Comparing Learning in Virtual Reality with Learning on a 2D Screen Using Electrostatics Activities

Virtual Reality (VR) has the potential to overcome natural constraints and present things that would not be visible in the physical world. This makes the medium of VR a powerful tool for learning that allows users to become highly immersed in complex topics. In this paper, we compare a VR learning environment with a traditional 2D learning environment. To investigate the differences between VR and 2D learning environments, we designed two activities that help learners gain an intuitive understanding of concepts from electricity and magnetism. We performed an experiment comparing the learning that took place using these two variant. Although our quantitative learning measures did not reveal a significant difference between 2D and VR, VR was perceived by learners to have advantages. We did find significant quantitative differences in learners’ completion times. We share findings, based on the quantitative and qualitative feedback received, about what makes VR environments beneficial for learning about complex spatial topics, and propose corresponding design guidelines.

[1]  Martina A. Rau,et al.  Connection making between multiple graphical representations: A multi-methods approach for domain-specific grounding of an intelligent tutoring system for chemistry , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[2]  S. Ainsworth DeFT: A Conceptual Framework for Considering Learning with Multiple Representations. , 2006 .

[3]  Lisa Geraci,et al.  Superiority of variable to repeated practice in transfer on anagram solution , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Markus Funk,et al.  Investigating Social Presence and Communication with Embodied Avatars in Room-Scale Virtual Reality , 2017, iLRN.

[5]  Manolis Mavrikis,et al.  Design requirements, student perception indicators and validation metrics for intelligent exploratory learning environments , 2013, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[6]  Chris Dede,et al.  The Evolution of Constructivist Learning Environments : Immersion in Distributed , Virtual Worlds , 1995 .

[7]  S G Smith,et al.  Educational uses of the PLATO computer system. , 1976, Science.

[8]  T. Jong,et al.  Exploratory learning with a computer simulation for control theory: learning processes and instructional support , 1993 .

[9]  R. Kerr,et al.  Specific and Varied Practice of Motor Skill , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[10]  Lin Zhou,et al.  Enhancing learning through virtual reality and neurofeedback: a first step , 2017, LAK.

[11]  Robert J. Seidel,et al.  Virtual Reality Training's Future: Perspectives on Virtual Reality and Related Emerging Technologies , 1997 .

[12]  L.D. Thomas,et al.  Work in progress - implementation of Second Life in electromagnetic theory course , 2008, 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference.

[13]  Sandra G. Hart,et al.  Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later , 2006 .

[14]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Direct Manipulation: A Step Beyond Programming Languages , 1983, Computer.

[15]  C. Hmelo‐Silver,et al.  Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006) , 2007 .

[16]  Jim X. Chen,et al.  A Model for Understanding How Virtual Reality Aids Complex Conceptual Learning , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[17]  John M. Carroll,et al.  The adventure of getting to know a computer , 1982, Computer.

[18]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Heuristics for designing enjoyable user interfaces: Lessons from computer games , 1982, CHI '82.

[19]  Alan Miller,et al.  Augmented learning roads for Internet routing , 2014, 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings.

[20]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[21]  Robert M. Yadrick,et al.  Assessment of configurational knowledge of naturally- and artificially-acquired large-scale space , 1994 .

[22]  Marilyn C. Salzman,et al.  ScienceSpace: virtual realities for learning complex and abstract scientific concepts , 1996, Proceedings of the IEEE 1996 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium.

[23]  Maria Roussou,et al.  The virtual playground: an educational virtual reality environment for evaluating interactivity and conceptual learning , 2006, Virtual Reality.

[24]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Immersive Virtual Environments and the Classrooms of Tomorrow , 2015 .

[25]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  The benefits of immersion for spatial understanding of complex underground cave systems , 2007, VRST '07.

[26]  Veronica S. Pantelidis,et al.  Reasons to Use Virtual Reality in Education and Training Courses and a Model to Determine When to Use Virtual Reality. , 2010 .

[27]  Chris Dede,et al.  Immersive Interfaces for Engagement and Learning , 2009, Science.

[28]  Z. Zacharia,et al.  Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education , 2013, Science.

[29]  John Rieman,et al.  A field study of exploratory learning strategies , 1996, TCHI.

[30]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[31]  Wayne L. Shebilske,et al.  Virtual Reality: An Instructional Medium for Visual-Spatial Tasks. , 1992 .

[32]  Alan C. Kay A Personal Computer for Children of All Ages , 1972, ACM Annual Conference.