Estimation error of Leydig cell numbers in atrophied rat testes due to the assumption of spherical nuclei

In this study, Leydig cell numbers in control and atrophied testes (induced via subcutaneous implants of testosterone plus 17β estradiol for 16 weeks; TE‐implanted) of rats, estimated via the fractionator method (independent of any assumptions) were compared to those estimated via the disector (unbiased, but dependent on shrinkage) and Floderus (assumes spherical particles, dependent on shrinkage) methods. Estimates of Leydig cell numbers in control rats produced by all three stereological methods were similar. In rats with atrophied testes, both the fractionator and the disector methods produced significantly lower (P < 0.01; 47% and 41 % with fractionator and disector, respectively) Leydig cell number estimates per testis than in the controls. By contrast, the estimates of Leydig cell number in atrophied testes derived via the Floderus equation were not significantly different from those of controls, but larger than those obtained via the fractionator and the disector methods. These results suggested that the assumptions of the Floderus method were violated in the atrophied rat testes.

[1]  S M Mendis-Handagama,et al.  Sources of error in the estimation of Leydig cell numbers in control and atrophied mammalian testes , 1990, Journal of microscopy.

[2]  B. Zirkin,et al.  Effect of luteinizing hormone on Leydig cell structure and testosterone secretion. , 1983, Endocrinology.

[3]  R. Østerby,et al.  Optimizing sampling efficiency of stereological studies in biology: or ‘Do more less well!‘ , 1981, Journal of microscopy.

[4]  B. Zirkin,et al.  Leydig cell structure and steroidogenic function. , 1983, Recent progress in hormone research.

[5]  H. Mori,et al.  Morphometric analysis of Leydig cells in the normal rat testis , 1980, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  M. Dym,et al.  Response of adult rat Sertoli cells and Leydig cells to depletion of luteinizing hormone and testosterone. , 1977, Biology of reproduction.

[7]  L. Cruz-Orive Estimating Particle Number and Size , 1985 .

[8]  H. Gundersen Stereology of arbitrary particles * , 1986, Journal of microscopy.

[9]  E. Weibel Practical methods for biological morphometry , 1979 .

[10]  H. J. G. Gundersen,et al.  The new stereological tools: Disector, fractionator, nucleator and point sampled intercepts and their use in pathological research and diagnosis , 1988, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[11]  D. C. Sterio The unbiased estimation of number and sizes of arbitrary particles using the disector , 1984, Journal of microscopy.

[12]  S. M. Shea,et al.  The precise measurement of the thickness of ultrathin sections by a ‘re‐sectioned’ section technique , 1975 .

[13]  C. Desjardins,et al.  Synergistic interaction of testosterone and oestradiol inhibits permatogenesis in rats , 1977, Nature.

[14]  L. M. Cruz Orive,et al.  On the estimation of particle number. , 1980, Journal of microscopy.

[15]  L. M. Orive,et al.  On the estimation of particle number , 1980 .