Maximum non-Gaussianity parameters estimation of ultrasonic echoes and its application in ultrasonic non-destructive evaluation

The accurate estimation of the ultrasonic echo pattern is essential in ultrasonic non-destructive evaluation. In this paper, a generalized parametric ultrasonic echo mode was presented. It is influenced by a set of parameters: bandwidth, arrival time, center frequency, amplitude and phase. The maximum non-Gaussianity and amplitude (MNA) principle is used to estimate these parameters. Analytically, the MNA algorithm can estimate the echo parameters accurately. Furthermore, an optimal parameter matched filter is designed with the estimated parameters to eliminate the initial phase of the ultrasonic echo. As a result, only the correlated portion remained; then, the time of arrival (TOA) and/or time of flight (TOF) of each echo can be estimated directly from the radio frequency representation of the processed ultrasonic signals. Numerical simulation and experimental results show that the optimal parameter matched filter is effective in noise suppression with improved detection signals and greater position estimation accuracy.

[1]  J. Saniie,et al.  Pattern recognition in the ultrasonic imaging of reverberant multilayered structures , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[2]  E. Oja,et al.  Independent Component Analysis , 2013 .

[3]  Tao Wang,et al.  Statistical evaluation of backscattered ultrasonic grain signals , 1988 .

[4]  J. Saniie,et al.  Model-based estimation of ultrasonic echoes. Part I: Analysis and algorithms , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[5]  Hamid Sheikhzadeh,et al.  Improving the time-resolution and signal-to-noise ratio of ultrasonic NDE signals , 2004 .

[6]  Pei-wen Que,et al.  Wavelet based noise suppression technique and its application to ultrasonic flaw detection. , 2006, Ultrasonics.

[7]  E. Madsen,et al.  Non-Gaussian versus non-Rayleigh statistical properties of ultrasound echo signals , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  J. D’hooge,et al.  Statistics of the radio-frequency signal based on K distribution with application to echocardiography , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  Jafar Saniie ULTRASONIC SIGNAL PROCESSING: SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION AND PARAMETER ESTIMATION OF REVERBERANT AND INHOMOGENEOUS TARGETS , 1981 .

[10]  J. Saniie,et al.  Ultrasonic data compression via parameter estimation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[11]  J.A. Jensen,et al.  Use of modulated excitation signals in medical ultrasound. Part I: basic concepts and expected benefits , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[12]  F. Foster,et al.  Non-Gaussian statistics and temporal variations of the ultrasound signal backscattered by blood at frequencies between 10 and 58 MHz. , 2004, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  K. Boone,et al.  Effect of skin impedance on image quality and variability in electrical impedance tomography: a model study , 1996, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[14]  R. Kuc Ultrasonic Tissue Characterization Using Kurtosis , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.