Distribution of Prostrate Cancer for Optimized Biopsy Protocols

Prostate cancer is the leading cause of death for American men. The gold standard for diagnosis of prostate cancer is transrectal ultrasound-guided needle core biopsy. Unfortunately, no imaging modality, including ultrasound, can effectively differentiate prostate cancer from normal tissues. As a result, most current prostate needle biopsy procedures have to be performed under empiric protocols, leading to unsatisfactory detection rate. The goal of this research is to establish an accurate 3D distribution map of prostate cancer and develop optimized biopsy protocols. First, we used real prostate specimens with localized cancer to reconstruct 3D prostate models. We then divided each model into zones based on clinical conventions, and calculate cancer presence in each zone. As a result, an accurate 3D prostate cancer distribution map was developed using 281 prostate models. Finally, the linear programming approach was used to optimize biopsy protocols using anatomy and symmetry constraints, and the optimized protocols were developed with various criteria.

[1]  M. Terris,et al.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[2]  David G. Luenberger,et al.  Linear and nonlinear programming , 1984 .

[3]  D L McCullough,et al.  Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[4]  M W Kattan,et al.  Distinguishing clinically important from unimportant prostate cancers before treatment: value of systematic biopsies. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[5]  C Busch,et al.  Three-dimensional computer reconstruction of prostate cancer from radical prostatectomy specimens: evaluation of the model by core biopsy simulation. , 1999, Urology.

[6]  Matthew T. Freedman,et al.  Optimizing prostate needle biopsy through 3D simulation , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[7]  Jianhua Xuan,et al.  Surface reconstruction and visualization of the surgical prostate model , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[8]  William J. Cook,et al.  Combinatorial optimization , 1997 .

[9]  S K Mun,et al.  Three-dimensional computer-simulated prostate models: lateral prostate biopsies increase the detection rate of prostate cancer. , 1999, Urology.

[10]  G. D. Taylor,et al.  Computer simulation of the probability of detecting low volume carcinoma of the prostate with six random systematic core biopsies. , 1995, Urology.

[11]  C T Chen,et al.  Dynamic elastic interpolation for 3D medical image reconstruction from serial cross sections. , 1988, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.