Dynamic Multi-criteria Classifier Selection for Illegal Tapping Detection in Oil Pipelines

Illegal tapping of fuel pipelines has recently become one of the most relevant safety problems faced by the industry. Hundreds of illegal interventions have been reported around the world, causing a significant number of deaths, relevant impacts on the environment, and capital loss. Therefore, it is important to develop systems that are able to detect such scenarios at an early stage, enabling a fast counteract. To this end, machine learning algorithms can train models on available data for detecting future issues. Most recently, ensemble learning and dynamic classifier selection (DCS) techniques have been achieving promising results in supervised learning tasks. Such models are usually trained based on a single criterion. However, it is desirable to take into account both the number of false positives (FP) and false negatives (FN) for the illegal tapping detection task, since they are conflicting and both lead to financial losses and/or accidents. Therefore, this work proposes a novel DCS technique based on multiple criteria, namely overall local class-specific accuracy (OLCA), which employs multi-criteria decision making for dynamically selecting the best classifier for a new sample given the local true positive and negative ratios. A numerical experiment is conducted for assessing the generalization performance of the proposed method in an oil pipeline, with the goal of detecting illegal taping using pressure transient signals. Results show that OLCA is able to reduce the number of both FP and FN when dynamically selecting the classifiers of a baseline Random Forest ensemble.

[1]  Kate J. Bowers,et al.  Spatial and temporal analysis of crude oil theft in the Niger delta , 2018 .

[2]  Zhihong Qian,et al.  A novel location algorithm for pipeline leakage based on the attenuation of negative pressure wave , 2019, Process Safety and Environmental Protection.

[3]  George D. C. Cavalcanti,et al.  META-DES: A dynamic ensemble selection framework using meta-learning , 2015, Pattern Recognit..

[4]  Reza Baradaran Kazemzadeh,et al.  PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Anne M. P. Canuto,et al.  Empirical comparison of Dynamic Classifier Selection methods based on diversity and accuracy for building ensembles , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence).

[6]  George D. C. Cavalcanti,et al.  Dynamic classifier selection: Recent advances and perspectives , 2018, Inf. Fusion.

[7]  Luiz Eduardo Soares de Oliveira,et al.  Contribution of data complexity features on dynamic classifier selection , 2016, 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[8]  Zhirong Wang,et al.  Effect of rubber washers on leak location for assembled pressurized liquid pipeline based on negative pressure wave method , 2018, Process Safety and Environmental Protection.

[9]  Yoav Freund,et al.  A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting , 1995, EuroCOLT.

[10]  B. Roy Paradigms and Challenges , 2005 .

[11]  Anne M. P. Canuto,et al.  Using Accuracy and Diversity to Select Classifiers to Build Ensembles , 2006, The 2006 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network Proceedings.

[12]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[13]  Gilberto Reynoso-Meza,et al.  A holistic multi-objective optimization design procedure for ensemble member generation and selection , 2019, Appl. Soft Comput..

[14]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS: THE PROMETHEE METHOD , 1986 .

[15]  Anna Jankowska,et al.  Early detection and prediction of leaks in fluidized-bed boilers using artificial neural networks , 2015 .

[16]  Mohamed Medhat Gaber,et al.  Random forests: from early developments to recent advancements , 2014 .

[17]  Luiz Eduardo Soares de Oliveira,et al.  Dynamic selection of classifiers - A comprehensive review , 2014, Pattern Recognit..

[18]  Guoxi He,et al.  A framework of smart pipeline system and its application on multiproduct pipeline leakage handling , 2019 .

[19]  Jinhai Liu,et al.  A leak detection method for oil pipeline based on markov feature and two-stage decision scheme , 2019, Measurement.

[20]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[21]  Resul Kara,et al.  Leakage detection and localization on water transportation pipelines: a multi-label classification approach , 2017, Neural Computing and Applications.

[22]  Olga Sourina,et al.  Real-time EEG-based emotion monitoring using stable features , 2015, The Visual Computer.

[23]  Kevin W. Bowyer,et al.  Combination of multiple classifiers using local accuracy estimates , 1996, Proceedings CVPR IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[24]  Xiaodong Xu,et al.  Long range pipeline leak detection and localization using discrete observer and support vector machine , 2019, AIChE Journal.

[25]  Mahdi Eftekhari,et al.  Dynamic ensemble selection based on hesitant fuzzy multiple criteria decision making , 2020, Soft Comput..

[26]  R. Ramadevi,et al.  Leak Detection Methods—A Technical Review , 2018, ICC 2018.

[27]  Jian Li,et al.  A Small Leak Detection Method Based on VMD Adaptive De-Noising and Ambiguity Correlation Classification Intended for Natural Gas Pipelines , 2016, Sensors.

[28]  Alireza Yazdizadeh,et al.  Leakage detection in a gas pipeline using artificial neural networks based on wireless sensor network and Internet of Things , 2017, 2017 IEEE 15th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN).

[29]  Karim Salahshoor,et al.  Pipeline leakage detection and isolation: An integrated approach of statistical and wavelet feature extraction with multi-layer perceptron neural network (MLPNN) , 2016 .

[30]  Marian Dudek,et al.  Liquid Leak Detection Focused On Theft Protection , 2005 .

[31]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[32]  Lior Rokach,et al.  Ensemble learning: A survey , 2018, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..