Bayesian temporal source attribution of foodborne zoonoses: Campylobacter in Finland and Norway.

Statistical source attribution approaches of food-related zoonoses can generally be based on reported diagnosed human cases and surveillance results from different food sources or reservoirs of bacteria. The attribution model, or probabilistic classifier, can thus be based on the (sub)typing information enabling comparison between human infections and samples derived from source surveillance. Having time series of both data allows analyzing temporal patterns over time providing a repeated natural experiment. A Bayesian approach combining both sources of information over a long time series is presented in the case of Campylobacter in Finland and Norway. The full model is transparently presented and derived from the Bayes theorem. Previous statistical source attribution approaches are here advanced (1) by explicit modeling of the cases not associated with any of the sources under surveillance over time, (2) by modeling uncertain prevalence in a food source by bacteria type over time, and (3) by implementing formal model fit assessment using posterior predictive discrepancy functions. Large proportion of all campylobacteriosis can be attributed to broiler, but considerable uncertainty remains over time. The source attribution is inherently incomplete if only the sources under surveillance are included in the model. All statistical source attribution approaches should include a model fit assessment for judgment of model performance with respect to relevant quantities of interest. It is especially relevant when the model aims at a synthesis of several incomplete information sources under significant uncertainty of explanatory variables.

[1]  Jeff Harrison,et al.  Applied Bayesian Forecasting and Time Series Analysis , 1994 .

[2]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification (2nd ed.) , 1999 .

[3]  Neville Davies,et al.  Time Series Models, 2nd Edn. , 1995 .

[4]  Simon E F Spencer,et al.  Source Attribution of Food‐Borne Zoonoses in New Zealand: A Modified Hald Model , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  E. Engvall,et al.  Trends in Campylobacter incidence in broilers and humans in six European countries, 1997-2007. , 2010, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[6]  John Skilling,et al.  Data analysis : a Bayesian tutorial , 1996 .

[7]  Evers Eg,et al.  Campylobacter source attribution by exposure assessment , 2008 .

[8]  Tine Hald,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to Quantify the Contribution of Animal‐Food Sources to Human Salmonellosis , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[9]  A. Gelman A Bayesian Formulation of Exploratory Data Analysis and Goodness‐of‐fit Testing * , 2003 .

[10]  L. Paulin,et al.  Longitudinal Study of Finnish Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli Isolates from Humans, Using Multilocus Sequence Typing, Including Comparison with Epidemiological Data and Isolates from Poultry and Cattle , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[11]  J. Sofos,et al.  Scientific Opinion on Quantification of the risk posed by broiler meat to human campylobacteriosis in the EU 1 EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards ( BIOHAZ ) , 2010 .

[12]  H. Herikstad,et al.  Factors associated with increased and decreased risk of Campylobacter infection: a prospective case-control study in Norway. , 2003, American journal of epidemiology.

[13]  Volker Schmid,et al.  A two-component model for counts of infectious diseases. , 2005, Biostatistics.

[14]  F. Mégraud,et al.  The seasonal distribution of campylobacter infection in nine European countries and New Zealand , 2002, Epidemiology and Infection.

[15]  Akke Vellinga,et al.  The Dioxin Crisis as Experiment To Determine Poultry-Related Campylobacter Enteritis , 2002, Emerging infectious diseases.

[16]  Xiao-Li Meng,et al.  POSTERIOR PREDICTIVE ASSESSMENT OF MODEL FITNESS VIA REALIZED DISCREPANCIES , 1996 .

[17]  Tine Hald,et al.  Attributing the human disease burden of foodborne infections to specific sources. , 2009, Foodborne pathogens and disease.

[18]  David Bock,et al.  A review and discussion of prospective statistical surveillance in public health , 2003 .

[19]  Rita R. Colwell,et al.  Temperature-Driven Campylobacter Seasonality in England and Wales , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[20]  Andrew Thomas,et al.  WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility , 2000, Stat. Comput..

[21]  Tapabrata Maiti,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis (2nd ed.) (Book) , 2004 .

[22]  Hanne Rosenquist,et al.  Quantitative risk assessment of human campylobacteriosis associated with thermophilic Campylobacter species in chickens. , 2003, International journal of food microbiology.

[23]  L. Rivers A Post‐Katrina Call to Action for the Risk Analysis Community , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[24]  A. Siitonen,et al.  Domestically Acquired Campylobacter Infections in Finland , 2004, Emerging infectious diseases.

[25]  Arie H Havelaar,et al.  Effectiveness and Efficiency of Controlling Campylobacter on Broiler Chicken Meat , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[26]  E. Gunnarsson,et al.  Campylobacter spp. in Icelandic poultry operations and human disease. , 2003, Epidemiology and infection.

[27]  J. Giesecke,et al.  Risk factors for domestic sporadic campylobacteriosis among young children in Sweden , 2005, Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases.