Learning materials development has traditionally been controlled by individual academics as distance education followed organisational models provided by traditional face to face teaching. Recent developments in both education and training have increased expectations of distance education. Increasing student participation rates, accessibility of higher education, increasing costs and exponential growth of knowledge are some factors that require development of innovative approaches to meet these expectations. Quality management literature suggests that these challenges may be met by a flexible but systematic, participative and team-based approach using quality improvement strategies. Developments in educational evaluation indicate that quality is promoted by an action-evaluation paradigm based on critical theory. Action evaluation promotes information gathering directed towards the making of specific decisions, a systems approach to evaluation, participative democracy in both decision making and evaluation and reflective practice. A marriage is proposed between action evaluation and quality management to guide the development of quality in distance education. Three strategies are suggested immediately: use of a team approach to materials development that is genuinely participative and democratic, collection of information about the quality of service provided to students in a way that promotes systematic improvement in the quality of that service and finally examination of all relevant aspects of educational services provided. This paper discusses the initial stages of the trial of such an approach as it is being developed within the Department of Mathematics and Computing at the University College of Central Queensland.
[1]
C. Power.
Exemplary practice in science and mathematics education: K. Tobin and B.J. Fraser (Eds.), Perth: Curtin University of Technology, 1987, pp. 120, ISBN 090 9848 815
,
1988
.
[2]
Michael F. Beaudoin.
The instructor's changing role in distance education
,
1990
.
[3]
Loretta A. Nielsen,et al.
Program Evaluation as an Evolutionary Process
,
1983
.
[4]
Theory Z: The Promise for U.S. Schools.
,
1985
.
[5]
Stephen Kemmis,et al.
Seven Principles for Programme Evaluation in Curriculum Development and Innovation
,
1982
.
[6]
David Nevo,et al.
The Conceptualization of Educational Evaluation: An Analytical Review of the Literature
,
1983
.
[7]
J. S. Dawkins,et al.
Higher education: a policy statement
,
1988
.
[8]
Jürgen Habermas,et al.
Toward A Rational Society
,
1970
.
[9]
Robin Barrow.
Moral Philosophy for Education
,
1975
.
[10]
Frank Price,et al.
Right First Time
,
1986
.
[11]
B. Holmes.
Comparative Education: Some Considerations of Method
,
1981
.
[12]
R. G. Owens.
Organizational behavior in education
,
1970
.
[13]
Joseph Moses Juran.
Juran on Leadership For Quality
,
1989
.
[14]
Corporate Xerox Press Staff.
Xerox Publishing Standards: A Manual of Style and Design
,
1988
.