Knowledge Management of Web Financial Reporting in Human-Computer Interactive Perspective.

Handling and analyzing to web financial data is becoming a challenge issue in knowledge management and education to accounting practitioners. eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL), which is a type of web financial reporting, describes and recognizes financial items by tagging metadata. The goal is to make it possible for financial reports to be handled accurately and to be analyzed automatically via human-computer interactive approach. To solve the issues that analyzing financial data might create, (1) a decidable Tableau algorithm for description logic DLRBR is proposed; (2) a formalization approach about part-whole relationship in XBRL is proposed; (3) consistency checking and logical reasoning of XBRL metadata is discussed; (4) then a human-computer interactive prototype system is developed to verify the proposed method. The results can help prompting the ability of knowledge management and education in accountings.

[1]  Ding Pan,et al.  Construction and Checking to XBRL Semantic Meta-model , 2012 .

[2]  Arputharaj Kannan,et al.  An Ontology Based Framework for Intelligent Web Based e-Learning , 2015, Int. J. Intell. Inf. Technol..

[3]  J. Efrim Boritz,et al.  Security in Xml-Based Financial Reporting Services on the Internet , 2005 .

[4]  Sören Auer,et al.  Mapping XML to OWL Ontologies , 2005, Leipziger Informatik-Tage.

[5]  Marlene Plumlee,et al.  Assurance on XBRL for Financial Reporting , 2008 .

[6]  Joanne Locke,et al.  XBRL: An (Open) Source of Enlightenment or Disillusion? , 2007 .

[7]  Marcus Spies An ontology modelling perspective on business reporting , 2010, Inf. Syst..

[8]  Yu-Che Chen,et al.  A comparative study of e-government XBRL implementations: The potential of improving information transparency and efficiency , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[9]  Edward Curry,et al.  XBRL and open data for global financial ecosystems: A linked data approach , 2012, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Eric E. Cohen CAP Forum on E‐Business: Compromise or Customize: XBRL's Paradoxical Power , 2004 .

[11]  Indrit Troshani,et al.  Translation in XBRL standardization , 2010, Inf. Technol. People.

[12]  Thierry Declerck,et al.  Translating XBRL Into Description Logic. An Approach Using Protege, Sesame & OWL , 2006, BIS.

[13]  Laureen A. Maines,et al.  Does Search-facilitating Technology Improve the Transparency of Financial Reporting? , 2004 .

[14]  Sergey Melnik,et al.  Generic Model Management , 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[15]  Vladan Devedzic,et al.  Converting UML to OWL ontologies , 2004, WWW Alt. '04.

[16]  Carsten Felden,et al.  Does it add up? Early evidence on the data quality of XBRL filings to the SEC , 2010 .

[17]  Eric E. Cohen,et al.  XBRL: The standardised business language for 21st century reporting and governance , 2005 .

[18]  Gracián Triviño,et al.  Combining Semantic Web technologies and Computational Theory of Perceptions for text generation in financial analysis , 2010, International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.

[19]  Min Liu,et al.  An ontology-augmented XBRL extended model for financial information analysis , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Intelligent Systems.

[20]  Steven D. Sheetz,et al.  The determinants of inter-organizational and internal in-house adoption of XBRL: A structural equation model , 2012, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  The Semantic Web: The Roles of XML and RDF , 2000, IEEE Internet Comput..

[22]  Shaomin Li,et al.  Costs and benefits of XBRL adoption: early evidence , 2008, CACM.

[23]  Zarul Fitri Zaaba,et al.  Computer Security Issues in Online Banking: An Assessment from the Context of Usable Security , 2016 .

[24]  Susan P. Williams,et al.  Online business reporting: An information management perspective , 2006, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[25]  Ding Pan,et al.  Consistency Checking of XBRL Based on a Description Logic DLRBR , 2012 .

[26]  Wen-Lung Shiau,et al.  The Intellectual Structure of Human Computer Interaction Research , 2016, J. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[27]  Li Ding,et al.  Representing Financial Reports on the Semantic Web: - A Faithful Translation from XBRL to OWL , 2010, RuleML.

[28]  Alfred Wagenhofer Accrual-Based Compensation, Depreciation and Investment Decisions , 1999 .

[29]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: the making of a Web Ontology Language , 2003, J. Web Semant..

[30]  L. Yao,et al.  XBRL’s impact on analyst forecast behavior: An empirical study , 2014 .

[31]  Patricia Ordóñez de Pablos,et al.  Analysis of XBRL documents representing financial statements using Semantic Web Technologies , 2007 .

[32]  Hong-Xia Zhang,et al.  Abnormal objective recognition in video based on data mining of finance industry , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (ICMLC).

[33]  Ying Wang,et al.  The Design and Building of Metadata Model in XBRL Taxonomy Engineering , 2011, 2011 Fourth International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design.

[34]  Patricia Ordóñez de Pablos,et al.  A Semantic Based Collaborative System for the Interoperability of XBRL Accounting Information , 2008, WSKS.

[35]  Pablo Castells,et al.  Semantic Web Technologies for Economic and Financial Information Management , 2004, ESWS.

[36]  Harris Wu,et al.  Quality of data standards: framework and illustration using XBRL taxonomy and instances , 2011, Electron. Mark..

[37]  Hangjung Zo,et al.  Does XBRL adoption reduce information asymmetry , 2011 .

[38]  Douglas Herrmann,et al.  A Taxonomy of Part-Whole Relations , 1987, Cogn. Sci..