career indecision and other types of indecision , 2002 .

[5]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Global and local covert visual attention: Evidence from a bayesian hidden markov model , 2003 .

[7]  Ratna Babu Chinnam,et al.  Hierarchical HMMs for Autonomous Diagnostics and Prognostics , 2006, The 2006 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network Proceedings.

[8]  Mitsuru Ishizuka,et al.  AutoSelect: What You Want Is What You Get: Real-Time Processing of Visual Attention and Affect , 2006, PIT.

[9]  Ulf Ahlstrom,et al.  Using eye movement activity as a correlate of cognitive workload , 2006 .

[10]  R. Altman Mixed Hidden Markov Models , 2007 .

[11]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Interrupting the cascade: Orienting contributes to decision making even in the absence of visual stimulation , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  John M Henderson,et al.  Stable individual differences across images in human saccadic eye movements. , 2008, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[13]  Klaus Opwis,et al.  Eye-tracking the cancellation and focus model for preference judgments , 2008 .

[14]  R. Pieters,et al.  Eye-Movement Analysis of Search Effectiveness , 2008 .

[15]  Peter Muris,et al.  Indecisiveness and informational tunnel vision , 2008 .

[16]  Ilpo Kojo,et al.  Using hidden Markov model to uncover processing states from eye movements in information search tasks , 2008, Cognitive Systems Research.

[17]  S. Shirmohammadi,et al.  A Hierarchical HMM Model for Online Gaming Traffic Patterns , 2008, 2008 IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference.

[18]  Eyal M. Reingold,et al.  Predicting preference from fixations , 2009, PsychNology J..

[19]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  Does In-Store Marketing Work? Effects of the Number and Position of Shelf Facings on Brand Attention and Evaluation at the Point of Purchase , 2009 .

[20]  Dana H. Ballard,et al.  Recognizing Behavior in Hand-Eye Coordination Patterns , 2009, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[21]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Gaze and Preference-Orienting Behavior as a Somatic Precursor of Preference Decision , 2010 .

[22]  Takahiro Sekiguchi,et al.  Individual differences in face memory and eye fixation patterns during face learning. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[23]  Nicola C. Anderson,et al.  Curious eyes: Individual differences in personality predict eye movement behavior in scene-viewing , 2012, Cognition.

[24]  W. Poynter,et al.  Individuals exhibit idiosyncratic eye-movement behavior profiles across tasks , 2013, Vision Research.

[25]  John M. Henderson,et al.  Predicting Cognitive State from Eye Movements , 2013, PloS one.

[26]  Antoni B. Chan,et al.  Clustering hidden Markov models with variational HEM , 2012, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[27]  Tim Chuk,et al.  Understanding eye movements in face recognition using hidden Markov models. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[28]  Nicola C. Anderson,et al.  The influence of personality on social attention , 2014 .

[29]  D. Ballard,et al.  Modeling Task Control of Eye Movements , 2014, Current Biology.

[30]  C. Chan,et al.  A validation study of the Hong Kong version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (HK-MoCA) in Chinese older adults in Hong Kong. , 2014, Hong Kong medical journal = Xianggang yi xue za zhi.

[31]  James J. Clark,et al.  An inverse Yarbus process: Predicting observers’ task from eye movement patterns , 2014, Vision Research.

[32]  Thierry Baccino,et al.  Discriminating cognitive processes with eye movements in a decision-making driving task. , 2014 .

[33]  Garrison W. Cottrell,et al.  Humans have idiosyncratic and task-specific scanpaths for judging faces , 2015, Vision Research.

[34]  Tim Chuk,et al.  Is having similar eye movement patterns during face learning and recognition beneficial for recognition performance? Evidence from hidden Markov modeling , 2017, Vision Research.

[35]  Tim Chuk,et al.  Hidden Markov model analysis reveals the advantage of analytic eye movement patterns in face recognition across cultures , 2017, Cognition.

[36]  Antoni B. Chan,et al.  Eye-movement patterns in face recognition are associated with cognitive decline in older adults , 2018, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  Antoine Coutrot,et al.  Scanpath modeling and classification with hidden Markov models , 2017, Behavior Research Methods.

[38]  Antoni B. Chan,et al.  Individuals with insomnia misrecognize angry faces as fearful faces while missing the eyes: an eye-tracking study , 2018, Sleep.