Private payer reimbursement for telemedicine services in the United States.

Telemedicine has garnered significant attention over the past decade as a solution to cost and access challenges facing healthcare. Yet, utilization rates have not reached their full potential. One major barrier to the adoption of telemedicine cited in the literature is the lack of universal reimbursement from private payers. The purpose of this investigation was to capture a current picture of private reimbursement for telemedicine services in the United States. This investigation was a follow-up to a 2003 survey conducted by the American Telemedicine Association (ATA) and AMD Telemedicine. Representatives from 116 telemedicine programs were contacted between September and November 2005 via telephone and/or e-mail to participate in this survey. Of those contacted, we received responses from 64 organizations, a 55% response rate. To provide answers to our research questions, descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. Data indicate that the United States is progressing toward expanded private reimbursement for telemedicine services with 58% of responding organizations who provide potentially billable telemedicine services receiving private reimbursement (up 5% from 2003). In addition, it was found that 81% of those who receive private pay reported no differences between reimbursement for telemedicine services as compared to traditional faceto-face consults. Finally, of those who receive private pay, data indicated that telemedicine programs are submitting on average approximately 40% of consults for private reimbursement. While this investigation does suggest that we are making small improvements in private payer reimbursement, the change appears to lag behind a pace needed to optimize telemedicine deployment.

[1]  E. Selvin,et al.  Licensing telemedicine: the need for a national system. , 2000, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[2]  Pamela Whitten,et al.  Telemedicine from the Payor Perspective , 2003 .

[3]  Vivian L. West,et al.  Patient Satisfaction with Telemedicine , 2000 .

[4]  Katherine D. Seelman,et al.  Telerehabilitation: Policy Issues and Research Tools , 2009, International journal of telerehabilitation.

[5]  Carmen DeNavas-Walt,et al.  Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2004 , 2006 .

[6]  R M Angus,et al.  The role of telecare in the management of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the home , 1999, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[7]  D. Makuc,et al.  Health, United States, 2003; with chartbook on trends in the health of Americans , 2003 .

[8]  Joseph Finkelstein,et al.  Home Automated Telemanagement (HAT) System to Facilitate Self-Care of Patients with Chronic Diseases , 2003 .

[9]  B. Dunn,et al.  Telepathology networking in VISN-12 of the Veterans Health Administration. , 2000, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[10]  Simonetta Scalvini,et al.  A pilot study of nurse-led, home-based telecardiology for patients with chronic heart failure , 2004, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[11]  P. Whitten,et al.  Addressing telehealth's foremost barrier: Provider as initial gatekeeper , 2005, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[12]  John A. H. Lee Health: United States , 1986 .

[13]  Robert Kevin Grigsby,et al.  Sickle cell telemedicine and standard clinical encounters: a comparison of patient satisfaction. , 1999, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.