Evaluating the relationship between leaf chlorophyll concentration and SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter readings

Relationships between chlorophyll concentration ([chl]) and SPAD values were determined for birch, wheat, and potato. For all three species, the relationships were non-linear with an increasing slope with increasing SPAD. The relationships for birch and wheat were strong (r2 ∼ 0.9), while the potato relationship was comparatively weak (r2 ∼ 0.5). Birch and wheat had very similar relationships when the chlorophyll concentration was expressed per unit leaf area, but diverged when it was expressed per unit fresh weight. Furthermore, wheat showed similar SPAD–[chl] relationships for two different cultivars and during two different growing seasons. The curvilinear shape of the SPAD–[chl] relationships agreed well with the simulated effects of non-uniform chlorophyll distribution across the leaf surface and multiple scattering, causing deviations from linearity in the high and low SPAD range, respectively. The effect of non-uniformly distributed chlorophyll is likely to be more important in explaining the non-linearity in the empirical relationships, since the effect of scattering was predicted to be comparatively weak. The simulations were based on the algorithm for the calculation of SPAD-502 output values. We suggest that SPAD calibration curves should generally be parameterised as non-linear equations, and we hope that the relationships between [chl] and SPAD and the simulations of the present study can facilitate the interpretation of chlorophyll meter calibrations in relation to optical properties of leaves in future studies.

[1]  L. Gratani.  A non-destructive method to determine chlorophyll content of leaves , 1992 .

[2]  Thomas C. Vogelmann,et al.  PENETRATION OF LIGHT INTO PLANTS , 1989 .

[3]  G. Carter,et al.  Variability in leaf optical properties among 26 species from a broad range of habitats. , 1998, American journal of botany.

[4]  O. Monje,et al.  Inherent limitations of nondestructive chlorophyll meters: a comparison of two types of meters. , 1992, HortScience : a publication of the American Society for Horticultural Science.

[5]  H. Gausman,et al.  Plant Leaf Optical Properties in Visible and Near-Infrared Light , 1985 .

[6]  D. Arnon.  COPPER ENZYMES IN ISOLATED CHLOROPLASTS. POLYPHENOLOXIDASE IN BETA VULGARIS. , 1949, Plant physiology.

[7]  M. Bindi,et al.  Chlorophyll concentration of potatoes grown under elevated carbon dioxide and/or ozone concentrations , 2002 .

[8]  John L. Jifon,et al.  Growth Environment and Leaf Anatomy Affect Nondestructive Estimates of Chlorophyll and Nitrogen in Citrus sp. Leaves , 2005 .

[9]  H. Nguyen,et al.  Stay green trait in grain sorghum: relationship between visual rating and leaf chlorophyll concentration , 2000 .

[10]  Masahiko Saigusa,et al.  RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT IN LEAVES OF SORGHUM AND PIGEONPEA DETERMINED BY EXTRACTION METHOD AND BY CHLOROPHYLL METER (SPAD-502) , 2002 .

[11]  K. A. Stewart,et al.  RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN EXTRACTABLE CHLOROPHYLL AND SPAD VALUES IN MUSKMELON LEAVES , 2001 .

[12]  U. L. Yadawa,et al.  A Rapid and Nondestructive Method to Determine Chlorophyll in Intact Leaves , 1986, HortScience.

[13]  K. Solhaug,et al.  Effect of Irradiance on Chlorophyll Estimation with the Minolta SPAD-502 Leaf Chlorophyll Meter , 1998 .

[14]  H. Mohr,et al.  ABSORPTION SPECTRA OF LEAVES CORRECTED FOR SCATTERING and DISTRIBUTIONAL ERROR: A RADIATIVE TRANSFER and ABSORPTION STATISTICS TREATMENT , 1993 .

[15]  G. Fanizza,et al.  A non‐destructive determination of leaf chlorophyll in Vitis vinifera , 1991 .

[16]  Andrew D. Richardson,et al.  An evaluation of noninvasive methods to estimate foliar chlorophyll content , 2002 .

[17]  Leonid Fukshansky,et al.  Optics of a Bifacial Leaf: 2. Light Regime as Affected by the Leaf Structure and the Light Source , 1996 .

[18]  J. Markwell,et al.  Calibration of the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter , 2004, Photosynthesis Research.

[19]  Leonid Fukshansky,et al.  ON THE INTERPRETATION OF ABSORPTION SPECTRA OF LEAVES–I. INTRODUCTION and THE CORRECTION OF LEAF SPECTRA FOR SURFACE REFLECTION , 1990 .

[20]  H. Pleijel,et al.  Rate and duration of grain filling in relation to flag leaf senescence and grain yield in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) exposed to different concentrations of ozone , 2000 .

[21]  Donald M. Crothers,et al.  Physical Chemistry: with Applications to the Life Sciences , 1979 .

[22]  F. Castelli,et al.  Non-destructive determination of leaf chlorophyll content in four crop species , 1996 .

[23]  R. Marquard,et al.  Relationship Between Extractable Chlorophyll and an in Situ Method to Estimate Leaf Greenness , 1987, HortScience.

[24]  Jianjun Chen,et al.  Nondestructive and Rapid Estimation of Leaf Chlorophyll and Nitrogen Status of Peace Lily Using a Chlorophyll Meter , 2004 .

[25]  E. Chacko,et al.  Relation between extractable chlorophyll and portable chlorophyll meter readings in leaves of eight tropical and subtropical fruit-tree species , 1991 .

[26]  D. Martínez,et al.  Distortion of the SPAD 502 chlorophyll meter readings by changes in irradiance and leaf water status , 2004 .

[27]  R. J. Porra,et al.  Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy , 1989 .

[28]  G. Zervoudakis,et al.  Comparison of Chlorophyll Meter Readings with Leaf Chlorophyll Concentration in Amaranthus vlitus: Correlation with Physiological Processes1 , 2003, Russian Journal of Plant Physiology.

[29]  J. A. M. Filho,et al.  Assessment of Nitrogenized Nutrition of Citrus Rootstocks Using Chlorophyll Concentrations in the Leaf , 2003 .

[30]  Douglas G. Pfeiffer,et al.  Growing Conditions Alter the Relationship Between SPAD-501 Values and Apple Leaf Chlorophyll , 1990 .

[31]  Leonid Fukshansky,et al.  ON THE INTERPRETATION OF ABSORPTION SPECTRA OF LEAVES–II. THE NON‐ABSORBED RAY OF THE SIEVE EFFECT and THE MEAN OPTICAL PATHLENGTH IN THE REMAINDER OF THE LEAF , 1990 .

[32]  Matthijs Tollenaar,et al.  A nondestructive method to monitor leaf greenness in corn , 1991 .

[33]  José Luis García-Hernández,et al.  Relationship between a nondestructive and an extraction method for measuring chlorophyll contents in cowpea leaves , 2004 .

[34]  Thomas C. Vogelmann,et al.  Epidermal focussing and effects on light utilization in Oxalis acetosella , 1994 .