Bayesian approach for uncertainty quantification in water quality modelling: The influence of prior distribution

Summary Mathematical models are of common use in urban drainage, and they are increasingly being applied to support decisions about design and alternative management strategies. In this context, uncertainty analysis is of undoubted necessity in urban drainage modelling. However, despite the crucial role played by uncertainty quantification, several methodological aspects need to be clarified and deserve further investigation, especially in water quality modelling. One of them is related to the “a priori” hypotheses involved in the uncertainty analysis. Such hypotheses are usually condensed in “a priori” distributions assessing the most likely values for model parameters. This paper explores Bayesian uncertainty estimation methods investigating the influence of the choice of these prior distributions. The research aims at gaining insights in the selection of the prior distribution and the effect the user-defined choice has on the reliability of the uncertainty analysis results. To accomplish this, an urban stormwater quality model developed in previous studies has been employed. The model has been applied to the Fossolo catchment (Italy), for which both quantity and quality data were available. The results show that a uniform distribution should be applied whenever no information is available for specific parameters describing the case study. The use of weak information (mostly coming from literature or other model applications) should be avoided because it can lead to wrong estimations of uncertainty in modelling results. Model parameter related hypotheses would be better dropped in these cases.

[1]  Kjeld Schaarup-Jensen,et al.  Uncertainties Related to Extreme Event Statistics of Sewer System Surcharge and Overflow , 2005 .

[2]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Fiction and reality in the modelling world – Balance between simplicity and complexity, calibration and identifiability, verification and falsification , 1999 .

[3]  Quan J. Wang,et al.  Quantifying parameter uncertainty in stochastic models using the Box–Cox transformation , 2002 .

[4]  Valentina Krysanova,et al.  Implications of complexity and uncertainty for integrated modelling and impact assessment in river basins , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[5]  E. Ristenpart,et al.  Sediment properties and their changes in a sewer , 1995 .

[6]  Ghassan Chebbo,et al.  Application of MCMC-GSA model calibration method to urban runoff quality modeling , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[7]  John Doherty,et al.  Parameter interdependence and uncertainty induced by lumping in a hydrologic model , 2007 .

[8]  G Mannina,et al.  Integrated urban water modelling with uncertainty analysis. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[9]  George Kuczera,et al.  Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 2. Application , 2006 .

[10]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[11]  Poul Harremoës,et al.  Stochastic models for estimation of extreme pollution from urban runoff , 1988 .

[12]  Peter Reichert,et al.  On the usefulness of overparameterized ecological models , 1997 .

[13]  G. Viviani,et al.  An urban drainage stormwater quality model model development and uncertainty quantification , 2010 .

[14]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Tools to support a model-based methodology for emission/immission and benefit/cost/risk analysis of wastewater systems that considers uncertainty , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[15]  P. Mantovan,et al.  Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: Incoherence of the GLUE methodology , 2006 .

[16]  P. Willems Probabilistic immission modelling of receiving surface waters , 2000 .

[17]  K. Lindenschmidt,et al.  Structural uncertainty in a river water quality modelling system , 2007 .

[18]  Renzo Rosso,et al.  Applied Statistics for Civil and Environmental Engineers , 2008 .

[19]  P Willems,et al.  Probabilistic modelling of overflow, surcharge and flooding in urban drainage using the first-order reliability method and parameterization of local rain series. , 2008, Water research.

[20]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[21]  Søren Liedtke Thorndahl,et al.  Event based uncertainty assessment in urban drainage modelling applying the GLUE methodology , 2008 .

[22]  Patrick Willems,et al.  Parsimonious Model for Combined Sewer Overflow Pollution , 2004 .

[23]  P. Willems,et al.  Probabilistic emission and immission modelling: case-study of the combined sewer-WWTP-receiving water system at Dessel (Belgium). , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[24]  R. F. Scott,et al.  Expansion and Upgrading of Columbus, OH WWTPs to Advanced Wastewater Treatment , 1992 .

[25]  T. Bayes An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances , 2003 .

[26]  P. Willems Quantification and relative comparison of different types of uncertainties in sewer water quality modeling. , 2008, Water research.

[27]  T. M. Parchure,et al.  Erosion of soft cohesive sediment deposits , 1985 .

[28]  Peter Reichert On the necessity of using imprecise probabilities for modelling environmental systems , 1997 .

[29]  James E. Campbell,et al.  An Approach to Sensitivity Analysis of Computer Models: Part I—Introduction, Input Variable Selection and Preliminary Variable Assessment , 1981 .

[30]  Gabriele Freni,et al.  Identifiability analysis for receiving water body quality modelling , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[31]  M. B. Beck,et al.  Water quality modeling: A review of the analysis of uncertainty , 1987 .

[32]  Adrian J. Saul,et al.  Erosion of Sediment Beds in Sewers: Model Development , 1999 .

[33]  Sylvie Barraud,et al.  Uncertainties, performance indicators and decision aid applied to stormwater facilities , 2002 .

[34]  D. Chin Predictive uncertainty in water-quality modeling. , 2009 .

[35]  G Chebbo,et al.  Bayesian analysis for erosion modelling of sediments in combined sewer systems. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[36]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations Revisited, Rebutted , 1982 .

[37]  Bernd Klauer,et al.  Harmonised techniques and representative river basin data for assessment and use of uncertainty information in integrated water management (HarmoniRiB) , 2005 .

[38]  B. Bates,et al.  A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Scheme for parameter estimation and inference in conceptual rainfall‐runoff modeling , 2001 .

[39]  G. Freni,et al.  Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: the effect of acceptability threshold in the GLUE methodology. , 2008, Water research.

[40]  George Kuczera,et al.  Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: the Metropolis algorithm , 1998 .

[41]  Edwin T. Jaynes,et al.  Prior Probabilities , 1968, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning.

[42]  Gabriele Freni,et al.  Assessment of data availability influence on integrated urban drainage modelling uncertainty , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[43]  Gabriele Freni,et al.  Urban runoff modelling uncertainty: Comparison among Bayesian and pseudo-Bayesian methods , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[44]  Jing Yang,et al.  Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe Basin in China , 2008 .

[45]  George Kuczera,et al.  Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 1. Theory , 2006 .