Major accident management in the process industry: An expert tool called CESMA for intelligent allocation of prevention investments

Abstract A tool (called CESMA) was developed to carry out cost–benefit analyses and cost-effectiveness analyses of prevention investments for avoiding major accidents. A wide variety of parameters necessary to calculate both the costs of the considered preventive measures and the benefits related with the avoidance of accidents were identified in the research. The benefits are determined by estimating the difference in (hypothetical) major accident costs without and with the implementation of a preventive measure. As many relevant costs and benefits as possible were included into the tool, based on literature and expert opinion, in order to be able to deliver an all-embracing cost–benefit analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis to assist in the investment decision process. Because major accidents are related to extremely low frequencies, the tool takes the uncertainty of the unwanted occurrence of a major accident into account through the usage of a so-called ‘disproportion factor’. Compared with existing software, the CESMA tool is innovative by striving for an as-accurate-as-possible picture of costs and benefits of major accident prevention, and taking the uncertainties accompanying disastrous events into consideration. Furthermore, an illustrative example of CESMA is presented in the paper.

[1]  Kenneth Sörensen,et al.  An Approach for Optimal Allocation of Safety Resources: Using the Knapsack Problem to Take Aggregated Cost‐Efficient Preventive Measures , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  Maurice Oxenburgh,et al.  The productivity assessment tool: computer-based cost benefit analysis model for the economic assessment of occupational health and safety interventions in the workplace. , 2005, Journal of safety research.

[3]  Arieh Gavious,et al.  The costs of industrial accidents for the organization: Developing methods and tools for evaluation and cost–benefit analysis of investment in safety , 2009 .

[4]  Nicolas Dechy,et al.  Lessons Learned from Toulouse and Buncefield Disasters: From Risk Analysis Failures to the Identification of Atypical Scenarios Through a Better Knowledge Management , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  Joanne B Linhard Understanding the return on health, safety and environmental investments. , 2005, Journal of safety research.

[6]  Harry F. Campbell,et al.  Benefit-Cost Analysis , 2001 .

[7]  Ben J. M. Ale,et al.  Modeling the major accident prevention legislation change process within Europe , 2011 .

[8]  Monica Bergström The potential-method--an economic evaluation tool. , 2005, Journal of safety research.

[9]  Rafael Amador-Rodezno An overview to CERSSO's self evaluation of the cost-benefit on the investment in occupational safety and health in the textile factories: "a step by step methodology". , 2005, Journal of safety research.