The Lo cus of Context Effec ts on Product Proximity Judgments

Abstract Tversky's (Tversky, A., 1977. Features of similarity. Psychological Review 84, 327–352) contrast model of similarity is used to examine the locus of two contextual effects on product judgments. More familiar stimuli may be perceived as more similar as well as more dissimilar than less familiar stimuli. Priming subjects' product knowledge should, meanwhile, increase the similarity of brands but decrease the similarity of categories. We argue that both of these context effects should be more prominent among the moderately proximal stimuli in any given set. Two studies, one examining the similarity/dissimilarity effect and one examining priming effects, support this conclusion. The observed priming effects were also stronger for brands than for categories. Overall these context effects appear more localized than previously assumed.

[1]  Noreen M. Klein,et al.  An Investigation of Utility-Directed Cutoff Selection , 1987 .

[2]  E. Rosch,et al.  Cognition and Categorization , 1980 .

[3]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Multiattribute Approaches for Product Concept Evaluation and Generation: A Critical Review , 1979 .

[4]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Basic-level superiority in picture categorization , 1982 .

[5]  Arno J. Rethans,et al.  The Impact of Comparative Advertising on Perception Formation in New Product Introductions , 1986 .

[6]  Lee G. Cooper.  A Review of Multidimensional Scaling in Marketing Research , 1983 .

[7]  J. Howard.  Consumer behavior : application of theory / John A. Howard , 1977 .

[8]  Donald R. Lehmann,et al.  Attribute abstraction, feature-dimensionality, and the scaling of product similarities , 1992 .

[9]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Determining the competitive structure of product-markets : practices, issues, and suggestions , 1990 .

[10]  John W. Payne,et al.  Effort and Accuracy in Choice , 1985 .

[11]  J. Jacoby,et al.  Information Acquisition Behavior in Brand Choice Situations , 1977 .

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  Weighting common and distinctive features in perceptual and conceptual judgments , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  J. Bettman,et al.  Effects of Framing on Evaluation of Comparable and Noncomparable Alternatives by Expert and Novice Consumers , 1987 .

[14]  Gregory L. Murphy,et al.  Cue validity and levels of categorization. , 1982 .

[15]  A. Tversky.  Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[16]  R. Olshavsky,et al.  Task Complexity and Contingent Processing in Brand Choice , 1979 .

[17]  Ajay K. Manrai,et al.  Tscale: A new multidimensional scaling procedure based on tversky's contrast model , 1992 .

[18]  Donald R. Lehmann,et al.  The effects of fatigue on judgments of interproduct similarity , 1990 .

[19]  Naresh K. Malhotra.  On “the effects of fatigue on judgments of interproduct similarity” , 1990 .

[20]  Donald R. Lehmann,et al.  Alternative explanations for changes in similarity judgments and MDS structure , 1990 .

[21]  Charlotte H. Mason,et al.  The Role of Tangible and Intangible Attributes in Similarity and Preference Judgments , 1990 .

[22]  Michael E. Johnson.  Context Effects in Product Perception , 1981 .

[23]  Kevin Lane Keller.  Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity , 1993 .

[24]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Similarity Involving Attributes and Relations: Judgments of Similarity and Difference Are Not Inverses , 1990 .

[25]  J. Hauser.  Agendas and Consumer Choice , 1986 .

[26]  A. Tversky,et al.  Similarity, separability, and the triangle inequality. , 1982, Psychological review.

[27]  B. Loken,et al.  Alternative Approaches to Understanding the Determinants of Typicality , 1990 .

[28]  D. Medin,et al.  The role of theories in conceptual coherence. , 1985, Psychological review.

[29]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Dimensions of Consumer Expertise , 1987 .

[30]  H. Wold.  Theoretical empiricism : a general rationale for scientific model-building , 1989 .

[31]  D. A. Horne,et al.  The Contrast Model of Similarity and Comparative Advertising , 1988 .

[32]  E. Rosch.  Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .

[33]  William B Estes,et al.  Similarity , Frequency , and Category Representations , 1988 .

[34]  B. Kahn,et al.  The Influence of External Constraints on Brand Choice: The Lone-Alternative Effect , 1991 .

[35]  L. Barsalou.  Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  Michael D. Johnson.  Comparability and Hierarchical Processing in Multialternative Choice , 1988 .

[37]  Amos Tversky,et al.  Studies of similarity , 1978 .

[38]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Ad hoc categories , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[39]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[40]  M. Brucks.  The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior , 1985 .

[41]  Michael D. Johnson.  Consumer Similarity Judgments: A Test of the Contrast Model , 1986 .

[42]  Terry Elrod,et al.  Choice Map: Inferring a Product-Market Map from Panel Data , 1988 .

[43]  Charles B. Weinberg,et al.  The Impact of Comparative Advertising on Perception and Attitude: Some Positive Findings , 1984 .

[44]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions , 1990 .