Experimental and simplified model study of the development of ground settlement under hazards induced by loss of groundwater and sand

Most catastrophic failure in underground engineering is caused by soil and water loss. However, few studies have focused on the evolution of ground deformation during such a process. In this study, model tests were conducted to investigate the flow channel boundary (the interface between the flowing and stationary ground) and ground settlement profile during the flow process of sandy soil and water, and a simplified model was proposed based on the experiment results. The model was validated against measurements from laboratory model tests with fine and medium sand, and the tendency of the simplified model to predict the subsurface ground movement boundary was verified with case records of tunneling, which can also lead to similar soil loss. Finally, parameter analysis was performed according to the simplified model. The study showed that the flow channel boundary could be described by an ellipse for a planar problem (i.e., loosening ellipse). Furthermore, the flow channel boundary was related to the soil loss volume, buried depth of soil extraction location, and eccentricity of the loosening ellipse. The eccentricity of the loosening ellipse decreased with increasing average particle diameter. Peck’s curve could be used to describe the profile of the settlement trough when the mass loss ratio was not >20 %. The ground surface settlement profile changed to the shape of an “inverted triangle” with increased soil loss. The goodness of fit of Peck’s curve to subsurface settlement increased with depth before the deep ground flowed out from the opening. The effect of groundwater flow was considered in the model tests and simplified model to analyze the disaster mechanism, which can provide a reference for the further research.

[1]  A. N. Ryumin On Hydrogeomechanical Causes of Accident in the Subway of Saint Petersburg , 2004 .

[2]  Charles Wang Wai Ng,et al.  Investigation of passive failure and deformation mechanisms due to tunnelling in clay , 2013 .

[3]  P. Attewell,et al.  Ground Deformations Resulting from Shield Tunnelling in London Clay , 1974 .

[4]  Ian D. Moore,et al.  A numerical investigation into the behavior of ground-supported concrete silos filled with saturated solids , 2006 .

[5]  Wei F. Lee,et al.  Forensic diagnosis of a shield tunnel failure , 2010 .

[6]  G. W. Clough,et al.  Design and Performance of Excavations and Tunnels in Soft Clay , 1981 .

[7]  D A Barratt,et al.  MEASUREMENTS OF GROUND MOVEMENT AND LINING BEHAVIOR ON THE LONDON UNDERGROUND AT REGENTS PARK , 1976 .

[8]  Graham J. Weir Incompressible granular flow from wedge-shaped hoppers , 2005 .

[9]  Graham J. Weir,et al.  A mathematical model for dilating, non-cohesive granular flows in steep-walled hoppers , 2004 .

[10]  Zhen-Dong Cui,et al.  Analysis of long-term settlements of Shanghai Subway Line 1 based on the in situ monitoring data , 2014, Natural Hazards.

[11]  M. Bazant,et al.  Velocity profile of granular flows inside silos and hoppers , 2005, cond-mat/0501568.

[12]  Shani Wallis REBUILDING THE RED LINE AT ST PETERSBURG , 2002 .

[13]  Matthew Pierce,et al.  A MODEL FOR GRAVITY FLOW OF FRAGMENTED ROCK IN BLOCK CAVING MINES , 2010 .

[14]  Andrew J. Whittle,et al.  Ground Movements due to Shallow Tunnels in Soft Ground. II: Analytical Interpretation and Prediction , 2014 .

[15]  J. M. Rotter,et al.  A finite element kinematic analysis of planar granular solids flow , 1996 .

[16]  D. Maza,et al.  The flow rate of granular materials through an orifice , 2007, 0707.4550.

[17]  Gang Zheng,et al.  Advance speed-based parametric study of greenfield deformation induced by EPBM tunneling in soft ground , 2015 .

[18]  이정호,et al.  Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics, 6th Edition , 2009 .

[19]  H. Hartman SME mining engineering handbook , 1992 .

[20]  Robert J. Mair,et al.  SUBSURFACE SETTLEMENT PROFILES ABOVE TUNNELS IN CLAYS , 1993 .

[21]  Zenon Mróz,et al.  Investigation of wall stress and outflow rate in a flat-bottomed bin: A comparison of the DEM model results with the experimental measurements , 2011 .

[22]  Yung-Show Fang,et al.  REHABILITATION OF DAMAGED SOFT GROUND TUNNELS , 2006 .

[23]  Jacek Tejchman,et al.  Application of particle image velocimetry (PIV) for deformation measurement during granular silo flow , 2007 .

[24]  Charles Wang Wai Ng,et al.  Analytical approach for estimating ground deformation profile induced by normal faulting in undrained clay , 2013 .

[25]  Wen-Chieh Cheng,et al.  Characterising the failure pattern of a station box of Taipei Rapid Transit System (TRTS) and its rehabilitation , 2012 .

[26]  R. Coppi,et al.  A determination coefficient for a linear regression model with imprecise response , 2011 .

[27]  L. Schwarz,et al.  Risks and hazards caused by groundwater during tunnelling: geotechnical solutions used as demonstrated by recent examples from Tyrol, Austria , 2006 .

[28]  M Korff,et al.  Building damage and repair due to leakage in a deep excavation , 2011 .

[29]  Aibing Yu,et al.  A finite element method for granular flow through a frictional boundary , 2007 .

[30]  Per Tengborg,et al.  Guidelines for tunnelling risk management: International Tunnelling Association, Working Group No. 2 , 2004 .

[31]  R. Peck Deep excavations and tunnelling in soft ground , 1969 .

[32]  Giulia Viggiani,et al.  Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground , 2012 .

[33]  Rimantas Kačianauskas,et al.  Investigation of rice grain flow by multi-sphere particle model with rolling resistance , 2011 .

[34]  Kenichi Soga,et al.  Effect of TBM driving parameters on ground surface movements on Channel Tunnel Rail Link Contract 220 , 2005 .

[35]  Nigel H. Glossop Soil deformations caused by soft-ground tunnelling , 1978 .

[36]  Yun Bai,et al.  Multiphase Risk-Management Method and Its Application in Tunnel Engineering , 2014 .

[37]  Robert J. Mair,et al.  Centrifugal modelling of tunnel construction in soft clay , 1980 .