Questions Under Discussion: Where Information Structure Meets Projective Content

We discuss problems familiar from the literature on presupposition and information structure, and illustrate how a synthesis using the Question Under Discussion (QUD) framework yields fresh insight. In this framework, discourse is analyzed in terms of the strategy of inquiry pursued by the interlocutors, and individual utterances are interpreted relative to the question being addressed. This way of thinking offers a new perspective on diverse phenomena, including the projection of presuppositions, association with focus, contrastive topic marking, and variability of projection behavior. We review the principal issues and prior lines of research in each of these areas, and show how the issues may be recast in QUD terms.

[1]  Laurence R. Horn,et al.  On the semantic properties of logical operators in english' reproduced by the indiana university lin , 1972 .

[2]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse , 1986, CL.

[3]  Dorit Abusch,et al.  Presupposition Triggering from Alternatives , 2010, J. Semant..

[4]  E. Allyn Smith,et al.  Review of The Logic of Conventional Implicatures by Chris Potts , 2007 .

[5]  Jonathan Ginzburg,et al.  The Interactive Stance , 2012 .

[6]  Daniel Büring,et al.  On D-Trees, Beans, And B-Accents , 2003 .

[7]  Noah Constant.  English rise-fall-rise: a study in the semantics and pragmatics of intonation , 2012 .

[8]  Elizabeth Coppock,et al.  Principles of the Exclusive Muddle , 2014, J. Semant..

[9]  Tania Rojas-Esponda,et al.  A discourse model for überhaupt , 2014 .

[10]  J. van Kuppevelt,et al.  Inferring from topics , 1996 .

[11]  David I. Beaver,et al.  Question-based Models of Information Structure , 2016 .

[12]  J. V. Kuppevelt.  Discourse structure, topicality and questioning , 1995, Journal of Linguistics.

[13]  Lauri Karttunen,et al.  Some observations on factivity , 1971 .

[14]  Stephen R. Anderson,et al.  How to Get even , 1972 .

[15]  Craige Roberts,et al.  Toward a Taxonomy of Projective Content , 2013 .

[16]  David I. Beaver,et al.  What projects and why , 2010 .

[17]  Henk Zeevat,et al.  Presupposition and Accommodation in Update Semantics , 1992, J. Semant..

[18]  Saul A. Kripke,et al.  Presupposition and Anaphora: Remarks on the Formulation of the Projection Problem , 2009, Linguistic Inquiry.

[19]  Joachim Jacobs,et al.  Fokus und Skalen , 1983 .

[20]  Roger Schwarzschild,et al.  GIVENNESS, AVOIDF AND OTHER CONSTRAINTS ON THE PLACEMENT OF ACCENT* , 1999 .

[21]  Anne Reboul,et al.  Weak and Strong Triggers , 2015 .

[22]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  On the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers , 1984 .

[23]  David I. Beaver,et al.  The Best Question: Explaining the Projection Behavior of Factives , 2017 .

[24]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  A Compositional Semantics for Multiple Focus Constructions , 1991 .

[25]  Philippe Schlenker,et al.  Presupposition Projection: the New Debate , 2008 .

[26]  Irene Heim,et al.  On the Projection Problem for Presuppositions , 2008 .

[27]  David Beaver,et al.  3: Have You Noticed that Your Belly Button Lint Color is Related to the Color of Your Clothing? , 2002 .

[28]  Irene Heim,et al.  The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases : a dissertation , 1982 .

[29]  Craige Roberts,et al.  Information Structure: Afterword , 2012 .

[30]  Irene Heim,et al.  Presupposition Projection and the Semantics of Attitude Verbs , 1992, J. Semant..

[31]  Mandy Simons,et al.  On the Conversational Basis of Some Presuppositions , 2013 .

[32]  Mats Rooth.  A theory of focus interpretation , 1992, Natural Language Semantics.

[33]  Rob A. van der Sandt,et al.  Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution , 1992, J. Semant..

[34]  A. Kratzer.  An investigation of the lumps of thought , 1989 .

[35]  Craige Roberts,et al.  Information Structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics , 2012 .

[36]  Todor Koev,et al.  Experimental Evidence for the Truth Conditional Contribution and Shifting Information Status of Appositives , 2015, J. Semant..

[37]  Scott DeLancey,et al.  The mirative and evidentiality , 2001 .

[38]  Márta Abrusán,et al.  Predicting the presuppositions of soft triggers , 2011 .