Considering the nature of scientific problems when designing science curricula

A recurring theme of science education reform has been the creation of classroom opportunities that allow students to develop insights into the professional practice of scientists. The posing and solving of problems of a variety of types, a process central to scientific practice, provides a useful framework for structuring such opportunities for students. Most problems that students encounter can be characterized as model–data fit problems, in which solvers fit available data to an appropriate explanatory model. Although these problems are important, we argue that it is essential to expand the range of problems students encounter to include those that require solvers to confront the conceptual coherence of their explanatory models and to examine the relationship of those models to other scientific models, methodological norms, and common worldviews. In this article, we describe the nature and existence of both model–data fit and conceptual problems in science and then examine two curricular projects, one in genetics and one in evolutionary biology, that attempt to integrate these problems into classroom instruction. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Sci Ed85:207–222, 2001.

[1]  P Kitcher,et al.  1953 and all that: a tale of two sciences. , 1984, The Philosophical review.

[2]  James A. Stewart,et al.  Using philosophy of science in curriculum development: an example from high school genetics , 1990 .

[3]  Ernst Mayr,et al.  One Long Argument: Charles Darwin and the Genesis of Modern Evolutionary Thought. , 1992 .

[4]  R. Hafner,et al.  Elaborating the structures of a science discipline to improve problem-solving instruction: An account of Classical Genetics' theory structure, function, and development , 1996 .

[5]  Ola Halldén,et al.  The evolution of the species: pupil perspectives and school perspectives , 1988 .

[6]  Reinout W. Wiers,et al.  Children's thoughts on the origin of species: A study of explanatory coherence , 1997 .

[7]  John L. Rudolph,et al.  Evolution and the nature of science: On the historical discord and its implications for education , 1998 .

[8]  D. Hull Darwin and His Critics: The Reception of Darwin's Theory of Evolution by the Scientific Community , 1973 .

[9]  Jon H. Roberts Darwinism and the Divine In America: Protestant Intellectuals and Organic Evolution, 1859-1900 , 1988 .

[10]  L. Darden Theory Change in Science: Strategies from Mendelian Genetics , 1991 .

[11]  P. Kitcher,et al.  The advancement of science : science without legend, objectivity without illusions , 1995 .

[12]  Robert Hafner,et al.  Extending the conception of “problem” in problem‐solving research , 1991 .

[13]  L. Laudan Science as Problem-Solving. (Book Reviews: Progress and Its Problems. Toward a Theory of Scientific Growth) , 1977 .

[14]  A. Ahlgren,et al.  Science for all Americans , 1990 .

[15]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[16]  James A. Stewart,et al.  Strategies for model‐revision in a high school genetics classroom , 1994 .

[17]  J. Stewart,et al.  Revising explanatory models to accommodate anomalous genetic phenomena: Problem solving in the “context of discovery” , 1995 .

[18]  E. Finkel,et al.  Science as Model Building: Computers and High-School Genetics , 1992 .

[19]  James A. Stewart,et al.  Potential learning outcomes from solving genetics problems: A typology of problems , 1988 .

[20]  Murray S. Jensen,et al.  Teaching evolution using historical arguments in a conceptual change strategy , 1995 .