Self-Assessment, Self-Enhancement, and the Choice of Comparison Organizations for Evaluating Organizational Performance

Abstract We examine the influence of the self-assessment and self-enhancement motives on the choice of comparison organizations in two experimental studies. Study 1 shows that: (1) self-assessment generally prevailed over self-enhancement, guiding decision makers to choose organizations that were more similar and had better performance; (2) self-enhancement was more pronounced under conditions of low performance, leading participants to more frequently choose organizations that were less similar and had lower performance; and (3) self-enhancing comparisons inhibited perceptions of failure and the propensity to make changes. Study 2 extends the results of Study 1 by showing that participants were more likely to choose comparison organizations that had lower performance and were less similar when they were in a self-enhancement mindset than when they were in a self-assessment mindset. The combined effects of self-assessment and self-enhancement on the choice of comparison organizations are discussed in relation to the broader organizational literature on learning from performance feedback.

[1]  Jerry Suls,et al.  A Selective History of Classic and Neo-Social Comparison Theory , 2000 .

[2]  J. Ruiz Moreno.  [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[3]  H. Greve.  Performance, Aspirations, and Risky Organizational Change , 1998 .

[4]  Pino G. Audia,et al.  Self-Enhancement and Learning from Performance Feedback , 2012 .

[5]  R. Bettis,et al.  Adaptive Aspirations and Performance Heterogeneity: Attention Allocation Among Multiple Reference Points , 2015 .

[6]  J. V. Wood,et al.  Social comparison in adjustment to breast cancer. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Members' Responses to Organizational Identity Threats: Encountering and Countering the Business Week Rankings , 1996 .

[8]  Goce Andrevski,et al.  Striving toward the future: aspiration—performance discrepancies and planned organizational change , 2009 .

[9]  H. Thomas,et al.  Attitudes Toward Risk and The Risk–Return Paradox: Prospect Theory Explanations , 1988 .

[10]  Pino G. Audia,et al.  Less Likely to Fail: Low Performance, Firm Size, and Factory Expansion in the Shipbuilding Industry , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[11]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Pluralistic Ignorance in Corporate Boards and Firms' Strategic Persistence in Response to Low Firm Performance , 2005 .

[12]  D. R. Lehman,et al.  Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? , 1999, Psychological review.

[13]  G. Āllport.  Personality: A Psychological Interpretation , 1938 .

[14]  F. Gibbons,et al.  Comparison-level preferences after performance: is downward comparison theory still useful? , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  T. Kwang,et al.  Do People Embrace Praise Even When They Feel Unworthy? A Review of Critical Tests of Self-Enhancement Versus Self-Verification , 2010, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[16]  Mark Bergen,et al.  Scanning Dynamic Competitive Landscapes: A Market-based and Resource-based Framework , 2003 .

[17]  Vinit M. Desai,et al.  Constrained Growth: How Experience, Legitimacy, and Age Influence Risk Taking in Organizations , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[18]  Timothy G. Pollock,et al.  Industry Categories and the Politics of the Comparable Firm in CEO Compensation , 1999 .

[19]  S. A. Schwinghammer,et al.  DEFENSIVE SOCIAL COMPARISONS AND THE CONSTRAINTS OF REALITY , 2004 .

[20]  H. Greve.  A Behavioral Theory of R&D Expenditures and Innovations: Evidence from Shipbuilding , 2003 .

[21]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  Social comparison processes in an organizational context: New directions , 2007 .

[22]  Carol T. Kulik,et al.  Relations between job facet comparisons and employee reactions , 1986 .

[23]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of Firm Growth: Sequential Attention to Size and Performance Goals , 2008 .

[24]  Bradley R. Staats,et al.  Learning from My Success and from Others' Failure: Evidence from Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[25]  M. Ross,et al.  The frequency of temporal-self and social comparisons in people's personal appraisals. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  E. Diener,et al.  Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  A. Bandura,et al.  Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. , 1991 .

[28]  D. Oyserman,et al.  Thinking about the self influences thinking in general: cognitive consequences of salient self-concept , 2002 .

[29]  N. Rajagopalan,et al.  The Influence of Acquisition Experience and Performance on Acquisition Behavior: Evidence From the U.S. Commercial Banking Industry , 2006 .

[30]  T. Wills.  Downward Comparison Principles in Social Psychology , 1981 .

[31]  S. E. Taylor,et al.  Effects of social comparison direction, threat, and self-esteem on affect, self-evaluation, and expected success. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[33]  P. Tetlock.  Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. , 1985 .

[34]  Virginia S Y Kwan,et al.  Conceptualizing and assessing self-enhancement bias: a componential approach. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  Christine M. Beckman,et al.  Disentangling Risk and Change , 2015 .

[36]  M. Alicke.  Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. , 1985 .

[37]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  Joseph Lampel,et al.  Keeping both eyes on the competition: Strategic adjustment to multiple targets in the UK mobile phone industry , 2010 .

[39]  Pino G. Audia,et al.  Reluctant to change: Self-enhancing responses to diverging performance measures , 2007, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

[40]  D. Strang,et al.  Who Does an Elite Organization Emulate? , 2009 .

[41]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Inequity In Social Exchange , 1965 .

[42]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  A model of adaptive organizational search , 1981 .

[43]  Ladd Wheeler,et al.  Motivation as a determinant of upward comparison , 1966 .

[44]  Mathew L. A. Hayward,et al.  Believing one's own press: the causes and consequences of CEO celebrity , 2004 .

[45]  Tom Pyszczynski,et al.  The self-serving attributional bias: Beyond self-presentation , 1982 .

[46]  M. Brewer,et al.  Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. , 1996 .

[47]  Michael L. Lemmon,et al.  Does the use of peer groups contribute to higher pay and less efficient compensation , 2008 .

[48]  Ladd Wheeler,et al.  Social Comparison in Everyday Life , 1992 .

[49]  Jeremy C. Short,et al.  Organizational performance referents: An empirical examination of their content and influences , 2003 .

[50]  K. White,et al.  Culture and Social Comparison Seeking: The Role of Self-Motives , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[51]  James G. March,et al.  Learning from samples of one or fewer* , 1991 .

[52]  R. Collins.  For Better or Worse: The Impact of Upward Social Comparison on Self-Evaluations , 1996 .

[53]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  The Paradox of Success: An Archival and a Laboratory Study of Strategic Persistence Following Radical Environmental Change , 2000 .

[54]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[55]  Philip Bromiley,et al.  Comparing Aspiration Models: The Role of Selective Attention , 2010 .

[56]  S. Read,et al.  Self-verification processes: How we sustain our self-conceptions , 1981 .

[57]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? , 1975 .

[58]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[59]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[60]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Accounting for the effects of accountability. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[61]  S. Fiske,et al.  Comprar Social Beings: A Core Motives Approach to Social Psychology | Benjamin L. Miller | 9780470129111 | Wiley , 2009 .

[62]  M. Strube,et al.  The Multiply Motivated Self , 1995 .

[63]  S. E. Taylor,et al.  Social comparison activity under threat: downward evaluation and upward contacts. , 1989, Psychological review.

[64]  J. Kruger,et al.  Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[65]  Camille S. Johnson,et al.  When nothing compares to me : How defensive motivations and similarity shape social comparison effects , 2007 .

[66]  J. March,et al.  Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention , 1992 .

[67]  H. Thomas,et al.  Risk-attitudes and the risk return paradox : prospect theory explanations , 1985 .

[68]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Network Studies of Social Influence , 1993 .