Limitations of response thresholds models of division of labor

High levels of cooperation are often cited as the primary reasons for the ecological success of social insects. In social insects, workers perform a multitude of tasks such as foraging, nest construction and brood rearing without central control of how work is allocated among individuals. It has been suggested that workers choose a task by responding to stimuli gathered from the environment. Response threshold models assume that individuals in a colony vary in the stimulus intensity (response threshold) at which they begin to perform the corresponding task. In a recent paper, we investigated the limitations of the models of division of labor that base on the response thresholds. This abstract is meant to convey a brief summary of the points we raised in that study.

[1]  R. Matthews,et al.  Ants. , 1898, Science.

[2]  Caste and ecology in the social insects , 1979 .

[3]  G. Robinson.  Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. , 1992, Annual review of entomology.

[4]  E. Bonabeau,et al.  Quantitative study of the fixed threshold model for the regulation of division of labour in insect societies , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  D. Gordon.  The organization of work in social insect colonies , 1996, Nature.

[6]  Sandra D. Mitchell,et al.  Self-organization and the evolution of division of labor , 1998 .

[7]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[8]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Dynamic Scheduling and Division of Labor in Social Insects , 2000, Adapt. Behav..

[9]  G. Theraulaz,et al.  Inspiration for optimization from social insect behaviour , 2000, Nature.

[10]  J. Fewell,et al.  Models of division of labor in social insects. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.

[11]  J. Fewell,et al.  Colony response to graded resource changes: an analytical model of the influence of genotype, environment, and dominance. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[12]  S. Graham,et al.  Modelling the role of intracolonial genetic diversity on regulation of brood temperature in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies , 2006, Insectes Sociaux.

[13]  D. Floreano,et al.  Evolutionary Conditions for the Emergence of Communication in Robots , 2007, Current Biology.

[14]  Raphaël Jeanson,et al.  Emergence of increased division of labor as a function of group size , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[15]  Dario Floreano,et al.  Genetic Team Composition and Level of Selection in the Evolution of Cooperation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[16]  D. Floreano,et al.  Task-dependent influence of genetic architecture and mating frequency on division of labour in social insect societies , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[17]  D. Floreano,et al.  Evolution of Adaptive Behaviour in Robots by Means of Darwinian Selection , 2010, PLoS biology.

[18]  Dario Floreano,et al.  Neural Networks as Mechanisms to Regulate Division of Labor , 2012, The American Naturalist.