Beyond deconstruction. a reconstructive perspective on sustainability transition governance

This paper reviews criticisms of sustainability transition studies, using transition management (TM) as a case study. While these criticisms have yielded theoretical progress, underlying epistemological issues remain. Contrasting the TM approach to complexity with other more deconstructive views on complexity, it becomes clear that some criticisms on TM are inherently based on a deconstructive questioning of whether complex systems can be influenced into a desired direction. The authors build on those critiques to argue that TM needs to clarify how (1) TM itself harbours deconstructive power (hitherto insufficiently specified), while (2) at the same time having an explicit ambition to ‘go beyond’ deconstruction. To that end, this paper proposes a ‘reconstructive approach’ as an epistemological grounding for transition studies. This reconstructive approach is elaborated on three grounds: (1) a research focus beyond ‘is’ versus ‘ought’ towards ‘can be’, (2) interpretative research and reflexivity, and (3) a ‘phronetic’ understanding of sustainability.

[1]  J. Meadowcroft.  What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions , 2009 .

[2]  J. Rotmans,et al.  The practice of transition management: Examples and lessons from four distinct cases , 2010 .

[3]  J. Grin,et al.  Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change , 2010 .

[4]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[5]  N. Schäpke,et al.  Action, research and participation: roles of researchers in sustainability transitions , 2014, Sustainability Science.

[6]  John Grin,et al.  Contextualizing Reflexive Governance: the Politics of Dutch Transitions to Sustainability , 2007 .

[7]  Mustafa Emirbayer,et al.  What Is Agency?1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges , 2010 .

[9]  William C. Clark,et al.  Public Participation in Sustainability Science: Frontmatter , 2003 .

[10]  D. Loorbach.  Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework , 2010 .

[11]  J. Hoffman.  Theorizing power in transition studies: the role of creativity and novel practices in structural change , 2013 .

[12]  Peregrine Schwartz-Shea.  Judging Quality Evaluative Criteria and Epistemic Communities , 2015 .

[13]  Niki Frantzeskaki,et al.  Governing societal transitions to sustainability , 2012 .

[14]  John H. Holland,et al.  Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity , 1995 .

[15]  A. Loeber.  Designing for Phronèsis: Experiences with transformative learning on sustainable development , 2007 .

[16]  Paul Cilliers,et al.  Complexity, Deconstruction and Relativism , 2005 .

[17]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  Patterns in transitions: Understanding complex chains of change , 2011 .

[18]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Designing long-term policy: rethinking transition management , 2009 .

[19]  Hannah Arendt,et al.  Between Past and Future , 1961 .

[20]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life , 2010 .

[21]  C. Hendriks,et al.  Policy design without democracy? Making democratic sense of transition management , 2009 .

[22]  David Marsh,et al.  A Skin Not a Sweater: Ontology and Epistemology in Political Science , 2010 .

[23]  Christopher Pollitt,et al.  The Essential Public Manager , 2003 .

[24]  Deconstruction as Narrative Interruption , 2007 .

[25]  David Weitzner,et al.  Deconstruction Revisited , 2007 .

[26]  Erik Paredis.  A winding road: transition management, policy change and the search for sustainable development , 2013 .

[27]  E. Shove,et al.  Caution! Transitions Ahead: Politics, Practice, and Sustainable Transition Management , 2007 .

[28]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[29]  Frank Fischer,et al.  Politics, Values, and Public Policy: The Problem of Methodology. , 1981 .

[30]  D. Loorbach.  Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development , 2007 .

[31]  Graham Room,et al.  Complexity, Institutions and Public Policy , 2011 .

[32]  Flor Avelino,et al.  Power in Transition: Empowering Discourses on Sustainability Transitions , 2006 .

[33]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The transitions storyline in Dutch environmental policy , 2009 .

[34]  John Grin.  Reflexive Modernisation as a Governance Issue, Or: Designing and Shaping Re-structuration , 2006 .

[35]  Johan Schot,et al.  The usefulness of evolutionary models for explaining innovation. The case of the Netherlands in the nineteenth century , 1998 .

[36]  Roger Strand,et al.  Complexity, Ideology, and Governance , 2002 .

[37]  B. Flyvbjerg.  Phronetic planning research: theoretical and methodological reflections , 2004 .

[38]  Bonno Pel.  System Innovation as Synchronization: innovation atempts in the Dutch traffic management field , 2012 .

[39]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again , 2001 .

[40]  Frank Fischer,et al.  Evaluating Public Policy , 1995 .

[41]  Martijn Duineveld,et al.  The difference between knowing the path and walking the path : een essay over het terugkerend maakbaarheidsdenken in beleidsonderzoek , 2007 .

[42]  Tjerk Jan Schuitmaker,et al.  Identifying and unravelling persistent problems , 2012 .

[43]  S. Cummings,et al.  Foucault Plays Habermas: An Alternative Philosophical Underpinning for Critical Systems Thinking , 1996 .

[44]  R. Kemp,et al.  Transitioning policy: co-production of a new strategic framework for energy innovation policy in the Netherlands , 2009 .

[45]  F. Kern.  Ideas, Institutions, and Interests: Explaining Policy Divergence in Fostering ‘System Innovations’ towards Sustainability , 2011 .

[46]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Social-ecological resilience and socio-technical transitions: critical issues for sustainability governance , 2008 .

[47]  Arie Rip,et al.  Constructing Transition Paths Through the Management of Niches , 2001 .

[48]  E. Lorenz.  Atmospheric Predictability as Revealed by Naturally Occurring Analogues , 1969 .

[49]  Jens Newig,et al.  Steering for Sustainable Development: a Typology of Problems and Strategies with respect to Ambivalence, Uncertainty and Distributed Power , 2007 .

[50]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Pluralising progress: From integrative transitions to transformative diversity , 2011 .

[51]  F. Fischer,et al.  16 Deliberative Policy Analysis as Practical Reason: Integrating Empirical and Normative Arguments , 2007 .

[52]  Michael Howlett,et al.  Implementing transition management as policy reforms: a case study of the Dutch energy sector , 2009 .

[53]  Flor Avelino,et al.  Empowerment and the challenge of applying transition management to ongoing projects , 2009 .

[54]  J. Voss,et al.  Reflexive governance for sustainable development , 2006 .

[55]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Transition Management™ and the Politics of Shape Shifting , 2008 .

[56]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[57]  Mary Uhl-Bien,et al.  Complexity Theory and Al-Qaeda: Examining Complex Leadership , 2003 .