Correlation between transcriptome and interactome mapping data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genomic and proteomic approaches can provide hypotheses concerning function for the large number of genes predicted from genome sequences. Because of the artificial nature of the assays, however, the information from these high-throughput approaches should be considered with caution. Although it is possible that more meaningful hypotheses could be formulated by integrating the data from various functional genomic and proteomic projects, it has yet to be seen to what extent the data can be correlated and how such integration can be achieved. We developed a 'transcriptome–interactome correlation mapping' strategy to compare the interactions between proteins encoded by genes that belong to common expression-profiling clusters with those between proteins encoded by genes that belong to different clusters. Using this strategy with currently available data sets for Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we provide the first global evidence that genes with similar expression profiles are more likely to encode interacting proteins. We show how this correlation between transcriptome and interactome data can be used to improve the quality of hypotheses based on the information from both approaches. The strategy described here may help to integrate other functional genomic and proteomic data, both in yeast and in higher organisms.

[1]  John A. Hartigan,et al.  Clustering Algorithms , 1975 .

[2]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  A genome-wide transcriptional analysis of the mitotic cell cycle. , 1998, Molecular cell.

[3]  M. Werner-Washburne,et al.  The Highly Conserved, Coregulated SNOand SNZ Gene Families in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeRespond to Nutrient Limitation , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[4]  James I. Garrels,et al.  The Yeast Proteome Database (YPD): a model for the organization and presentation of genome-wide functional data , 1999, Nucleic Acids Res..

[5]  Dmitrij Frishman,et al.  MIPS: a database for genomes and protein sequences , 1999, Nucleic Acids Res..

[6]  G. Church,et al.  Systematic determination of genetic network architecture , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[7]  D. Botstein,et al.  Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  James R. Knight,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Nature.

[9]  E. Winzeler,et al.  Genomics, gene expression and DNA arrays , 2000, Nature.

[10]  M. Mann,et al.  Proteomics to study genes and genomes , 2000, Nature.

[11]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  The core meiotic transcriptome in budding yeasts , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[12]  T. Ito,et al.  Toward a protein-protein interaction map of the budding yeast: A comprehensive system to examine two-hybrid interactions in all possible combinations between the yeast proteins. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  George M. Church,et al.  Regulatory Networks Revealed by Transcriptional Profiling of Damaged Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cells: Rpn4 Links Base Excision Repair with Proteasomes , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[14]  M. Vidal A Biological Atlas of Functional Maps , 2001, Cell.

[15]  M. Vidal,et al.  Protein interaction maps for model organisms , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[16]  M. Snyder,et al.  Emerging technologies in yeast genomics , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[17]  P. Sternberg,et al.  Working in the Post-Genomic C. elegans World , 2001, Cell.

[18]  R. Ozawa,et al.  A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Dmitrij Frishman,et al.  MIPS: a database for genomes and protein sequences , 1999, Nucleic Acids Res..