Multi-taxa population connectivity in the Northern Rocky Mountains

Effective broad-spectrum biodiversity conservation requires that conservation strategies simultaneously meet the needs of multiple species. However, little is known about how maintaining habitat connectivity for one species or species group may also act as an umbrella for other species. We evaluated the degree to which predicted connected habitat for each of 144 different hypothetical organisms expressing range of dispersal abilities and ecological responses to elevation, roads and land cover function as an indicators of connected habitat for the others in the U.S. Northern Rocky Mountains. We used resistant kernel modeling to map the extent of the study area predicted to be connected by dispersal for each species. At relatively large dispersal abilities there was extensive overlap between connected habitat for most organisms and much of the study area is predicted to provide connected habitat for all hypothetical organisms simultaneously. In contrast, at low to medium dispersal abilities there was much less intersection of habitat connected by dispersal. We found that habitat specialists with limited dispersal ability are weak indicators of others, and likewise are weakly indicated by others. We evaluated the effectiveness of three carnivores as connectivity umbrellas for many species. All three carnivore species performed significantly worse as connectivity umbrellas than the average across the simulated species. These species are associated with high elevation forested habitats. It is the low elevation and non-forest habitats that are most at risk of habitat loss and fragmentation in the study area, suggesting that a carnivore umbrella may miss many species most at risk.

[1]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Habitat Fragmentation Effects Depend on Complex Interactions Between Population Size and Dispersal Ability: Modeling Influences of Roads, Agriculture and Residential Development Across a Range of Life-History Characteristics , 2010 .

[2]  R. Hobbs The role of corridors in conservation: Solution or bandwagon? , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  K. McGarigal,et al.  Issues and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology: The gradient concept of landscape structure , 2005 .

[4]  Todd R. Lookingbill,et al.  A Multiscale Network Analysis of Protected‐Area Connectivity for Mammals in the United States , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[5]  Nick M. Haddad,et al.  CORRIDOR USE BY DIVERSE TAXA , 2003 .

[6]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Gene Flow in Complex Landscapes: Testing Multiple Hypotheses with Causal Modeling , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[7]  S. Vignieri,et al.  Streams over mountains: influence of riparian connectivity on gene flow in the Pacific jumping mouse (Zapus trinotatus) , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[8]  Emilio M. Bruna,et al.  Habitat fragmentation and large‐scale conservation: what do we know for sure? , 1999 .

[9]  S. Cushman,et al.  Use of Empirically Derived Source‐Destination Models to Map Regional Conservation Corridors , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[10]  Reed F. Noss,et al.  A Regional Landscape Approach to Maintain Diversity , 1983 .

[11]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  A Resistant‐Kernel Model of Connectivity for Amphibians that Breed in Vernal Pools , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[12]  Jean-Michel Roberge,et al.  Usefulness of the Umbrella Species Concept as a Conservation Tool , 2004 .

[13]  S. Cushman,et al.  Inferring landscape effects on gene flow: a new model selection framework , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[14]  P. Beier,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of least-cost modeling for designing wildlife linkages. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[15]  A. U.S.,et al.  Movement Corridors : Conservation Bargains or Poor Investments ? , 2022 .

[16]  Paul Beier,et al.  In My Experience: A Checklist for Evaluating Impacts to Wildlife Movement Corridors , 1992 .

[17]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Scale dependent inference in landscape genetics , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[18]  M. Soulé,et al.  Viable Populations for Conservation: List of contributors , 1987 .

[19]  R. Lambeck,et al.  Focal Species: a Multi-species Umbrella for Nature Conservation Focal Species for Nature Conservation Lambeck , 2022 .

[20]  R. Noss,et al.  CARNIVORES AS FOCAL SPECIES FOR CONSERVATION PLANNING IN THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGION , 2001 .

[21]  Erin L. Landguth,et al.  UNICOR: a species connectivity and corridor network simulator , 2012 .

[22]  Barry R. Noon,et al.  Biological Corridors: Form, Function, and Efficacy , 1997 .

[23]  Joanna Grand,et al.  A Multiscale Landscape Approach to Predicting Bird and Moth Rarity Hotspots in a Threatened Pitch Pine–Scrub Oak Community , 2004 .

[24]  Erik Matthysen,et al.  The application of 'least-cost' modelling as a functional landscape model , 2003 .

[25]  S. Cushman,et al.  Simulating the effects of climate change on population connectivity of American marten (Martes americana) in the northern Rocky Mountains, USA , 2011, Landscape Ecology.

[26]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: A review and prospectus , 2006 .

[27]  C. L. Shafer,et al.  NATURE RESERVES - Island Theory and Conservation Practice , 1991 .

[28]  Jeffrey R Dunk,et al.  Optimizing resiliency of reserve networks to climate change: multispecies conservation planning in the Pacific Northwest, USA , 2010 .

[29]  Paul B Eier,et al.  South Coast Missing Linkages: restoring connectivity to wildlands in the largest metropolitan area in the USA , 2006 .

[30]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  The Gradient Paradigm: A conceptual and analytical framework for landscape ecology [Chapter 5] , 2010 .

[31]  Neil J. Anderson,et al.  Wolverine gene flow across a narrow climatic niche. , 2009, Ecology.

[32]  George R. Hess,et al.  Communicating clearly about conservation corridors , 2001 .

[33]  J. Berger,et al.  Connecting the dots: an invariant migration corridor links the Holocene to the present , 2006, Biology Letters.

[34]  L. Ruggiero,et al.  Resilience and conservation of large carnivores in the Rocky Mountains , 1996 .

[35]  Dennis D. Murphy,et al.  A NEW METHOD FOR SELECTION OF UMBRELLA SPECIES FOR CONSERVATION PLANNING , 2000 .

[36]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective , 1980 .

[37]  G. Luikart,et al.  Why replication is important in landscape genetics: American black bear in the Rocky Mountains , 2011, Molecular ecology.

[38]  Paul Beier,et al.  Use of Land Facets to Plan for Climate Change: Conserving the Arenas, Not the Actors , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[39]  Paul C. Paquet,et al.  Conservation Biology and Carnivore Conservation in the Rocky Mountains , 1996 .

[40]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure , 1993 .

[41]  P. Beier,et al.  Do Habitat Corridors Provide Connectivity? , 1998 .

[42]  R. East Species-area curves and populations of large mammals in African savanna reserves , 1981 .

[43]  David O. Wallin,et al.  Spatial scaling and multi-model inference in landscape genetics: Martes americana in northern Idaho , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[44]  A. Storfer,et al.  Landscape genetics of the blotched tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum melanostictum) , 2005, Molecular ecology.