Paronomasic puns: Target recoverability towards automatic generation

Hempelmann, Christian F. Ph. D., Purdue University, August, 2003. Paronomasic Puns: Target Recoverability towards Automatic Generation. Major Professor: Victor Raskin. The aim of this dissertation is to create a theory to model the factors, prominently, but not exclusively the phonological similarity, important in imperfect punning and to outline the implementation of this measure for the evaluation of possible imperfect puns given an input word and a set of possible target words. Imperfect, heterophonic, or paronomasic, puns differ from perfect, homophonic puns in that the target is different in sound from the pun. While homophonic puns are interesting for the linguist primarily with respect to their semantics, heterophonic puns present a research issue also to the phonologist, because they use one of two similar sound sequences to stand for both meanings associated with them, for example, bang to denote a noise as well as a financial institution. The specific question here is, how much contrast is possible between the pun and its target to make the latter recoverable, in terms of the semantics, phonology, and syntax of the pun-target pair and its context. The theoretical framework for the phonological part of this project is inspired by a recent version of Optimality Theory (OT), adopted in phonology, because it is able to describe the occurrence of related forms through a selection process from among possible candidate forms more appropriately than derivational approaches can by way of rules operating on one input form and

[1]  Salvatore Attardo,et al.  Non-literalness and non-bona-fîde in language: An approach to formal and computational treatments of humor , 1994 .

[2]  BERNARD COMRIE.  Morphophonemic exceptions and phonetic distance , 1979 .

[3]  S. Attardo.  Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis , 2001 .

[4]  Geoffrey d. Chaucer,et al.  The Works Of Geoffrey Chaucer , 1957 .

[5]  Sergei Nirenburg,et al.  Why NLP Should Move into IAS , 2002, RAODMAP@COLING.

[6]  S. Attardo,et al.  The semantic foundations of cognitive theories of humor , 1997 .

[7]  Bruce Tesar,et al.  Computational optimality theory , 1996 .

[8]  Wilson L. Taylor,et al.  “Cloze Procedure”: A New Tool for Measuring Readability , 1953 .

[9]  Roman Jakobson,et al.  The Sound Shape of Language , 1979 .

[10]  Michael Hammond.  Parsing syllables: modeling OT computationally , 1997, ArXiv.

[11]  Ernest Gallo,et al.  The 'poetria Nova' and Its Sources in Early Rhetorical Doctrine , 1971 .

[12]  William B. McGregor,et al.  Sound symbolism in Gooniyandi, a language of Western Australia , 1996 .

[13]  Hans Marchand.  Phonetic symbolism in English word-formation , 1959 .

[14]  W. Köhler.  Gestalt psychology , 1967 .

[15]  Janis B. Nuckolls,et al.  Sounds like life : sound-symbolic grammar, performance, and cognition in Pastaza Quechua , 1998 .

[16]  Marcus Tullius Cicero,et al.  Ad C. Herennium : de ratione dicendi (Rhetorica ad Herennium) , 1954 .

[17]  V. Fromkin.  Speech errors as linguistic evidence , 1976 .

[18]  H. Marchand.  The categories and types of present-day English word-formation : a synchronic-diachronic approach , 1960 .

[19]  Barbara Johnstone,et al.  The Language of Riddles: New Perspectives , 1985 .

[20]  Dallin D. Oaks,et al.  Structural Ambiguities and Written Advertisements: An Inventory of Tools for More Resourceful Advertisements in English , 1995 .

[21]  Eric Keller,et al.  Sequences of phonemic approximations in aphasia , 1980, Brain and Language.

[22]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[23]  Uwe Wirth.  Diskursive Dummheit : Abduktion und Komik als Grenzphänomene des Verstehens , 1999 .

[24]  Wilhelm von Humboldt.  Linguistic Variability and Intellectual Development (Miami Linguistics Series No. 9) , 1971 .

[25]  K. Binsted.  Using Humour to Make Natural Language Interfaces More Friendly , 1995 .

[26]  Peter Ladefoged,et al.  Vowels and Consonants , 2000, Manchu Grammar.

[27]  Stefan A. Frisch,et al.  Similarity and Frequency in Phonology , 1996 .

[28]  Sergei Nirenburg,et al.  Book Review: Ontological Semantics, by Sergei Nirenburg and Victor Raskin , 2004, CL.

[29]  S. Freud,et al.  Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious , 1905 .

[30]  Eleanor Knott,et al.  An introduction to Irish syllabic poetry of the period 1200-1600 , 1966 .

[31]  D. Bolinger.  The phrasal verb in English , 1974 .

[32]  T. Mark Ellison,et al.  Phonological Derivation in Optimality Theory , 1994, COLING.

[33]  A. E. Crawley,et al.  The Golden Bough: a Study in Magic and Religion , 1911, Nature.

[34]  C. F. Hockett.  A Course in Modern Linguistics , 1959 .

[35]  J. Hooper,et al.  Constraints on schwa-deletion in American English , 1978 .

[36]  Á. Makkai.  Idiom structure in English , 1972 .

[37]  Patrick A. V. Hall,et al.  Approximate String Matching , 1994, Encyclopedia of Algorithms.

[38]  山田 豊.  Biographia Literaria 誕生の歴史 , 1992 .

[39]  Graeme Ritchie,et al.  Current Directions in Computational Humour , 2001, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[40]  Charles Reiss,et al.  Output-Output Correspondence in Optimality Theory , 1997 .

[41]  A. Nijholt,et al.  Humour Research: State of the Art 1 , 2002 .

[42]  M. Kenstowicz.  Base-Identity and Uniform Exponence: Alternatives to Cyclicity , 1995 .

[43]  M. Niepokuj.  The Development of Verbal Reduplication in Indo-European , 1997 .

[44]  J. Crosbie.  Crosbie's Dictionary of Puns , 1977 .

[45]  Elizabeth Hume,et al.  Metathesis: Formal and Functional Considerations , 2001 .

[46]  C. Morris.  Signs, Language and Behavior , 1947 .

[47]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Humor in task-oriented computer-mediated communication and human-computer interaction , 1998, CHI Conference Summary.

[48]  L. Philips,et al.  Hanging on the metaphone , 1990 .

[49]  Laurel J. Brinton,et al.  The Development Of English Aspectual Systems , 1988 .

[50]  C. Strapparava,et al.  HAHAcronym: Humorous Agents for Humorous Acronyms , 2003 .

[51]  E. Cassirer,et al.  Language and Myth , 1948 .

[52]  Robert W. Weisberg,et al.  Linguistics and Humor , 1983 .

[53]  Victor Raskin,et al.  Semantic mechanisms of humor , 1984 .

[54]  Carlo Strapparava,et al.  TWLT20 The April Fools' Day Workshop on Computation Humour , 2002 .

[55]  Paull Franklin Baum,et al.  Chaucer's Puns , 1956, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America.

[56]  Heidi Fleischhacker,et al.  Onset Transfer in Reduplication 1 , 2002 .

[57]  V. Raskin,et al.  Toward an empirical verification of the General Theory of Verbal Humor , 1993 .

[58]  W. B. Stanford.  Ambiguity in Greek literature , 1939 .

[59]  Wolfgang Preisendanz,et al.  Über den Witz , 1970 .

[60]  Barbara Di Eugenio,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on Natural Language Generation , 1998, CL.

[61]  Sidney Greenbaum,et al.  Syntactic frequency and acceptability , 1976 .

[62]  A. Nichols,et al.  Effects of phonetic distance on recognition of synthetic sentences. , 1981, Journal of communication disorders.

[63]  Thomas A. Sebeok,et al.  Contributions to the doctrine of signs , 1976 .

[64]  Dallin D. Oaks.  Enablers of grammatical ambiguity , 1990 .

[65]  Christian F. Hempelmann,et al.  Script oppositions and logical mechanisms: Modeling incongruities and their resolutions , 2002 .

[66]  Kim Binsted,et al.  An Implemented Model of Punning Riddles , 1994, AAAI.

[67]  A. Zwicky,et al.  Well, this Rock and Roll has Got to Stop. Junior's Head is Hard as a Rock , 1976 .

[68]  William S.-Y. Wang,et al.  Perceptual Distance and the Specification of Phonological Features , 1968 .

[69]  A. Nijholt.  Embodied Agents: A New Impetus to Humor Research , 2002 .

[70]  S. Attardo.  Linguistic theories of humor , 1994 .

[71]  Lauri Karttunen,et al.  The Proper Treatment of Optimality in Computational Phonology , 1998, ArXiv.

[72]  Geoffrey d. Chaucer,et al.  The Riverside Chaucer , 1986 .

[73]  Peter Trudgill,et al.  The dialects of England , 1990 .

[74]  Mikhail J. Atallah,et al.  Natural Language Watermarking: Design, Analysis, and a Proof-of-Concept Implementation , 2001, Information Hiding.

[75]  P. Ladefoged.  Vowels and consonants : an introduction to the sounds of languages , 2001 .

[76]  Antinus Nijholt,et al.  Automatic Interpretation and Generation of Verbal Humor : Proceedings of the Twelfth Twente Workshop on Language Technology, joint with International Workshop on Computational Humor , 1996 .

[77]  Mitsuhiko Ota,et al.  Optimality Theory: an overview , 2000 .

[78]  D. Bolinger.  The Atomization of Meaning , 1965 .

[79]  John Coleman,et al.  Stochastic phonological grammars and acceptability , 1997, SIGMORPHON@EACL.

[80]  R. Moon.  Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English: A Corpus-Based Approach , 1998 .

[81]  V. Raskin,et al.  Script theory revis(it)ed: joke similarity and joke representation model , 1991 .

[82]  John J. McCarthy,et al.  Optimality Theory: An overview , 2003 .

[83]  Roman Jakobson,et al.  Fundamentals of Language , 1957 .

[84]  J. Ohala.  Sound Symbolism , 2004, Encyclopedia of Slavic Languages and Linguistics Online.

[85]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Comprehending spoken language: A blueprint of the listener , 1999 .

[86]  Alan S. Prince,et al.  Faithfulness and reduplicative identity , 1995 .

[87]  Geoffrey de fl. Vinsauf,et al.  Poetria Nova of Geoffrey of Vinsauf , 1967 .

[88]  V. Fromkin.  Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue , 1982 .

[89]  P. Vitz,et al.  Predicting the judged “similarity of sound” of english words , 1973 .

[90]  K. Binsted,et al.  Computational rules for generating punning riddles , 1997 .

[91]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[92]  Michael Kenstowicz,et al.  Phonology In Generative Grammar , 1994 .

[93]  Richard Lutz,et al.  Measuring Phonological Similarity: The Case of Personal Names , 2003 .

[94]  Maurice Bloomfield.  On Assimilation and Adaptation in Congeneric Classes of Words , 1895 .