On Geographic Collaborative Forwarding in Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks

In this paper, we study the geographic collaborative forwarding (GCF) scheme, a variant of opportunistic routing, which exploits the broadcast nature and spatial diversity of the wireless medium to improve the packet delivery efficiency. Our goal is to fully understand the principles, the gains, and the tradeoffs of the node collaboration and its associated cost, thus provide insightful analysis and guidance to the design of more efficient routing/forwarding protocols. We first identify the upper bound of the expected packet advancement (EPA) that GCF can achieve and prove the concavity of the maximum EPA. With energy efficiency as a major concern, we propose a new metric, EPA per unit energy consumption, which balances the packet advancement, reliability and energy consumption. By leveraging the proved properties, we then propose an efficient algorithm which selects a feasible candidate set that maximizes this local metric. We validate our analysis results by simulations, and justify the effectiveness of the new metric by comparing the performance of GCF with those of the existing geographic and opportunistic routing schemes.

[1]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  Geographic Random Forwarding (GeRaF) for Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks: Multihop Performance , 2003, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput..

[2]  Srihari Nelakuditi,et al.  Opportunistic Any-Path Forwarding in Multi-Hop Wireless Mesh Networks , 2006 .

[3]  Ramesh Govindan,et al.  Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks , 2003, SenSys '03.

[4]  J. Rabaey,et al.  Joint optimization of a protocol stack for sensor networks , 2004, IEEE MILCOM 2004. Military Communications Conference, 2004..

[5]  Nitin H. Vaidya,et al.  A MAC protocol to reduce sensor network energy consumption using a wakeup radio , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[6]  Robert Tappan Morris,et al.  ExOR: opportunistic multi-hop routing for wireless networks , 2005, SIGCOMM '05.

[7]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  GPS-less low-cost outdoor localization for very small devices , 2000, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[8]  Brad Karp,et al.  GPSR : Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing for Wireless , 2000, MobiCom 2000.

[9]  Jörg Widmer,et al.  Contention-based forwarding for mobile ad hoc networks , 2003, Ad Hoc Networks.

[10]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  Advancement optimization in multihop wireless networks , 2003, 2003 IEEE 58th Vehicular Technology Conference. VTC 2003-Fall (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37484).

[11]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Geometric ad-hoc routing: of theory and practice , 2003, PODC '03.

[12]  A. Savvides,et al.  Title Dynamic Fine-Grained Localization in Ad-Hoc Wireless Sensor Networks , 2001 .

[13]  Seungjoon Lee,et al.  Efficient geographic routing in multihop wireless networks , 2005, MobiHoc '05.

[14]  Marco Zuniga,et al.  Analyzing the transitional region in low power wireless links , 2004, 2004 First Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, 2004. IEEE SECON 2004..

[15]  Ahmed Helmy,et al.  Energy Efficient Forwarding Strategies for Geographic Routing , 2004 .

[16]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  Geographic Random Forwarding (GeRaF) for Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks: Energy and Latency Performance , 2003, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput..

[17]  Robert Tappan Morris,et al.  a high-throughput path metric for multi-hop wireless routing , 2003, MobiCom '03.

[18]  Gregory G. Finn,et al.  Routing and Addressing Problems in Large Metropolitan-Scale Internetworks. ISI Research Report. , 1987 .

[19]  Elif Uysal-Biyikoglu,et al.  Energy-efficient link assessment in wireless sensor networks , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.